u/hello_i_am_vlad

Wolf has always been a bit of an odd character.

He has no problem working for Andross. In 64, he was essentially one of Andross's enforcers. In Assault, he's a crime boss who becomes an uneasy ally. In Command, he's an ally who, depending on the route, won't hesitate to betray you. And in Starlink, he's portrayed as a power-hungry megalomaniac.

Overall, Wolf seems like the kind of character who would commit just about any crime if there was something in it for him. That doesn't necessarily make him incapable of doing good, but self-interest always comes first.

The new remake's Holoviewer describes him as "ruthless, lacking any code of honor, cunning, and cool-headed," while also noting that he has "a magnanimous side, a talent for business, and above all, is a consummate professional."

By @heresyArtCat

I mean, he's a young canine guy; that's the sort of thing furries are supposed to like, but he barely has any fan art.

I don't really get this new dynamic between Falco and Fox.

Falco is constantly attacking and challenging Fox, but I can't tell if Fox is ignoring him or just playing along.

There are a lot of "para-fandoms" on the internet—communities of people who are huge fans of a game's story, characters, lore, and so on, but don't actually play the games. At most, they just watch Let's Plays.

A large part of the Undertale/Deltarune fandom falls into this category, and to some extent, so does FNAF's.

But FNAF has a nearly unique phenomenon: there's also a community of people who genuinely enjoy the gameplay (or at least the Clickteam-era games) but have little to no interest in the lore or characters, and find theory discussions exhausting.

Which is kind of hilarious. Normally, if you play a game, you'd at least expect to have a decent understanding of the characters and the plot. But FNAF is a unique case where you can play through the games and still have absolutely no idea who Michael is.