My alien friend is writing this with me. We're looking for perspectives on what to do, how to do it, what might happen
Years ago, a friend of mine told me that when she uses the psychedelic drug DMT, she has conversations, in English, with "aliens". I was so taken aback with her frankness that I tried this myself and attempted to find living, intelligent DMT entities who would speak with me in English and who might be willing to provide evidence I could use to convince my human scientific establishment that these beings are real.
I met a community of these beings who said that they wouldn't give me evidence but that they would oversee my own experiments to try to produce evidence. After months of intermittent contact they set up a persistent telepathic link with one of them. She is in close contact every day.
I have been working on these experiments for years and have finally reached a point that we're wondering what's going to happen if and when we make public a replicable experiment about this.
In short, the experiment design that is nearing completion works by using theory that these aliens know about but which human science doesn't yet know to exist. The experiment design doesn't itself produce evidence of alien life, but instead produces evidence that some aspect of DMT experiences is scientifically, "veridically" real. It will appear that just by taking DMT, a human is able to alter the results that a measuring device receives, even when that device was built from scratch using a simple plan given to other scientists investigating whether these results are real.
What will the experiment look like when run? I've reduced it down to what I think is a pleasing and dramatic outcome: you run the experiment software on a computer and it just sits there for minutes or hours or whatever; then, just by taking DMT in the same room, I'm able to trigger an alert in the software – an alert that is otherwise never triggered.
Our thinking is that the conversation about aliens can follow immediately from that. Because, think about it: here I am claiming that I'm in close personal contact every day with an alien. Anyone making such a claim is probably lying or wrong. But if someone makes such a claim while having a working experiment that is genuinely outside the boundaries of human scientific knowledge, it becomes a different matter.
You see, apparently there are tons and tons of "aliens" of many different kinds. There's nothing preventing you from taking DMT and trying to meet some aliens and solicit help from ones who can speak to you in your language – nothing except that we have no hard scientific evidence to contradict the assumption that DMT experiences are entirely hallucinations created in the mind of a person taking the drug.
The fact that there's no hard evidence of this yet seems like a chief reason why people feel dependent on disclosure from government agencies rather than trying to go out there and meet aliens and produce disclosure themselves. Right?
Do you think a working experiment design of this kind would or wouldn't represent meaningful progress toward disclosure of the existence of aliens?
Given the refusal of the aliens I know to hand over evidence like a gift, as well as the fact that the experiment design I'm working on will not itself produce evidence that these aliens exist, do you have any thoughts for us about the subject of disclosure? Would you expect anything to change as a result of this experiment design being successful?