u/firs_7

Shift work so we eat lunch together. Nonsensical to leave for lunch as it’s 45 minutes. Was told not to eat garlic products before a shift and that they weren’t allowed in break room.

I don’t want to be a dick but literally everything has garlic in it. My normal meals all have some amount of garlic. I meal prep and now everything I had planned is a no go. I did not realize this would be an issue until orientation. Literally went to grocery store and finding garlic free foods is VERY limiting.

I won’t show up with like Italian food but GD this really is a pain in the ass.

New job. Coworker can’t have garlic so “garlic free office”. : r/WorkAdvice

The decision involves a procedure that needs consent from the patient

Jake was in a car crash, and is unconscious as a result. Money in this situation isn't taken into the picture

Jake's wife dies in the car crash, and she was the only one who had the authority to consent/not consent for medical decisions regarding him (that's called medical power of attorney, if I remember correctly).

Jake doesn't have any siblings in all situations. He does have children but they are kids.

My question is: Who would be the one making medical decisions in situations below?

1. If Jake was an orphan and/or had no relatives alive except his kids
2. Jake's patient note says not to give his patents' and relatives any info. What if he also has a restraining order against them?

So, TK said that SM needs true understanding to be defeated/stopped

I've noticed that a lot of people think this means that SM will get redeemed/will became PV's friend

However, what I think she actually meant is that he needs true understanding, yes, but not in the redeeming type of way.

I believe that TK meant that he needs true understanding to be predictable. To be manipulated to fall into a trap, use too much of the life energy, or simply trick him into building a prison for PV/Ancients/SS and then trapping SM there

After all, if SM is entirely predictable, and we know what his weak spots are (true understanding!), then it's much easier to defeat his

What do you think about my theory? Also, let me know if there are any plotholes in it!
(I'll be going to sleep right now tho, soooo I'll probably reply in 8-10 hours from now on (its 21.57 or 9pm 57 minutes for me here))

So, this post is inspired by a video I saw earlier today

In an orphanage, a 12 year old boy continuestly mocks a 14 year old girl for her behavior (mainly the way she moves. She isn't disabled, but walks weirdly).

One day, the girl is done, and strangles the boy to death.

In the video, she gets a life sentence, the possibility of parole wasn't mentioned. Jury present during the hearing agreed with that.

Also, in the video, the girl had no criminal defence attorney/lawyer

1. What sentence would she get in real life?

2. Would it be possible for her to get a reavulation of her sentence, because of her having no attorney/lawyer during the case hearing (which is illegal, I think), and thus her being in a position without any defence?