There is a fundamental truth to reality because the truth is a description about reality. Without humans reality will still operate but without reality human wouldn’t operate.
Truth is a description of reality and is mostly outside the control of humans. It is skill issue and luck to find the truth.
My morality is dictated by my philosophy and my philosophy is dictated by logic in action. My logic is dictated by interplay between deductive and inductive reasoning. My deductive reasoning is dictated by facts held true. My inductive reasoning is dictated by awareness and pattern recognition.
If you image the possibility of future as strings or road, dao of x would be possible path that leads to x. Enlightenment would be alignment of the current path with dao of x. There 2 optimal path of dao of x. First is flow going with the path with the highest efficiency. Second is force of nature against your will.
I don’t read books about Taoism but here my understanding and or a unique perspective.
Data = raw facts or sensory inputs ->
Information = data with context ->
Pattern = recognizing relationships between information->
Knowledge = understanding the pattern->
Applied knowledge = acting on understanding ->
Experience = accumulating applied knowledge->
Wisdom = deep contextual judgement->
Intelligence = the cognitive functions for step and transition
Don’t think just speak. Accept the uncertainty. Allow the flow of information to come from the subconscious guided by first words of the sentence, image in your mind eye, hold previous ideals, concepts, and context. You can train this like you train a ai and even the black box model works because you control the input but not the process. Every conscious act even allowing the flow of information because part of subconscious processing.
Only flaw is that it is highly reactive to emotions and emotional regulation is a must.
Pros are speaking cost less due to less filter on output of thought.
Drink then practice walking to increase your balance. Smoke weed and study. Play Fps game where you have to keep track of lot of data in high stress situations then play through the anxiety. Artificially lower your baseline then do work to increase the baseline.
The goal for mental models is to use a donor information cluster that is easy to understand and prop up a complex topic that you’re trying to understand.
Mental model : Mind Garden
Plants = thoughts
Soil = knowledge + experience^ context
Weather = emotions
Time = emotional regulation
Weeds = intrusive thoughts
Out of everything I’ve learned I think this statement has the highest % of being true.
Truth can’t contradict truth.
What is a statement that you would hold up that has highest % of being true?
There’s an objective truth about x but the chances that you hold a 100% truth is lowest probability. To increase the probability of finding the truth about x you need to find people who are honestly searching for truth or start with a statement with the highest chance of the truth then build from there. To be 100% certain is to be all knowing and we are only human.
Is truth the highest form of enlightenment?
Is truth the path of least resistance?
If delusion and enlightenment is real then it stands to reason that enlightenment doesn’t constitute truth by transformation of the mind. Given the current nature of enlightenment is centered around subjective axis it has the highest chances of being false.
Trust your subconscious and provide no internal feedback beside labeling at first.
A mirror facing an image of your goal. There a candle represents your will. The greater light the more the goal can transform into the opposite version in the mirror.
This is just the understanding of the problem.
What’s the solution?
Could quantum mechanics be frame rate of our dimension or reality? The effects of looking like there is something in all position already exists like a fan being recorded.
What if Standard Quantum Theory is wrong? A framework for reality’s "frame rate" and higher-dimensional stacking.
I know this breaks the rules of no ai but I’m using ai as tool to test my theory at worst it’s food for thought.