Does the $100 AI Ultra plan offer good usage of Opus 5.5?
Does the $100 AI Ultra plan offer good usage of Opus 5.5?
Does the $100 AI Ultra plan offer good usage of Opus 5.5?
Hi, I’m a software developer, but I like telling stories. I was thinking of making scientific stories for kids. I tried making them as comics using AI, but I’m wondering if someone would accept this quality or if it’s too low.
Could you check it out and give me your feedback?
Hi,
I have been working on an in-apps customer support agent, that provides delegated assistance inside mobile apps: answering when data is enough, guiding when the user should act, and performing UI approved actions when the app allows it.
It asks before it acts, so AI won't just go click things on your behalf. Developers can set up "Are you sure?" checkpoints, especially for anything sensitive like payments, agreements, or deletions.
It never sees your private information. Sensitive details like passwords, card numbers, or personal data can be hidden from the AI entirely. It works around them without ever reading them. Developers can put things like "delete" buttons completely out of reach , the AI simply cannot touch them, no matter what.
I designed it to work primarily on flutter and react native apps, so that the app owner embeds it in his code. My question: Is there really a market need for this?
The scenario is:
"A customer asks why his latest order charged him $34."
Instead of immediately escalating to a human, the agent investigates inside the app, but first it asks for permission and states its plan. After that It navigates to the billing and charge details screens, reads the actual order data, and instead of returning plain text, it returns a rich UI breakdown: food subtotal, service fee, delivery fee, and tip.
Then the user says the delivery fee changed than the one he saw before placing an order.
The agent does not guess. It checks the charge again, asks the customer what previous value they saw, and then reports the issue with the relevant context.
When the user asks when he will get a reply, the ai honestly replies that it doesn't have specific timeline, but the issue is reported.
This is the behavior I think customer support agents should follow:
So this won't be another “chat with bot and maybe it tells you where to tap.”
but “An agent can understand the current app, navigate it, inspect the right data, and help the user complete the task.”
There is also a dashboard where you can see analytics, handle escalations, automation, etc..
An MVP example: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/d957Lb8QjUk
So what do you think?
Hi,
I have been working on a customer support agent, that can control app UI when the app owner embeds it inside his app, I designed it to work primarily on flutter and react native apps. My question: Is there really a market need for this?
The scenario is:
"A customer asks why his latest order charged him $34."
Instead of immediately escalating to a human, the agent investigates inside the app, but first it asks for permission and states its plan. After that It navigates to the billing and charge details screens, reads the actual order data, and instead of returning plain text, it returns a rich UI breakdown: food subtotal, service fee, delivery fee, and tip.
Then the user says the delivery fee changed than the one he saw before placing an order.
The agent does not guess. It checks the charge again, asks the customer what previous value they saw, and then reports the issue with the relevant context.
When the user asks when he will get a reply, the ai honestly replies that it doesn't have specific timeline, but the issue is reported.
This is the behavior I think customer support agents should follow:
So this won't be another “chat with bot and maybe it tells you where to tap.”
but “An agent can understand the current app, navigate it, inspect the right data, and help the user complete the task.”
There is also a dashboard where you can see analytics, handle escalations, automation, etc..
So what do you think?
Hi,
I have been working on a customer support agent, that can control app UI when the app owner embeds it inside his app, I designed it to work primarily on flutter and react native apps. My question: Is there really a market need for this?
The scenario is:
"A customer asks why his latest order charged him $34."
Instead of immediately escalating to a human, the agent investigates inside the app, but first it asks for permission and states its plan. After that It navigates to the billing and charge details screens, reads the actual order data, and instead of returning plain text, it returns a rich UI breakdown: food subtotal, service fee, delivery fee, and tip.
Then the user says the delivery fee changed than the one he saw before placing an order.
The agent does not guess. It checks the charge again, asks the customer what previous value they saw, and then reports the issue with the relevant context.
When the user asks when he will get a reply, the ai honestly replies that it doesn't have specific timeline, but the issue is reported.
This is the behavior I think customer support agents should follow:
So this won't be another “chat with bot and maybe it tells you where to tap.”
but “An agent can understand the current app, navigate it, inspect the right data, and help the user complete the task.”
There is also a dashboard where you can see analytics, handle escalations, automation, etc..
So what do you think?
Every support tool I've used does the same thing, you open a chat bubble and you talk to a dummy bot, and when things get serious it redirects you to a human.
I built an SDK that takes a different approach: the AI reads the React Fiber tree at runtime. Every Pressable, TextInput, Switch, Picker is discovered automatically. When it needs to act, it finds the element's onPress handler from the Fiber node and calls it directly. With no screenshots, OCR, nor selectors.
You can talk to it by text or just by voice.
And the usage is dead simple, just wrap your app with it, and that's all. You can set your backend as the ai source:
<AIAgent
proxyUrl="https://myapp.vercel.app/api/gemini"
proxyHeaders={{ Authorization: `Bearer ${userToken}` }}
provider="gemini"
voiceProxyUrl="https://voice-server.render.com" // only if text proxy is serverless
navRef={navRef}
>
{/* your app */}
</AIAgent>
or for local development you can use the key directly
<AIAgent
provider="openai"
apiKey="YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY"
// model="gpt-4.1-mini" ← default, or use any OpenAI model
navRef={navRef}
>
{/* your app */}
</AIAgent>
Default is Copilot mode — AI navigates and fills forms silently, pauses before anything irreversible (place order, delete, payment). You can also add aiConfirm to specific buttons as a code-level safety net.
You wrap your app with one component, and the AI can:
It also works as an MCP server: for example connect Claude Desktop to your emulator and test your app in plain English. No Detox setup needed.
You can call custom business logic you register with a useAction hook: like checkout, apply promo code, or cancel an order without needing a visible button for it and ai agent will trigger it when needed.
There's an optional dashboard too, which provides escalation inbox with live WebSocket chat, interaction analytics, heatmaps, automations, etc..
https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-native-agentic-aiTell me what do you think, Will you use such library in your apps, and how do you think it can be better?