u/mrnobody0013

Le Monde – L’enquête sur l’assassinat de Mehdi Kessaci dévoile un contrat à 100 000 euros et une possible erreur de cible : « On me demandait de surveiller Amine »

lemonde.fr
u/mrnobody0013 — 10 days ago

Le Monde – « C’est quoi le meilleur truc à faire avec mes 1 000 euros ? » : de plus en plus de jeunes préfèrent l’IA pour les questions d’argent

lemonde.fr
u/mrnobody0013 — 10 days ago

Le Monde – Symbio, la pépite française de l’hydrogène, a brûlé 350 millions d’euros d’aides publiques en deux ans avant de licencier 70 % des salariés

lemonde.fr
u/mrnobody0013 — 12 days ago

The hard upbringing of two French drug lords

Hey!

On this subreddit, we rarely hear about organized crime, and even less about French gangsters. In recent years, a drug trafficking gang called the “DZ Mafia,” born in Marseille (a city in southern France), has spread terror across France: murders, drug trafficking, threats against law enforcement, etc.

In 2025, the group even carried out attacks aimed at intimidating the French prison administration. Several prisons were targeted by arson attacks against prison guards’ vehicles, notably in Agen and Marseille, while Toulon-La Farlède prison was hit by Kalashnikov-style automatic gunfire at its entrance. Other actions included graffitis found on prison buildings, drones flying over prisons, and intimidation of prison staff near their homes.

Last March, two major DZ Mafia leaders were put on trial : Gabriel Ory (a white Frenchman) and Amine Oualane (a Frenchman of Algerian origin). During the trial, a lot of attention was given to the defendants’ personalities and life paths, and I found this analysis particularly fascinating. It’s really interesting to understand how “drug lords” are shaped and produced.

So I juste want to share with you two translations of French newspaper articles written during the trial :

Article 1 — “Lack of money destroyed my life”: the upbringing of Gabriel Ory and Amine Oualane, alleged bosses of the DZ Mafia (Le Parisien)

The defendant barely knew his father — if at all. He was only three days old when his mother fled hundreds of kilometers away with her baby in her arms. Jean-Louis, this father described as violent and alcoholic, briefly reappeared in the little boy’s life when he was three years old, just long enough to give him a necklace with a medallion depicting… a cannabis leaf.

The special education worker recounting this anecdote before the Aix-en-Provence criminal court then went on to describe the life of Gabriel Ory, 31, one of the alleged leaders of the DZ Mafia, who is being tried alongside five other men for a double murder carried out by an organized gang in 2019.

The overweight thirty-year-old with a receding hairline presents journalists with the unreadable appearance of an ordinary man, with no real distinguishing features except perhaps the restless movement in his eyes, giving the impression that he thinks more than he moves. His longtime friend, Amine Oualane, sitting two seats away in the defendants’ box, is the complete opposite: thin where the other is heavy, dark, tense, olive-skinned. He is another alleged leader of the Marseille clan with mafia ambitions, born in the early 2020s from the ruins of a ruthless victorious war against the Yoda clan.

Examining their personalities during the first days of the trial raises the question of how much delinquency is a predetermined path. “Do you know Bourdieu?” a lawyer asked a psychologist in court, in what sounded like an obvious point being dramatically emphasized. The sociologist of social reproduction could easily have used Oualane’s case as an example. Known as “Mamine,” he grew up in the shadow of the housing projects of Marseille’s northern districts, in an environment marked by every kind of hardship — financial, social, and emotional.

Yet while these weaknesses may help explain entry into delinquency, they do not fully explain the extraordinary criminal scale and extreme violence that became the trademark of the supposed leaders of Marseille’s gang with hegemonic ambitions. Proof that there are exceptions to every rule, Adrien Faure — also on trial and accused of acting as an enforcer in the 2019 double murder — grew up in a modest but stable family environment, perhaps even excessively structured in the eyes of the eldest son.

His Senegalese immigrant parents carefully saved part of their welfare benefits every month into savings accounts for their children in order to secure their future. But Faure, attracted by designer clothes and luxury cars, found drug dealing to be a faster route to wealth. Even moving the family to a neighborhood less affected by trafficking changed nothing.

Zaineddine Ahamada, another alleged hitman involved in the killings, reportedly told investigators that he was “in drugs” the same way others are “in finance.” According to investigators, he “went from lookout to dealer, then manager” of a drug dealing spot. “He talks about this business like it’s a company. He recites his résumé,” one investigator noted.

Suspected of standing at the very top of the DZ Mafia hierarchy and killing in order to rule, Amine Oualane stole food as a child, left largely on his own with a suicidal mother addicted to medication. At 11, he was placed with his father, whose “educational methods were inappropriate, even violent.” His two older brothers were sent elsewhere. At school, “Mamine” was described as “aggressive.” By 15, he spent most of his time in the streets. At 17, delinquency somehow enabled him to rent his own apartment. At 18, it sent him to prison — a place he would barely leave afterward, except during a months-long escape during which authorities suspect him of participating in four assassination plots. A personality investigator noted one of his statements: “Lack of money killed my life.”

Gabriel Ory shared with his friend the absence of an authority figure during early childhood, poverty, and life in a troubled housing project — La Visitation, in his case. In the ghetto, his very French-sounding name was not an advantage. Diagnosed as hyperactive as a child, he struggled to “find his place” and rejected school, which in turn rejected him. His relationship with his severely disabled mother, who “tried by every means” to keep him away from bad influences — even sending him to live with an uncle in southwestern France — appears deeply conflictual in the background. He “spent some time in foster homes.” He ran away. Nobody looked for him. At 16, he “became involved in dealing” and “sank deeper into the underworld.” His first armed robbery, which earned him a five-year prison sentence before a juvenile court, was reportedly motivated by the need to repay a debt.

By the time personality investigators interviewed him, Ory had already risen through the ranks of organized crime. He was considered one of the three alleged leaders of the DZ Mafia. He had stopped accepting prison visits from relatives “so as not to burden them,” he later explained.

To the psychiatrist who interviewed him, “Gaby” — his nickname — revealed very little. Childhood and family seemed to be subjects he preferred to keep secret. He only shared banal details: that he liked soccer and considered himself “reserved” and “organized.” Psychiatric evaluations, both for him and for Amine Oualane, revealed no medical disorders.

In his corner of the defendants’ box, Gabriel Ory stopped looking around the courtroom on Tuesday afternoon. Holding a blue pen, he wrote on the railing in front of him as if it were a desk. “I’m preparing my defense, since I wasn’t able to do it before,” he told the court — a jab referring to the detention conditions he described as “inhumane,” linked to his status as a high-risk organized crime inmate.

But he would not be allowed to speak until the following day, Wednesday evening, unexpectedly and for the first time since the trial began.

Article 2 — Hard childhood, crime, and lack of empathy : inside the psychology of the DZ Mafia leaders (Le Point)

The Aix-en-Provence criminal court examined the personalities of the five defendants being tried in connection with the double murder that took place in Marseille’s northern suburbs in 2019. Their backgrounds reveal vulnerabilities that may help explain their entry into delinquency — though not necessarily the level ultimately reached by the two alleged DZ Mafia bosses.

On the second day of hearings, Tuesday, experts explained to the court how Amine Oualane and Gabriel Ory drifted into delinquency during adolescence.

Their entry into adulthood happened in prison. Gabriel Ory was 17 when he was sentenced to six years in prison for armed robbery. Amine Oualane was also first imprisoned for robbery, at age 18. Since then, the man considered one of the leaders of the DZ Mafia has spent almost his entire life behind bars — 13 years in total. Alongside Gabriel Ory, himself suspected of being a high-ranking member of the DZ, the two friends entered violent criminality at a very early age. Yet their paths into delinquency developed in different contexts.

The man known as “Mamine” in criminal circles grew up in what investigators described as a “fairly unstable” household. His mother separated from her husband because of domestic violence. She herself was psychologically fragile, had attempted suicide several times, and was reportedly “unable to provide a secure environment for her children,” according to the personality investigator’s report presented before the court on March 24. Since Monday, the court has been hearing a three-week trial concerning a double murder committed in a hotel in the Plan-de-Campagne commercial zone in August 2019.

“Mamine’s” mother subjected him to physical abuse and severe neglect. The situation became serious enough for a juvenile judge to intervene and educational assistance measures to be imposed, revealing “parental failure,” situations of confinement, lack of food, and repeated violence. Bruises were found on the child. Violence inflicted with objects or cables led to official reports. This same violence later resurfaced at school, directed at classmates, but also at his mother and brothers. “He is distrustful, not very expressive, and has developed a kind of shell,” the investigator explained. “Violence seems normalized in the way he functions. He appears to have experienced it and reproduced it.”

In conflict with authority, he changed significantly during middle school. He dropped out in the equivalent of 8th grade with no qualifications. According to the investigator, this period marked the beginning of his downward spiral: “He spent his days in the streets with people already involved in delinquency.” At 17, he somehow managed to get his own apartment, though he never explained how he paid for it. “From adolescence onward, he seemed attracted to fast and easy money,” she continued. “He sought financial independence and rejected traditional paths of social integration. He wanted to escape the family home.” He himself reportedly said: “Lack of money killed my life. I wanted what I didn’t have as a child. […] It makes no sense — you don’t become rich by going to school.”

His lawyer, Inès Medioune, argued that this “desire for independence” was actually “a survival strategy”: “The extreme poverty was such that his mother couldn’t even feed her children, which pushed him to steal. We’re talking about a lack of basic necessities, not a desire for a Gucci bag!” That is how his first thefts, robberies, and prison sentence began. He later escaped during temporary release and entered a wandering, highly precarious period of his life, about which he said: “I went through hell, I had forgotten what life was like. […] It took me a month to adapt.” What did he mean by “went through hell” — suffering or enjoying himself? “A bit of both,” his lawyer replied. He seemed eager to answer himself from the defendants’ box, but the judge did not give him the opportunity.

The same tension emerged when the psychologist described him as lacking empathy, intolerant of frustration, possessing little introspective ability, and displaying antisocial personality traits. His lawyer argued that this could simply reflect a need to appear strong and to hide emotions because of a dangerous family environment. “I felt no human warmth, no kindness, no desire to connect with others,” the psychologist replied. “I found him cold. This is not a defense mechanism but an absence of emotion. His mother’s death did not appear to affect him.”

Shocked, his lawyer responded that losing his mother was the greatest trauma of his life. “I can usually observe suffering or anger,” the psychologist explained. “Here, there was very little emotion — a profound emotional deficiency. The person in front of me appeared dangerous because of these emotional and affective deficiencies and his lack of empathy.” At that point, the defendant, who had been signaling for several minutes that he wanted to speak, lost his temper. He stood up and shouted: “We’re going to stop this trial — you’ll do it without us.” A courtroom incident followed. After several interruptions the previous day, the presiding judge expelled him from the courtroom for the rest of the afternoon. He was expected to testify the following morning.

Gabriel Ory, nicknamed “Gaby,” also did not get the opportunity to speak about his personality. His mother left his father three days after his birth, believing he was incapable of raising him. Proof? At age three, the child returned from a visit wearing a necklace with a cannabis leaf medallion. His mother “fled,” trying to disappear for fear he would find them again. She eventually settled in La Visitation, a housing project in Marseille’s northern districts. “With a very French-sounding name, in that neighborhood, amid delinquency and immigration, his arrival was complicated,” the personality investigator explained. “He had to find his niche. […] He had to assert himself without a father figure. He always struggled with authority and constantly challenged it. […] Distrust toward authority is also part of the culture of his environment.”

School was difficult for him as well. Diagnosed with hyperactivity, he received treatment for it. His mother claimed he had been bullied by his elementary school principal. In middle school, he was expelled and forced to change schools. Even then, his mother noticed that some of his acquaintances were trying to pull him into delinquency. Disabled at 80%, she insisted she had done everything she could to keep him afloat. “She was overwhelmed,” the psychiatrist noted. She sent him to live with his uncle in an attempt to pull him out of the spiral and contacted social services. At one point, he reportedly experienced a breakdown, spoke about suicidal thoughts, and grabbed a knife. He was hospitalized in the psychiatric ward of La Timone hospital.

In high school, he disengaged completely, started skipping classes, and eventually dropped out. “He had desires and needs, and his family was poor. He started dealing drugs to make money,” the investigator explained. “It allowed him to have activities and a lifestyle somewhat similar to others. He said he liked money.”

He sank deeper into delinquency and later claimed that he needed to repay a debt. To do so, he committed robberies, armed thefts, and violent assaults. He nevertheless insisted to investigators that he never intended to use weapons and only carried them to intimidate people, whether the guns were unloaded or fake. During one robbery, he himself was shot.

According to the psychiatrist, he showed no real questioning of his own behavior and tended to blame others. She observed “psychopathic traits in his personality, though not enough clinical evidence to formally characterize a psychopathic personality.” He appeared angry toward the person he believed had “orchestrated” his implication in the current case: “I can’t accept it. I won’t do anything because I’m not a savage, but I cannot accept it.” He told the expert he was innocent and had been falsely accused.

When the psychiatrist met him in 2020, he refused visits from relatives “because he believed he had already caused too much damage in their lives […] and did not want to impose an additional mental burden on them.” Between ages 17 and 23, he had known almost nothing except prison. “He wasn’t influenced into this path — he takes responsibility for it,” the investigator concluded. “He never grabbed the lifelines that were available to him.”

reddit.com
u/mrnobody0013 — 13 days ago

DOCUMENT BFMTV/RMC. "Il était jaloux": le suspect qui a avoué le meurtre de la collégienne de 14 ans l’avait menacée par téléphone quelques jours plus tôt

bfmtv.com
u/mrnobody0013 — 14 days ago

Josef Schovanec is a French philosopher, writer, and autism advocate. He was diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome and is known for his work raising awareness about autism and challenging misconceptions about it. He has written several books, gives lectures internationally, and has been involved in public discussions on disability policy and neurodiversity in France.

This is an interview given in 2020 to a well-known French disability-focused media outlet :

Handicap.fr: In your opinion, what is autism?
Josef Schovanec: Autism is not a matter of opinion. It is defined in a serious and medical way. We must put an end to the belief that anyone, after declaring themselves autistic, can define autism according to their own wishes or beliefs. In particular, to mention just the most common misconceptions today: no, autism is not linked to astral body energies, nor to the oppression of women under patriarchy… Likewise, reaching one’s forties without having had the emotional or professional life one dreamed of does not make one autistic. Being a victim of crimes, rape, or other horrors does not make one autistic either. The list could go on…

H.fr: Do you think we are currently facing an increase in requests for ASD (autism spectrum disorder) diagnoses, some of which may be “incorrect”?
JS: Nearly all autism professionals observe that the proportion of incorrect diagnoses has spiraled out of control, but few dare to speak out, given how strong the taboo is. There is, fortunately, no national registry of autistic individuals; therefore, no one can know exactly how many people have received a diagnosis, especially since the expression “having a diagnosis” covers extremely varied realities.

Schematically speaking, and focusing only on adults whose request is personal (i.e., not initiated by a third party), one can reasonably estimate that two-thirds of new diagnoses are false or questionable. This is a fairly new phenomenon; ten or even five years ago, this rate was negligible. As for children, on the contrary, I believe most diagnoses are rather reliable.

H.fr: How can one identify an incorrect diagnosis?
JS: A number of elements clearly indicate misuse. For example, to mention just five: when the doctor in question never refuses a diagnosis, whereas others refuse nine out of ten; when the gender ratio among diagnosed individuals is clearly unbalanced (I will return to this); when the autism category absorbs other diagnoses such as schizophrenia or depression; when individuals accumulate multiple diagnoses (Ehlers-Danlos, twice-exceptional high IQ and multiple “dys” disorders, non-binary, ADHD, etc.); and finally, when the person displays what I would call the “magic square of social inclusion”—job, housing, family, car—with a particular mention for individuals who have had a large number of sexual partners. These are all signs that should call for the greatest caution.

Interestingly, the DSM-5 (the official manual for diagnosing mental disorders) has introduced “relief” categories to curb excessive use of autism diagnosis, but these categories are virtually never used: borderline personality disorder and social communication disorder, in particular. Other medical conditions are often confused with autism, such as fetal alcohol syndrome, which nevertheless presents clearly observable traits in people’s facial features, height, etc. As a result, everyone is considered autistic. Diagnostic overuse often coexists with underdiagnosis of genuinely autistic individuals.

H.fr: Can we speak of a “phenomenon” that leads to labeling various psychological disorders—or people who do not understand certain social codes—as autism?
JS: Or rather people who understand them very well. It is common for so-called autistic adults, who have no medically observable disability, to obtain extremely high disability rates and various administrative recognitions, while children who are clearly disabled—non-verbal autistic children, for example—fail to obtain an 80% disability rating from the MDPH (Departmental House for Disabled Persons). To quickly obtain an autism diagnosis, one must possess strong social skills, which is quite paradoxical. This is what I call the displacement effect of genuinely autistic individuals.

Another essential aspect of autism that has been almost entirely abandoned is the notion of autistic special interests. Nowadays, the vast majority of newly diagnosed individuals no longer have any such interests. It should be clarified that being interested in oneself, spending time on Facebook, liking nature, or sex are not autistic special interests. One telling anecdote: in the past, my friend Tony Attwood (a world-renowned autism specialist) would begin by asking an autistic person about their special interests to establish a connection; nowadays, many practitioners ask patients to describe their sex life to initiate contact and form a first impression.

H.fr: Does this concern women more than men?
JS: This is a highly sensitive issue. To remain factual, contrary to a widespread belief, autism has always been a predominantly female environment. Since Temple Grandin, an overwhelming majority of autobiographical accounts have been written by women; an overwhelming majority of specialized professionals are women (just visit a psychology or speech therapy faculty); an overwhelming majority of involved parents are mothers; and the same observation applies, more or less, to leadership spheres. The situation is such that, nowadays, one of the concerns when forming a committee or association is to find men. It is therefore difficult to argue that autism is a stronghold of patriarchy.

That said, I observe a strong increase in problematic diagnoses among men as well, through imitation or simply the desire to be in a predominantly female environment—sometimes with more or less questionable intentions.

H.fr: Are some doctors under pressure to provide these diagnoses, giving in “to keep the peace”? Is the medical community beginning to react?
JS: The medical community whispers these things but hardly dares to say them openly. You cannot imagine the storm that falls upon you if you refuse diagnoses or remain critical: accusations of ableism, sexism, physical attacks, complaints to professional bodies or courts… One could write a compendium of situations experienced by doctors: suicide threats during consultations if a diagnosis is refused, extreme medical tourism until all desired diagnoses are obtained, patients arriving with a complete file lacking only the signature, blackmail on social media, etc. It is humanly difficult to refuse a diagnosis to a patient who breaks down in tears and expresses extreme suffering. This is especially true for private practitioners, particularly male doctors. Healthcare professionals adapt in various ways: some give in, others change careers, others deliberately write nonsense on the report as a way of signaling a “false diagnosis,” and others turn it into a business quite openly.

H.fr: So this could be a profitable market?
JS: If you hand out diagnoses like hotcakes, you will gain an extraordinary reputation on social media and significant income. One name frequently mentioned is almost a caricature of the phenomenon; many anecdotes could be told if I had enough money for a lawyer. For beneficiaries, the advantages are also numerous—for instance, in obtaining certain jobs, at universities or at CNRS. A lesser-known point is the advantage for companies: with generous distribution of autism diagnoses, the 6% employment quota for disabled persons can be easily exceeded, or almost.

H.fr: Is this situation also found in other countries, such as the United States?
JS: There are several terms used to describe people with questionable diagnoses: Aspinets, Wannabe, Barbie, “bling-bling autists,” etc. This trend indeed comes largely from the English-speaking world. France shifted around 2016 or 2017. The situation is now such that, when the film The Specials (Hors Normes) was released, audiences were surprised to see “real” autistic individuals.

H.fr: What impact does this have on people who are genuinely autistic and “in a situation of disability”? Waiting times for care, confusion, dilution of financial resources…?
JS: Exactly. One could add a growing discredit of the very notion of autism. People are not fooled—when non-autistic individuals with no signs of disability are given media exposure, they notice, even if they generally remain silent publicly.

Another perverse effect is the destruction of the autistic community. A few years ago, the autistic world was harmonious, and connections were built around shared interests. Nowadays, the only two possible topics of discussion are, caricaturing only slightly, sex and autism itself. Yet truly autistic individuals are only exceptionally interested in autism. As a result, genuine autistic people withdraw from the very spaces meant for them. Likewise, few truly autistic individuals undertake and complete the arduous process of obtaining a diagnosis; this is another example of what I call the displacement effect.

H.fr: Could France’s current policy of early diagnosis help limit such “misuses,” particularly late diagnoses in adulthood?
JS: One possible approach would indeed be to focus on childhood diagnosis. Another would be to hold journalists accountable (myself included, in a way), for example by pointing out that it is problematic that the five podcasts on autism produced by Télérama at the end of 2019 were all female and focused mainly on emotional life.

Ultimately, however, pressure will grow to find a new classification; this is, after all, the history of medicine. Let us simply ensure that the most excluded individuals—autistic people confined to places cut off from the world—are not further marginalized in this so-called inclusive society whose virtues are so often praised.

H.fr: You don’t mince your words…
JS: The first reaction to my accepting this interview was: “That’s brave of you.” A Canadian friend strongly advised me not to speak about these issues. I know this will bring me serious trouble… But I will speak the truth, whatever the cost.

Schovanec : "Autisme adulte, trop de diagnostics abusifs"

u/mrnobody0013 — 27 days ago