r/RKLB
Rocket Lab Europe, 3 Billion ATM equity raise and Germany touts pan-German space command amid European push to supplant US tech!
I also think that capital is needed to purchase production equipment to ramp thru put at recent acquisitions.
I reviewed the SpaceX IPO docs and would prefer to buy more RKLB shares
Been reviewing the SpaceX IPO documents and, honestly, their business is more underwhelming than I anticipated. xAI is a big reason why. Here's my take:
Starlink segment: Starting with the good, Starlink is a truly excellent business. Revenue is growing and the margins are amazing. It's truly a cash cow with fantastic operating leverage.
Space segment: Revenue grew a total of 14.6% from 2023 to 2025, and the 1Q26 data suggest revenue could be down meaningfully in 2026 compared to 2025. Meanwhile R&D expenses from 1Q2026 are on pace to be 24% higher in 2026 compared to 2025. Just how bad was Q1? Their operating losses in 1Q2026 exceeded their entire operating loss for all of 2025.
AI segment: The AI side is far worse. Revenue grew a total of 10% from 2023 to 2025, and the 1Q26 data suggest revenue will be flat in 2026 compared to 2025. On the expense side, capex is much higher than revenue. Capex was $5.6B in 2024, $12.7B in 2025, and in 1Q26 $7.7B. No operating leverage visible here.
Balance sheet and runway: Starlink is essentially subsidizing these other businesses but they are still spending more than they are making overall. Looking at their balance sheet, their cash decreased from $24.75B to $15.85B from the end of 2025 to 1Q26 (about $9B in one quarter). In terms of debt, they have $29.1B, which was mostly used to build data centers. Their total assets are much higher than this debt but you don't want to be caught selling assets to make debt payments in the future. Point being, there's not much runway and they NEED the IPO cash to continue operating and spending big on these various projects. This is clearly the 'why' behind why they are IPOing now.
Valuation: If you focus only on the Starlink segment and give it a P/S of 200, which is expensive but not unheard of in today's market, you'd have a $640B MC. The space segment combined with Starlink segment would be more than palatable at those levels since it enables the Starlink business (despite the former being money losing and potentially contracting in revenue in 2026). You could also argue a premium on top of the $640B is warranted for the progress made on Starship to-date but future cost savings from Starship isn't a sure-thing yet. That said, it's really tough for me to see how the AI segment is a value add on top of these two segments given the AI segment's flat to barely growing revenue and the fact that they are selling excess compute to a competitor because not enough people like using their models. As far as I'm concerned, this is a failed business segment searching for a pivot. Maybe they can salvage it somehow but tough to see and far from certain. IMO, $1.75T is highly speculative and assumes near certain success with Starship, xAI/data centers in space, etc. and places a large Elon premium on the overall business.
To be clear, SpaceX IPO could still soar, we all know the cult of Elon is strong, but I will not be participating in it for the reasons mentioned above. On the plus side, my conviction in RKLB has only increased. IMO, Sir Peter Beck has a clearer vision for the company, and I see the path to profitability. Look forward to adding to my position.
Edit: To fix a few numbers. And yes, I acknowledge the Anthropic deal will help the AI segment. Keep in mind either party can walk with 90 days notice
Potential Acquisitions
Any input on if the recent $3B offering will be put towards acquisitions?
If so, what do you guys think of this list:
$BKSY ~$1.68B — best fit, right size, existing relationship
$SPIR ~$686M — cheapest, fills ground/data gap, distressed enough to be motivated
$SATL ~$1.39B — EO data layer, beaten-down valuation
$RDW ~$2.94B — best hardware fit, but losses are a problem
I currently hold two of them, and wondering if I should add to them or shotgun them all. 😆
SpaceX SEC filing
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000162828026036936/spaceexplorationtechnologi.htm
They have estimates their TAM to be 22 trillion USD. Very bullish for Rocket labs future potential if accurate.
Rocket Lab (RKLB) files $3.0B at-the-market shelf with forward hedges
stocktitan.netSpaceX S-1 Filing
Here is the link to SpaceX’s S-1 filing.
I thought this would be a good place for us to discuss anything interesting in the filing or any relevant information to Rocket Lab now that we have a more transparent view into SpaceX.
RKLB putting final touches on Neutron booster assembly - coming together nicely 🚀
SpaceX IPO will not suck liquidity away from RKLB
In my opinion, a future SpaceX IPO will not “kill” Rocket Lab.
Actually, I believe it could validate the entire space sector and bring even more institutional capital into it.
Here is why.
First, SpaceX is becoming so large that many investors will see it almost like “space infrastructure” itself.
Starlink, Starship, defense contracts, launch, satellites, communications, lunar logistics, government partnerships…this is evolving into an entire industrial ecosystem, not just a launch company.
That means many investors looking for higher growth potential may still rotate toward smaller players like Rocket Lab.
It is similar to what happened in tech:
• Amazon did not kill Shopify
• NVIDIA did not kill AMD
• Microsoft did not kill Palantir
Large ecosystems often create space for specialized and faster-growing players.
And honestly, I believe Neutron has a very strong positioning opportunity.
Why?
Because the launch market does not want a single provider forever.
Governments do not want dependency.
Defense agencies do not want dependency.
Commercial operators do not want dependency.
The global launch market is simply becoming too strategic.
In my opinion, Neutron sits exactly in the sweet spot between:
• Falcon 9 heavy capability
• lower operational complexity
• partial reusability
• responsive launch
• vertically integrated satellite manufacturing
And this last point is massively underestimated.
Rocket Lab is not only building a rocket.
It is building an integrated space company:
• launch
• satellites
• space systems
• components
• defense exposure
• software
• mission operations
That creates sticky customer relationships.
I also believe many customers do not need Starship-level payloads.
A huge portion of the market will still require:
• medium lift
• faster cadence
• dedicated missions
• lower integration complexity
• more flexible scheduling
And that is exactly where Neutron can compete.
Especially if launch demand explodes because of:
• defense constellations
• sovereign space programs
• Earth observation
• AI-driven satellite demand
• space-based communications
The reality is that the space economy is probably becoming too large for one company alone.
SpaceX may dominate the very heavy segment.
But I believe Rocket Lab has a real opportunity to become the “next major strategic space infrastructure company” in the medium launch and integrated orbital systems market.
Why are we still down in pre market while other stocks are rebounding?
Anything to be concerned about?
I know why the stock is tumbling
Because I bought it yesterday. Sorry guys
New Investor
I just started investing in RKLB. It's already at a high price. I'm thinking I'll start DCA in RKLB soon. Any other recommendations?
Is anyone able to explain what this point in the shareholder vote means ?
Adam Spice Needham Conf. May 14, 2026
https://vimeo.com/1193395491?fl=pl&fe=sh
Electron & Neutron Fixed Costs
- Electron fixed costs $40M/year (~$2M/launch)
- Neutron fixed costs $80M/year
- 2029 target: 10 Neutron launches, $8M fixed costs per launch
- Target 20x launches per Neutron body
Neutron vs. Falcon 9
- Forecasts growing ASP (Average selling price) for Neutron
- Neutron $50-55M vs Falcon 9 $77-78M
- Falcon 9 commercial launches are mostly volume limited, not mass
- Only area Falcon 9 is better is loads over 13ton but less than 16.5ton; all others Neutron is better value
- Sunsetting Falcon 9 would be upside but not factored into model
Rocket Lab vs. Competitors
- Small launch: Closest is Firefly but unreliable/unavailable;
- Stoke Space: Lots of trade offs with reusable upperstage
- Medium launcher market = SpaceX and Rocket Lab only competitors.
- Doubtful about Eclipse reusability and cost competitiveness; don’t think about it as competitor
- Impressed with Blue Origin. Watching commercial vs. internal demand
- Drawbridge being brought up for launch entrants
Space Systems
- More M&A coming (Looking at beam steerable arrays, PAs, signal generators, encryption solutions)
- Constellation could be greenfield (built in house) or acquisition. No Neutron capacity for internal demand until 2029 so SHORT TERM FOCUS (Until 2029) is JV/Partnership/inorganic comms and larger/organic comms systems in 2029+