▲ 82 r/RKLB
Rocket Lab CEO Peter Beck on the company’s record growth, Neutron, its Iridium deal, defense ambitions and the race to build a space powerhouse.
linkedin.comu/pakis54 — 10 hours ago
▲ 24 r/RKLB
Rocket Lab CEO Peter Beck on expanding into satellite communications
youtube.comu/pakis54 — 10 hours ago
▲ 214 r/RKLB
Connecting the dots(and they are many of them)
Preface: Everything in here u can read better presented in trypto_tran's 1st post as of now, the guy who made the original research and posts, on twitter, he did an amazing work, everything has sources and videos for u to watch and things to search, and its better presented than what reddit will alow me, but for those who dont want to go on elon's platform here u go:
(Tldr in comments below)
On May 26th 2026 Rocket Labs made an announcement:
"We have officially acquired Motiv Space Systems. Motiv – now Rocket Lab Robotics – brings mission-tested Mars heritage with advanced multi-degree of freedom robotic arms, actuators, and drive electronics that have enabled some of the most ambitious planetary exploration missions in history, including NASA's Mars Perseverance rover.
We're now one of few companies in the world capable of delivering end-to-end Mars mission solutions including launch, spacecraft, software, and proven robotics for surface and on-orbit operations. This unique capability positions us to lead programs like Mars Sample Return mission and the Mars Telecommunications Network."
Now....
While Mars and ISAM have been rightfully cited as applications of Motiv's robotic arms, what's gotten less attention is that, like most space technologies, these arms are inherently dual-use
RKLB has stated that, in addition to MSR/MTN, the Motiv acquisition positions them to "expand into significant national security applications requiring autonomous robotics in contested or remote environments."
What might such applications entail?
First, some context. Over the past decade, China has launched several maneuverable Shijian sats to GEO.
SJ-17 carried a robotic arm, while SJ-21 captured and relocated a satellite, capabilities the military fears could be used for grappling or attacking U.S. spacecraft.
+
And China isn't alone. Russia has tested "nesting doll" co-orbital ASATs that maneuver near other spacecraft, while their Luch/Olymp SIGINT sats have stalked key European commsats for years.
+
More recently, several Cosmos military satellites maneuvered into the same orbital plane as ICEYE radarsats supporting Ukraine.
Source:
https://integrityisr.com/is-russia-maneuvering-to-threaten-an-iceye-satellite/
Russia seems to be threatening a *commercial* satellite that provides imaging services to Ukraine:
-starting about two weeks ago, Russia started maneuvering five (!) of their classified satellites to the same orbital inclination as the ICEYE satellite
-these burns were big, on the order of 100 m/s, clearly using chemical propulsion given the speed of the burns — very expensive and deliberate maneuvers
-as of last Friday, all five Russian satellites are now co-planar, at ~97.8° inclination, with three of ICEYE's satellites, and aligned in other orbital elements (e.g. RAAN) that make it clear they're specifically targeting this set
-am a little skeptical that Russia is specifically targeting -X36 — there are two other satellites at the same inclination/RAAN (-X37 and -X38) — but the Russian sats are now all within striking distance of -X36, which is why people are concerned about it specifically; the closest cross-track distance is an estimated 500 meters (!!), all while the satellites are orbit 550 kilometers above Earth
-Russia has unleashed a cyberattack on a commercial satellite before (Viasat), and it is official Russian policy that commercially-owned infrastructure that aids in military efforts "may be legitimate target[s] for a retaliatory strike.”
-there's speculation that this could be a precursor to an RPO mission (meaning: physically grabbing the satellite or some other kind of non-kinetic attack like blinding/jamming)
Worth tracking closely. And unfortunately more evidence that space is militarizing, fast.
That doesn't mean an attack was imminent, but it's another example of increasingly adversarial behavior on orbit.
Layer in Chinese and Russian DA-ASAT capabilities, GPS/SATCOM jamming and spoofing, cyberattacks on space infrastructure, directed-energy systems meant to interfere with satellite sensors, and it's pretty clear that space is already contested across multiple fronts.
This is why Space Force is rapidly scaling space control and domain awareness to maintain superiority.
The FY27 USSF budget request puts $21.6B toward space control, up *158%* YoY and representing nearly 1/3 of the service's entire $71.1B budget.
That emphasis was echoed by Gen. Saltzman in his final public appearance as CSO, where space domain awareness, launch capacity, and "space-control capabilities to defend satellites" were highlighted as among the service's highest-priority mission areas.
Recent commentary from Impulse's Eric Romo corroborates the dynamics described above, while specifically flagging increased need for GEO space domain awareness and co-orbital "patrol" or "bodyguard" satellites.
This isn't just a U.S. trend - Japan, France, India, and Germany are also reportedly developing small guardian/bodyguard satellites as part of their counterspace arsenals.
https://www.airandspaceforces.com/new-space-threat-report-bodyguard-satellites/
Against this backdrop, RL has started to advertise "space protection and space control" as a key space systems offering, with RPO and robotic arms standing out as the most relevant capabilities when it comes to kinetic or physical counterspace applications.
Because while the publicly-stated use cases of robotic arms in space are debris removal, refueling, and servicing, those same arms are also latently capable of use in offensive or defensive operations. See below reporting on the recent DARPA RSGS mission:
Could This New Northrop Spacecraft Use Its Robotic Arms To Attack Enemy Satellites? The Mission Robotic Vehicle's job is maintaining and refueling satellites in orbit, but it also opens the door to a different kind of 'armed' capability.
https://www.twz.com/space/could-this-new-northrop-spacecraft-use-its-robotic-arms-to-attack-enemy-satellites
See also this informative resource from AerospaceCorp (SPARTA) which analyzes a number of orbital warfare tactics, techniques, and countermeasures: https://sparta.aerospace.org
One such technique is "proximity grappling", classified as a sub-technique of RPO. Essentially, satellites equipped with robotic arms can grapple and gain physical access to enemy spacecraft, enabling relocation or deorbiting, as well as a variety of other exploits and attacks.
To be clear, there's no explicit evidence that Motiv's arms are being contemplated for such use cases, but it's a reasonable inference to make, considering they're already working with DIU on modular arms equipped with optical/IR/lidar sensors.
https://www.therobotreport.com/motiv-space-systems-blue-origin-collaborate-on-modulink/
With a tech stack that appears increasingly aligned with the space control mission, one could envision RL developing a platform capable of inspection, capture, restraint, and relocation, using Geost's sensors and Motiv's arms as its figurative eyes and hands.
While companies like MDA + NOC, Infinite Orbits, Katalyst, Astroscale, and Starfish are developing vehicles with similar dual-use potential, RL's advantage (as usual) would be vertical integration of the complete chain from launch to spacecraft, sensors, robotics and operations.
As Victus Haze continues to come into focus, and Operation Olympic Defender nations (USA,UK,Australia,Canada,France,Germany,New Zeland) continue to develop orbital warfare plans & joint RPO exercises, now feels like the right time for RL to be working on a space control platform.
Zooming out - just as naval power grew with maritime commerce, space power is now growing around satellites.
Today’s space buildout echoes that of earlier domains, with commercial and govt infrastructure scaling alongside military forces that protect access and deny hostile use.
a16z news wrote a great piece recently underlining the principles of orbital warfare, which in my view is an increasingly compelling lens with which to evaluate much of what's going on at RL and the space industry as a whole:
u/pakis54 — 10 days ago
▲ 563 r/RKLB
Peter Beck communication letter to Rocket Lab's employees following the proposed acquisition of Iridium.
Hi everyone,
It’s a transformative day for Rocket Lab. Today we announced an agreement to acquire Iridium Communications Inc - yes, the Iridium – leading provider of global voice, data, and positioning, navigation, and timing satellite services.
With the completion of this deal, Rocket Lab will become a fully integrated, self-launching tier-1 space power, delivering critical communications capability to millions of users worldwide. We will become the only company in the world that can build their own satellites, launch their own rockets, and operate their own constellation across the only truly global network that provides coverage over every ocean, mountain, and airway.
So why Iridium?
You’ve long heard me talk about space applications being where the true value is in space. But to deliver space applications there are some big barriers.
1. Spectrum: It’s a finite resource. Because access to spectrum is limited and difficult to obtain, it plays an important role in enabling efficient operation of modern communications constellations. Iridium has spectrum in the form of L-band, the global gold standard for critical infrastructure, defense operations, and aviation/maritime safety networks.
2. Long wait to deploy infrastructure to generate your first revenue. It can take a decade or more to get your first cent from a new constellation. Iridium’s constellation of 66 satellites is operating right now.
3. Long time to build business model and customer base for sustained cash flow. It can take many more years to go from first revenue to real, sustainable revenue. Iridium is critical to 2.55 million subscribers and generated $871M in 2025 revenue.
As you can see, with Iridium as part of the Rocket Lab team we can leap over these barriers. By now you know that we don’t just acquire companies and sit on their existing capabilities. We apply the Rocket Lab magic to optimize and scale. We will leverage Iridium’s deep heritage and strategic backbone to scale into untapped markets and pioneer new space-based services to the benefit of global customers.
I encourage you all to read the full announcement here and watch the presentation here for the complete details. There is a regulatory process to complete before we can officially welcome Iridium to the Rocket Lab family, so stay tuned for the full completion of that, likely in mid-2027.
Please join me in celebrating this historic moment. What comes next is going to be a hell of a ride and we’re truly just getting started. Our future has just been unlocked and accelerated.
Thanks,
Pete
u/pakis54 — 2 months ago
▲ 221 r/RKLB
Formal invitation to a multi-billion-dollar space tracking market? (hopefully)
What the flying fuck are these pics and where are my monies u might ask?
Rocket Lab received a small $10,000 contract (pic 1) which is almost certainly their official entry ticket into a massive, multi-billion-dollar U.S. Space Force program called SB-AMTI (Space-Based Airborne Moving Target Indicator).
this tiny contract is a formal mechanism to place Rocket Lab into an elite "vendor pool", Instead of a big payout upfront, it gives them the official clearance to compete for big orders down the line alongside SpaceX.
What is SB-AMTI?
According to the Space Force news release, SB-AMTI stands for Space-Based Airborne Moving Target Indicator.
The Mission: Historically, tracking enemy aircraft, drones, and cruise missiles required flying large, vulnerable radar planes (like AWACS) through heavily defended airspace. SB-AMTI moves this capability entirely into space using a vast network of low-Earth orbit satellites.
Sooo...the goal is to eliminate military blind spots and create a global, un-blindable tracking system that operates at the "speed of relevance."
u can read more about that shit here:
but the key line is this:
that companies were selected into that framework through previously awarded OTAs,established a new SB-AMTI vendor pool
Sooo connecting the unconected (sorry wrong sub) the dots :
You can confidently link Rocket Lab's small contract to this major tracking program by looking at how perfectly its digital paper trail matches the multi-billion-dollar contract given to SpaceX.
The Matching Codes (PIIDs): 1st and 2nd pic PIIDs start with FA24.....and they are basically the same code, but the last 2 digits! The codes are nearly sequential, meaning they were processed out of the exact same government program pipeline most likely
The Same Contracting Office: Both documents show the exact same funding office: FA2401 - Space Development Agency / Space Systems Command.
2nd pic, SpaceX’s contract was signed on March 23 of 2026, while rklb's 1st pic contract was signed just one day later on March 24, 2026
What happened afterward
A few months later, the Space Force announced a $4.16 billion SB-AMTI award to SpaceX and disclosed that it had created a new SB-AMTI vendor pool. The announcement specifically says the government is using a multi-vendor framework and that numerous companies were selected through earlier competitive OTAs.
While Rocket Lab's specific details are restricted on public databases, the SpaceX system overview in pic 3, explicitly labels the Government Description for this exact contract series as "Sb-amti", its the small letters in the center.
Other Transaction Agreement (OTA): The military uses tiny token dollar amounts to legally bind a company to a broader program framework. It essentially establishes them as a vetted, capable supplier.
The Space Force press release explicitly highlights a "new SB-AMTI vendor pool." This initial contract is the government onboarding Rocket Lab into that group.
The military has openly stated they want a diversified pool of traditional and non-traditional vendors so they do not rely on any single provider. Now that Rocket Lab is officially inside the pool....i mean they have to get even a tiny fraction
so ya...the 10k, which in my original post which i thought it was 10mil, seems to be a formal invitation to new monies, to a space tracking market, hopefully making 10mil seem like pennies.
ya i used AI obviously i aint that smart for all this wall of text. so u have to double check things
u/pakis54 — 2 months ago
▲ 4 r/Soldier76Mains
Minor Perks
Why is everyone picking Helix Propulsion instead of taxtical salvo? what am i missing?
u/pakis54 — 2 months ago
▲ 2 r/ShadowBan
Have i been banned?
Hello, i have no clue if my acc got silenced? banned? or if there is something else going on...i dont see any rules violation or email from reddit, is there any way to know what kind of punishment i even got?
u/pakis54 — 2 months ago
▲ 195 r/RKLB
Nine years ago today, we launched Electron for the first time.
Nine years ago today, we launched Electron for the first time.
Later this year, Electron is expected to reach 100 launches, likely making it the fastest privately developed orbital rocket to hit that milestone.
From “It’s a test” to one of the world’s highest cadence launch vehicles in under a decade.
Here's a little walk down memory lane from that first historic launch.
u/pakis54 — 3 months ago
▲ 71 r/RKLB
Rocket Lab Post-Q1 Interview with Founder/CEO Sir Peter Beck and CFO Adam Spice
youtube.comu/pakis54 — 3 months ago
Not dispaying Afterhours in real time?
Was there a change in the app? i cant see after hours movements of stocks in real time, or did i press something and faked things up?
u/pakis54 — 3 months ago
▲ 293 r/RKLB
https://reddit.com/link/1t5qq3j/video/toibl03i0lzg1/player
TL;DR: The Pentagon is planning a massive 200-satellite "attack/interceptor" network.
SpaceX is reportedly backing out of the weaponized side of this.
Meanwhile, Rocket Lab has formed a strategic partnership with Raytheon for
Space-Based Interceptors, and their leadership dropped some thinly-veiled hints in an interview 1 year ago(!) about highly classified ("black") constellation programs of exactly that size.
Ok so here is what we know:
Raytheon, partnering with Rocket Lab, has been selected to demonstrate advanced capabilities for the United States Space Force’s Space Based Interceptor program.
The program is an important step in strengthening national missile defense capabilities.
+
On January 27,2025,Executive Order (EO) 14186was published stating:
“The threat of attack by ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles, and other advanced aerial attacks, remains the most catastrophic threat facing the United States.”
To address this threat, as directed by the Deputy Secretary of War, in coordination with the Golden Dome of America (GDA) Direct Reporting Program Manager (DRPM), the United States Space Force (USSF) established the Space-Based Interceptor (SBI) program, which is tasked to develop a space-based missile defense interceptor system that will demonstrate capability integrated into the Golden Dome of America (GDA) architecture by 2028.
Back in Aug 29, 2025, Richard French, Vice President - Business Development and Strategy, Space Systems for Rocket Lab, had an interview (video above)
The hosts ask about how scalable their satellite bus manufacturing actually is, specifically throwing out the number "200" and asking if they could sell 200 tomorrow.
Richard French immediately states they could do that, for customers needing spacecraft for "dynamic space operations" targeting things in the upper atmosphere and that something like that might or might not be discussed at this very moment back then in august 2025!
He then says these capabilities "might be described by a color."
In the defense world, a program described by a color is a euphemism for a "Black Program" (highly classified/top secret).
The interviewers immediately start laughing and smiling. It's a clear "wink and nod" moment.
He goes on to emphasize their "constellation class manufacturing" and how their assembly line is built to "Kaizen" the problem at every stage, aka "Kaizen a problem" means applying the Japanese philosophy of continuous, incremental improvement to solve inefficiencies, defects, or waste within a process, allowing them to pump out these units rapidly.
back then this was posted on sam .gov
"Geosynchronous Reconnaissance & Surveillance Constellation (RG-XX) Industry Day"
https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/88d72b7181d340cbb206017b3be82e0e/view
which now is inactive, but this pic below is the important part
so the interviewers were very aware of this program, which me personally had no idea, so that whole thing went over my head,
the other important part of course is, Space-X is stepping away from the kinetic/interceptor side creates a massive, multi-billion-dollar vacuum.
The DOD needs a manufacturer with constellation-class scaling capabilities to fill that void.
enter Raytheon!
Pentagon wants to build a tracking constellation, but the crucial detail is the separate fleet of 200 attack satellites armed to bring down enemy missiles.
In the public announcement, Raytheon confirmed they have been selected to demonstrate advanced capabilities for the US Space Force's Space Based Interceptor program.
Rocket Lab is building that shit it seems, sorry my presentation is not very good, these things basically evolved in this there were bids/and ideas for other things, obviously real details were kept secret from us, like there was this:
Space Force to select multiple companies for new geostationary satellite surveillance network
https://spacenews.com/space-force-to-select-multiple-companies-for-new-geostationary-satellite-surveillance-network/
like who know what happened with this...
anyways
You can re-watch the entire video interview on youtube here:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=50xR3qOCxPQ
if u want to chase the story down the rabbit hole trypotran on twitter is ur man:
https://xcancel.com/um87777/status/2052089404273881555
u/pakis54 — 4 months ago