The age-old 8x vs 10x question for the billionth time.
I am a western hunter in Colorado, trying to balance the demands of bow hunting AND longer range rifle.
My next purchase will be a set of NL Pures. Considering their price, I am really trying to make sure I get it right. I've fondled them both at a local dealer, including standing out front at dusk, and I'll be darned if I can make up my mind.
This will be a chest bino, and only bino I carry. I sometimes carry a spotting scope, but not a second set of binos. I very rarely glass off a tripod with binos.
For all these reasons I was really leaning towards the 8x, but our local (well trusted) shop has been really steering me towards the 10x stating that with swaro's quality, light transmission, and edge to edge clarity expanding the effective FOV the 10s will serve all of my needs while helping out in the longer open spaces we deal with out west. He said that in east coast woods the 8s are amazing but the feedback he gets here in CO is mostly from people wishing they had the 10s.
Anyone who has used both specifically out west, do you have a pick? Would I regret just going with the 10s due to reduced FOV and slightly shakier one-hand glassing when holding a bow?