Why is the richest vegan ever (Arab named Steve Jobs) never donated his billions to Animal Rights? Stoopid Vegoon thought plants will cure his curable cancer. Least deluded dogmatic vegoon who thought all diseases will be cured by eating plants.

For more context behind this 1997 video, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KviMVCDAm7k

He called himself Vegan, but it seems he was into plant based died (typo but accurate), based on pseudoscience stuff & not for the ethics towards animals

Fun fact: the oldest known vegan is also a Syrian Arab, an Ex-Muslim Atheist philosopher who lived 1000 years ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Ma%27arri , just like the richest Vegan who is also Syrian Arab.

u/iamsreeman — 23 hours ago

AI bad, so I will decline 10x price for my farm land where I do Animal Agriculture which is far worse for the climate than a Data Center - EnvironMENTAList

>“They call us old stupid farmers, you know, but we’re not,” Huddleston said. “We know whenever our food is disappearing, our lands are disappearing, and we don’t have any water—and that poison. Well, we know we’ve had it.”

>The family owns about 1,200 acres of farmland outside Maysville, about two and a half hours east of Louisville. Last April, an unnamed company approached them about purchasing roughly half the property for a proposed data center.

https://www.wlky.com/article/kentucky-family-rejects-26-million-data-center/70844000

LoL, she has so many black cows as she walks in her 1,200 acres of farmland. Does she not realize that Animal Agriculture needs a lot more water than Data Centers?

Of course, Climate Change shouldn't even be a comparison between data centers and Animal Agriculture. Even if (hypothetically) Animal Agriculture does less climate change, Animal Abuse is always a bigger issue than Climate Change (which has indirect effects on animals, but direct Animal Abuse is always more important).

u/iamsreeman — 6 days ago

Chinistan & Two Nation Theory: What if the Dungan Revolt didn't kill 21 million Chinese Muslims?

See the screenshot in my original post.

I talked with many Chinese international students in the West & I am always surprised that they all only know about the Taiping Revolution (it killed more than WWI, even though it is neglected outside China in high school history), but they all don't know about the Dungan Revolt that also similarly killed more than WWI (I call it: Western War I).

I am going to guess what the Alternative History of China would have been if the Muslims had not been genocided & it would probably be a lot similar to my country, India. Even though initially the Hui (Note that Hui are ethnically the same as the Han & only religion was the differentiating factor; just like Pakistanis & Indians are similar racially, this is different from the Xinjiang Uyghurs, who are racially Central Asian & not East Asian. The Hui were also called "Hanhui" as they were Han people who converted) started the violence, the Han, in retaliation, basically genocided them, with their population today being only 11 million (a mere 0.8% of China). For comparison, the largest Hindu-Muslim war (due to Aurangazeb's fanaticism) was the Deccan Wars, which had lower casualties, killing 5 million, but the stronger power was the minority Muslims, so most of the dead were majority Hindus & it didn't change the percentage of either side much.

1. Two-Nation Theory: In British India in the 1930s, there was a theory called the Two-Nation Theory that said that the Muslims of the Indian subcontinent couldn't live with others (Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Christians, Parsis (Zorastrians who ran from Iran more than 1000 years ago & settled in India & today the main surviving Zorastrians) etc.) because they claimed their culture was completely different. This ideology later became violent & caused the forced displacement of 20 million people & the death of 2 million people. Although the violence was started by Muslims (due to Jinnah's Direct Action Day speech, where he incited Muslims to fight as Hindus opposed partition to create a secular country), the total dead had 1.2 million Muslims and 0.8 Million Hindus+Sikhs.

Now, in this timeline, inspired by the movement to create the "Islamic Republic of Pakistan", the NorthWest China region (just like the NorthWest part of Indian subcontient is now Pakistan) starts a movement for the "Islamic Republic of Chinistan". IRC helps the PRC & ROC to violently defeat the Japanese, just as Jinnah & the Muslim League helped Gandhi to nonviolently defeat the British. Once the war with Japan is over, they will declare independence.

2. PRC & ROC conflict is gone: Their entire conflict with ROC (Taiwan) is really the most pointless hate ever. They are culturally, linguistically, ethnically, etc., the same.

In this timeline, their relationship would be more like India & Nepal. Just like Indians & Nepalese have freedom of movement/work without any visas, Chinese & Taiwanese can easily go & work in the other without visas, etc. They would be strong allies.

3. China-Pakistan alliance is gone: Ever since the Sino-Soviet split, Pakistan has been China's most important ally, even more so than North Korea. China doesn't ideologically agree with Pakistan on anything, but China wants to be the only big power in Asia & doesn't want India to become as powerful/rich as China, so they give weapons & money to Pakistan just so Pakistan & its funding of terrorism will be a dead weight on India's development.

In this timeline, Pakistan & Chinistan would be allies as their founding was on the same ideology. So, China would likely ally with India to tackle the Chinistan-Pakistan alliance. China wouldn't do the 1962 surprise war on the very friendly India to do a cheap land grab of Kashmir.

4. Allies to Pakistan-Chinistan: The USA doesn't want China & India to be too powerful, that is why they support Taiwan & Pakistan, not because they genuinely care about the self-determination of the Taiwanese.

In this timeline, the USA would give weapons to Chinistan & Pakistan (just as they currently do to Pakistan) as a weight against China & India. Also, most Middle Eastern countries will likely help Chinistan & Pakistan against India & China.

5. Atheism wouldn't be big: Today, China contains more atheists than the rest of the world. This enormous rise in Atheism was due to Mao. Mao's mother was a devout Buddhist who once asked a Buddhist monk to raise Mao. Nehru, the architect of post-independence India, was also a very strong atheist who disliked religions as dogmatic nonsense. But due to the communal nature of Hindu-Muslim differences, Hindus became more Hindu & as a reaction to Islamism, the Hindutva movement was created. Due to such an increase in religiosity, Nehru, the 1st PM, couldn't convert the nation to Atheism.

In this timeline, the Chinese will also have a reactionary radicalization against Islamism & create a stronger religious identity around Buddhism, Confucianism, and Taoism. As a staunch atheist, I feel that's bad. The Two-Nation Theory of Chinistan would consider these 3 religions as similar cultures & can live in a single country, but Islam is very different than these 3.

6. TFR scare: Hindutva constantly mixes truth & conspiracies to scare people about the fertility rate. They talk about demographic war etc. Love jihad theory is a conspiracy, but some of what they say is true, like Muslims went from ~25% of the Indian subcontinent in 1947 to nearly ~35% now. They are scared that poor Hindus & rich Muslims have the same TFR.

In this timeline, if we assume China's demography similarly collapses & fertility drops below 1, they might be even more scared & make even more conspiracy theories that their enemies will become more populous than them in a few decades & that would increase their security risks.

7. Uyghurs: Even in this timeline, Uyghurs are still going to be persecuted, although a little less. Hui will dominate the population of Northwest China. Uyghurs are ethnically Turkic, while Hui are ethnically Han. This will be like how Kurds are now persecuted in Turkey for being an Iranic/Indo-Iranic ethnic group. Also similar to how Indo-Iranic language people like Balochis & Pashtuns are persecuted by the Indo-Aryan speaking Punjabis & Sindhis in Pakistan. Also, how the Bengali genocide happened before Bangladesh was created. The same religion doesn't mean language differences disappear.

8. Shared culture & language: Pakistanis grow up watching North Indian movies, as the Pakistan language is Urdu, which was made by sanskritizing the Hindustani language that was developed in Uttar Pradesh during the Mughals. Due to religious communalism, Urdu increased the % Persian words in Hindustani, while Hindi decreased it. But both are highly mutually intelligible.

In this timeline, Chinistan will speak a modified Mandarin with a high % of words from Persian & Arabic. Chinistanis will also grow up watching the enemy country's Chinese movies & TV shows, as the large population obviously produces more movies & shows than them.

u/iamsreeman — 12 days ago

Chinistan & Two Nation Theory: What if the Dungan Revolt didn't kill 21 million Chinese Muslims?

I talked with many Chinese international students in the West & I am always surprised that they all only know about the Taiping Revolution (it killed more than WWI, even though it is neglected outside China in high school history), but they all don't know about the Dungan Revolt that also similarly killed more than WWI (I call it: Western War I).

I am going to guess what the Alternative History of China would have been if the Muslims had not been genocided & it would probably be a lot similar to my country, India. Even though initially the Hui (Note that Hui are ethnically the same as the Han & only religion was the differentiating factor; just like Pakistanis & Indians are similar racially, this is different from the Xinjiang Uyghurs, who are racially Central Asian & not East Asian. The Hui were also called "Hanhui" as they were Han people who converted) started the violence, the Han, in retaliation, basically genocided them, with their population today being only 11 million (a mere 0.8% of China). For comparison, the largest Hindu-Muslim war (due to Aurangazeb's fanaticism) was the Deccan Wars, which had lower casualties, killing 5 million, but the stronger power was the minority Muslims, so most of the dead were majority Hindus & it didn't change the percentage of either side much.

1. Two-Nation Theory: In British India in the 1930s, there was a theory called the Two-Nation Theory that said that the Muslims of the Indian subcontinent couldn't live with others (Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Christians, Parsis (Zorastrians who ran from Iran more than 1000 years ago & settled in India & today the main surviving Zorastrians) etc.) because they claimed their culture was completely different. This ideology later became violent & caused the forced displacement of 20 million people & the death of 2 million people. Although the violence was started by Muslims (due to Jinnah's Direct Action Day speech, where he incited Muslims to fight as Hindus opposed partition to create a secular country), the total dead had 1.2 million Muslims and 0.8 Million Hindus+Sikhs.

Now, in this timeline, inspired by the movement to create the "Islamic Republic of Pakistan", the NorthWest China region (just like the NorthWest part of Indian subcontient is now Pakistan) starts a movement for the "Islamic Republic of Chinistan". IRC helps the PRC & ROC to violently defeat the Japanese, just as Jinnah & the Muslim League helped Gandhi to nonviolently defeat the British. Once the war with Japan is over, they will declare independence.

2. PRC & ROC conflict is gone: Their entire conflict with ROC (Taiwan) is really the most pointless hate ever. They are culturally, linguistically, ethnically, etc., the same.

In this timeline, their relationship would be more like India & Nepal. Just like Indians & Nepalese have freedom of movement/work without any visas, Chinese & Taiwanese can easily go & work in the other without visas, etc. They would be strong allies.

3. China-Pakistan alliance is gone: Ever since the Sino-Soviet split, Pakistan has been China's most important ally, even more so than North Korea. China doesn't ideologically agree with Pakistan on anything, but China wants to be the only big power in Asia & doesn't want India to become as powerful/rich as China, so they give weapons & money to Pakistan just so Pakistan & its funding of terrorism will be a dead weight on India's development.

In this timeline, Pakistan & Chinistan would be allies as their founding was on the same ideology. So, China would likely ally with India to tackle the Chinistan-Pakistan alliance. China wouldn't do the 1962 surprise war on the very friendly India to do a cheap land grab of Kashmir.

4. Allies to Pakistan-Chinistan: The USA doesn't want China & India to be too powerful, that is why they support Taiwan & Pakistan, not because they genuinely care about the self-determination of the Taiwanese.

In this timeline, the USA would give weapons to Chinistan & Pakistan (just as they currently do to Pakistan) as a weight against China & India. Also, most Middle Eastern countries will likely help Chinistan & Pakistan against India & China.

5. Atheism wouldn't be big: Today, China contains more atheists than the rest of the world. This enormous rise in Atheism was due to Mao. Mao's mother was a devout Buddhist who once asked a Buddhist monk to raise Mao. Nehru, the architect of post-independence India, was also a very strong atheist who disliked religions as dogmatic nonsense. But due to the communal nature of Hindu-Muslim differences, Hindus became more Hindu & as a reaction to Islamism, the Hindutva movement was created. Due to such an increase in religiosity, Nehru, the 1st PM, couldn't convert the nation to Atheism.

In this timeline, the Chinese will also have a reactionary radicalization against Islamism & create a stronger religious identity around Buddhism, Confucianism, and Taoism. As a staunch atheist, I feel that's bad. The Two-Nation Theory of Chinistan would consider these 3 religions as similar cultures & can live in a single country, but Islam is very different than these 3.

6. TFR scare: Hindutva constantly mixes truth & conspiracies to scare people about the fertility rate. They talk about demographic war etc. Love jihad theory is a conspiracy, but some of what they say is true, like Muslims went from ~25% of the Indian subcontinent in 1947 to nearly ~35% now. They are scared that poor Hindus & rich Muslims have the same TFR.

In this timeline, if we assume China's demography similarly collapses & fertility drops below 1, they might be even more scared & make even more conspiracy theories that their enemies will become more populous than them in a few decades & that would increase their security risks.

7. Uyghurs: Even in this timeline, Uyghurs are still going to be persecuted, although a little less. Hui will dominate the population of Northwest China. Uyghurs are ethnically Turkic, while Hui are ethnically Han. This will be like how Kurds are now persecuted in Turkey for being an Iranic/Indo-Iranic ethnic group. Also similar to how Indo-Iranic language people like Balochis & Pashtuns are persecuted by the Indo-Aryan speaking Punjabis & Sindhis in Pakistan. Also, how the Bengali genocide happened before Bangladesh was created. The same religion doesn't mean language differences disappear.

8. Shared culture & language: Pakistanis grow up watching North Indian movies, as the Pakistan language is Urdu, which was made by sanskritizing the Hindustani language that was developed in Uttar Pradesh during the Mughals. Due to religious communalism, Urdu increased the % Persian words in Hindustani, while Hindi decreased it. But both are highly mutually intelligible.

In this timeline, Chinistan will speak a modified Mandarin with a high % of words from Persian & Arabic. Chinistanis will also grow up watching the enemy country's Chinese movies & TV shows, as the large population obviously produces more movies & shows than them.

u/iamsreeman — 12 days ago

Look at the current version of the Gaza genocide page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gaza_genocide&oldid=1351159685

>The Gaza genocide is the ongoing,[22][23] intentional, and systematic destruction of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip carried out by Israel during the Gaza war. It encompasses mass killings, deliberate starvation, infliction of serious bodily and mental harm, and prevention of births. Other acts include blockading, destroying civilian infrastructure, destroying healthcare facilities, killing healthcare workers and aid-seekers, causing mass forced displacement, committing sexual violence, and destroying educational, religious, and cultural sites.[24] The genocide has been recognised by a United Nations special committee[25] and commission of inquiry,[24] the International Association of Genocide Scholars,[26][27] multiple human rights groups,[d] state governments, numerous genocide studies and international law scholars,[33][34] and other experts.[35]

Look at the current version of the Tamil Genocide page, despite 154,022 to 253,818 Tamil civilians getting killed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_genocide&oldid=1345292309

>The Tamil genocide refers to the framing of various systematic acts of physical violence and cultural destruction committed against the Tamil population in Sri Lanka during the Sinhala–Tamil ethnic conflict beginning in 1956, particularly during the Sri Lankan civil war as acts of genocide. Various commenters, including the Permanent Peoples' Tribunal, have accused the Sri Lankan government of responsibility for and complicity in a genocide of Tamils, and point to state-sponsored settler colonialism, state-backed pogroms, and mass killings, enforced disappearances and sexual violence by the security forces as examples of genocidal acts.^([7])^([8])^([9]) The Sri Lankan government has rejected the charges of genocide.^([10])

Look at the Tigray genocide article from 6 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tigray_genocide&oldid=1322273427

>The Tigrai genocide or Tigray genocide was the alleged genocidal acts committed during the Tigray war in Ethiopia, which began in November 2020 and formally ended in November 2022.^([6])^([7])^([8])^([9]) The conflict started when the regional government of Tigray sought greater autonomy, prompting a military intervention by the Ethiopian National Defense Force (ENDF) and its allies, including the Eritrean Defence Forces (EDF) and regional militias.

The Tamil one is considered as "one framing or one opinion" as genocide, but in other framings, it is not a genocide. It clearly reads as more of an opinion than an objective fact. Within one month of the Gaza war starting, some news channels & some human rights organisations have already started saying the Gaza war is a genocide, & Wiki has already started arguing if it should be called Genocide in the talk page. Back then, I thought Wikipedia was biased because back then it was also calling things like the Tigray genocide as Alleged despite it killing between 385,000 and 600,000 of the total 6 million Tigrayans https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-surge-of-dehumanizing-hate-speech-points-to-mounting-risk-of-mass/ "Independent scholars, based at Ghent University in Belgium, suggest that the death toll in Tigray is now between 385,000 and 600,000". The war killed upto 10%.

But 6 months ago, they removed the word alleged but still, the words they use do not look as serious as the words they use in the Gaza genocide article. But I think this is not a bias due to Wikipedia. They have strict rules that you need to cite reputable organisations. You genuinely can't find many Western human rights organisations calling the Tamil "genocide", Tigray "genocide" etc most human rights organisations call these things war crimes & wars. So, according to the Wiki logic of using whatever is the majority consensus, there is no bias here. The bias is from Human Rights organisations; they just happen to care much less about other wars & write on them less seriously. Only in Gaza war there is an unanimous consensus from Human Rights organisations.

Personally, I don't have too strong opinions on whether all 3 are genocides or all 3 are non-genocide war crimes. I think they should be more consistent. But I think it is wrong to selectively use words like genocide based on their own agenda.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sudanese_civil_war_(2023%E2%80%93present)&oldid=1351363496 current Sudan war article also doesn't call it a genocide by RSF & UAE despite some 400,000 direct deaths, 522,000 indirect starvation deaths.

Some might say the other genocides & large-scale wars that happen in Africa (like Ethiopia, Sudan) & the Middle East (Syria, Yemen), etc., should be judged by lower standards because they are not developed countries with educated people. Even then, I don't think they apply similar standards to developed countries like the USA. The American Right routinely accuses the left of being haters of America who look at the crimes of the USA with a magnifying glass, but I don't think they judge their country with high standards.

The US killed 1 million directly & 4.5 million indirectly in the War on Terror as a revenge for 3000 deaths in the 9/11 terrorist attack. The US did it with 0 existential risk compared to Israel (the US could have just increased airport security & it would be enough). Israel, on the other hand, has stuff like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gharqad Gharqad tree coming from the top 2 most authentic hadiths saying their ethnoreligious group must be erased so that Judgement Day is started & believers can go to heaven, which causes existential risk from all the neighboring countries (even if regimes like Jordan/Egypt are friendly due to American pressure, the people of those countries overwhelmingly hate). If Israel didn't show a strong response to October 7, it would basically mean asking for more such things from all the neighbours. So, I don't think they even put similar high standards on all the rich developed countries like the USA, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE either. They (left & human rights organisations) only call the USA did war crimes without the genocide label. No human rights organizations call the War on Terror as genocides against Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan, etc.

reddit.com
u/iamsreeman — 2 months ago