
u/pmv143

These models are now 90% off. For good.
We’ve been experimenting with pricing for a while, and we’re making the 90% discount permanent on these models:
• Qwen3.8 27B FP8
• Qwen3.6 35B A3B FP8
• Qwen3 Coder Next FP8
• Gemma 4 31B IT FP8
• GPT-OSS 20B
• Devstral 2 123B
Not a weekend promo. These prices are staying.
Hope this makes it a little cheaper to build and experiment.
Turns out ‘most popular model’ depends entirely on where you’re asking
Ran our top model rankings against OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway for the last 30 days. Same open-weight models available everywhere, completely different top 10s depending on the platform.
DeepSeek wins across the board — no surprise there. But after that it splits hard. GLM 5.3 Flash is our clear #2, barely shows up on Vercel. Kimi K3 shows up on Vercel’s list, nowhere near ours.
Chart attached. Curious what other platforms/inference providers are seeing — is this workload-driven, community-driven, or just noise at this sample size?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 90% off on InferX this weekend
We’re doing a little Weekend Inference.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 90% off on InferX for the weekend.
No big announcement. Just cheaper tokens for anyone who wants to build, benchmark, or burn through some context.
Have fun. 😎
Try here.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is now free to use on InferX
Yes. We’re making DeepSeek V4.1 Flash free to use on InferX.
V4.1 is a massive model with some impressive capabilities, and we want more people to experience it on their own workloads.
Benchmarks only tell you so much. So we’re opening it up for free and letting you see how it actually performs for you.
Build with it. Code with it. Push it.
Let us know what you think of V4.1 Flash.
Update: we’ve made it free for 48 hours and some tremendous response that our cluster got overwhelmed. It’s now available at 60% off. Cheaper than any provider out there. Try it out.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is now live on InferX
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is available now on InferX at 60% off.
Pricing:
Input: $0.12 / 1M tokens
Output: $0.48 / 1M tokens
Cached input: $0.0024 / 1M tokens
Model: deepseek-v4.1-flash
Would love to hear how it performs on your coding and agent workloads.
Try here
GLM-5.3 Flash might actually dethrone DeepSeek v4 Flash
We’ve been serving both DeepSeek and GLM-5.3 Flash on InferX, and GLM-5.3 Flash is quickly becoming one of our most interesting workloads.
Over the last 24 hours, we’re seeing roughly a 94% cache hit rate(next closest is 89% on OpenRouter) on GLM-5.3 Flash across real production traffic, not a single synthetic workload.
We’re also currently serving it at 70% off the standard price.
DeepSeek has dominated open-model inference traffic for a while, but based on what we’re seeing, I think GLM-5.3 Flash has a real shot at dethroning it.
GLM-5.3 Flash just became the #1 model on our platform . We’re seeing 95%+ cache hits.
GLM-5.3 Flash has officially overtaken DeepSeek as the most-used model on InferX.
Over the last 24 hours:
44,030 requests
2.69B prompt tokens
2.56B cached tokens
95.4% cache hit rate
And we’re currently serving GLM-5.3 Flash at 70% off our listed price.
Pretty interesting to watch the shift happen in real time. DeepSeek had been our top model, but GLM-5.3 Flash usage has now passed it.
More free models on InferX. Here’s how we’re running them efficiently.
The more, the merrier. We’ve added more free models to InferX:
- Gemma 4 31B FP8
- GPT-OSS 20B
- Qwen3.6 35B A3B FP8
- Agents A1
- Devstral 2 123B
- Qwen3 Coder Next FP8
The interesting part isn’t just that they’re free. It’s how we’re serving them.
Instead of dedicating a GPU to every model and keeping it warm 24/7, InferX can keep models off GPU while idle, bring them up with sub-second cold starts when requests arrive, and scale them back to zero when demand disappears.
That lets us run more models on the same GPU infrastructure while keeping utilization high.
Everything is served through the InferX secure container runtime.
This is also the same runtime we can deploy on your GPUs. If you have idle or underutilized GPU capacity and want to try it, DM us.
More free models coming.
So with the Nvidia/HF news today, this story felt relevant.
A couple months ago I cold-messaged Clement with a two-line pitch , get every HF model online with fast cold starts, without dedicating a GPU to each one. He replied almost immediately, sent his number, said call me right now. We ended up talking through a partnership. We were still pretty early back then.
Fast forward to now, still chasing the same thing. HF is an incredible registry but less than 1% of what’s hosted actually gets served . if that changes, at a fraction of the cost, that’s a big unlock for the whole open-source/dev community.
Anyway, felt like a fun coincidence given today’s news.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp now live on InferX — 40% off
deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp is now available, 40% off.
Matches DeepSeek V4 Flash on text (agents, reasoning, world knowledge), adds vision on top. On multimodal agent benchmarks, it’s a big step up from the base model — close to Opus-4.8 territory.
OpenAI-compatible, drop-in endpoint swap: inferx.net
2.38B input tokens, 27.5K tok/s, 95% cache hit rate — 24-hour GLM-5.3 Flash endurance test
Ran a 24-hour endurance test on GLM-5.3 Flash on InferX. Sustained numbers from the run:
- Throughput: 27,500+ input tokens/sec
- Requests: 34K+ completed
- Cache hit rate: 95%
- Volume: 2.38 billion input tokens
The cache hit rate is the interesting part — by holding 95%, we're skipping most of the repeated attention work agents generate when they resend context. Same hardware, far less recompute per follow-up request.
For context, per OpenRouter's own provider data, that's the highest cache hit rate of any provider running GLM-5.3 right now — ahead of Z.ai, the model's official host, at 89.0%.
How Qwen3.8-Flash-Next could actually be local-friendly
A lot of people are questioning the “local-friendly” claims because RAM prices are insane right now. Fair point.
Here’s the actual reason some of us are still saying it:
The model has a big ~51B n-gram table on top of the main MoE. That table is only sparsely accessed — the model just hashes the recent tokens, pulls a few vectors, and injects them. So a large portion of the total size can realistically be offloaded to system RAM instead of sitting in VRAM.
That changes the hardware picture. Instead of needing pure high-VRAM cards or full datacenter iron, it becomes more practical on:
• 128GB+ unified memory machines
• Multi-GPU setups with a solid amount of system RAM
You’re still looking at serious money, but for a model with this kind of capacity and only ~6B active parameters, the offload potential is what makes the “local-friendly” label make sense relative to other frontier options.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next. This architecture could be surprisingly local-friendly once the weights drop. 👀
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (~125B-A6B + 51B n-gram) memory estimate:
Ideal 4-bit quant ≈ 82 GB
(58 GB main weights + 24 GB n-gram tables)
Real-world quants likely land in the 80–90 GB range.
The big n-gram table is sparsely accessed → excellent candidate for system RAM offload.
This architecture could be surprisingly local-friendly once the weights drop.
Qwen 3.8 27B free for the next 72 hours on InferX
Running Qwen 3.8 27B completely free for the next 72 hours — no catch, just want more people to try it out.
Quick note: this is shared infrastructure, so performance may vary depending on load. Zero data retention on all requests.