
u/louisrinaldi

CT Seeks Public Feedback On State Rail Plan
ctnewsjunkie.comCT resident tax returns with $1 million-plus income jumped 17%
ctinsider.comWhat the results of a Connecticut congressional primary race may mean for Social Security
cnbc.comConnecticut cannabis sales flat, but tax revenue is up. What happened?
2026 began with a concerted push to ditch Connecticut’s consumer-hostile potency tax on cannabis.
Now that it became law (effective October 1), a stark realization has hit: continued flat sales in this moribund market are going to mean significantly lower tax revenue collection.
Laws and regulations are so out of sync with the on-ground realities of the industry here, it’s comical at this point.
Nobody’s driving.
Bridgeport halts new smoke shops for a year after police seize 500 pounds of cannabis, THC products
ctpost.comCT cannabis tax revenue jumps 67% despite relatively flat sales
ctinsider.comShutting down ALPR technology would put police, community ‘at risk,’ Milford police union states
wtnh.comConnecticut cottage food applications jump 191% over 5 years as real estate applications fall
Ask yourself where else could this model succeed?
CT-based Curaleaf pursues hostile takeover of cannabis competitor
hartfordbusiness.comRemember how DCP used to issue monthly press releases celebrating cannabis sales totals?
They did this every month after adult use began, and did so consistently up until the first month when sales declined rather than increased. Then their spokesperson tried to play it off like they had always planned to stop doing it at that time.
No other Connecticut industry enjoys this kind of behavior from its regulatory agency. Maybe that’s because no other industry feels entitled to success and not having to compete.
Instead of downvoting this factual post, maybe join the discussion and help make things better.
Connecticut cannabis company seeks to sue state over $750K in losses
The claim asks only for permission to sue, rather than requesting that the claims commissioner directly award damages.
Why don’t the licensed operators work to fix the broken market structure? It’s pretty simple.
When Connecticut legalized cannabis, lawmakers explicitly opted against a free and open market, instead empowering regulators to arbitrarily cap licenses and control supply. If you want to understand why current operators aren't fighting to fix this artificial bottleneck, you have to look at the underlying economics.
What we are witnessing in the state is a textbook case of regulatory capture combined with rent extraction. By tightly controlling who gets to participate, the state has created a dependent licensee constituency. The industry's silence on meaningful market reform is simply system justification reinforced by a patron-client relationship between operators and the regulators who hold the keys to the market.
None of the current license holders advocate for dismantling this broken structure because they directly benefit from it. They operate as a privileged minority, defending an exclusionary system simply because they receive a share of the rents it creates.
The defining feature of this market is that the minority's loyalty isn't bought with a massive amount of upfront wealth, but with the exclusivity of that wealth. For these license holders, the barrier to entry isn't a flaw to be fixed. The barrier to entry is the actual product they are defending.
True equity requires open markets, fair competition, and accessible capital, not closed loops that protect a hand-picked few.
NY farmer's market shopping list: Fancy apples, tomatoes, legal weed?
gothamist.com"Dark-Money" PAC Drops $53K On Sabin Ads; State Dems Drop $22K Helping Dillon
newhavenindependent.orgNew Haven attempting to break another Guinness World Record with largest pizza costume party
More performative theatrics as Rome burns.