Funniest meltdown?
What’s the funniest meltdown we’ve seen so far in the Larsonverse
What’s the funniest meltdown we’ve seen so far in the Larsonverse
I’d say probably Daniel McDougall or Quandale Dingle
I wanna show this to my barber. This is my yearbook photo from about two years ago. What would be the official term for this haircut/hairstyle.
I’m considering getting rhinoplasty. Verification in last slide. Any criticism is welcome
Be objective and honest. (Im considering rhinoplasty before u ask yeah). Just looking for some advice on grooming, possible surgery maybe, idk anything. Thanks guys !
I am so guilty. I won’t go into great depths. But last night I had a revenge fantasy dream with me, Nick and Judy along with Gary Nibbles and I think clawhauser was there spectating too (however he was too busy filling his fat f*ck with donuts to join in).
Basically, the group dragged Pawbert out of prison towards a set of pillories, his arms and his head locked in place. We then began to humiliate him, throwing fruits and vegetables at him. This turned into pebbles and later rocks.
He kept begging for forgiveness and pleading for mercy. I think I even saw a few tears shed by him. I turned to my right and I saw Judy. Her face looked so determined and focused. Then all of sudden she let out such a big belly laugh. It was the first time I’ve witnessed such joy in my life. She looked so evil. Then she turns to Nick and begins to kiss him in front of a captive Pawbert.
Pawberts face was nothing but what I can describe horrified. It was something out of a horror film.
Later, Judy and Nick drag him to Sahara central where a large audience of mammals and reptiles have formed. They begin a competition where kids have a whack-a-mole like sledgehammer and thwack a weight of some sort which causes a large bell-like thingy to strike Pawbert in the private region. Like something out of this scene (Timestamp 1:20) https://youtu.be/e88Y3hlDCsA?si=UJUwE_zbQYEmuTyH
Then I woke up and I was shaken. I’m thinking of seeing a psychiatrist. I Ofc hate Pawbert a lot for the crimes he did but I think this it too much of a punishment. Prison is enough. He doesn’t deserve this kind of treatment. Zootopia isn’t North Korea.
We aren’t actually shown Nick and Judy’s parents interacting like at-all during the premise of both films.
Yeah sure, they acknowledge his existence in the sequel when Judy is face timing them, and also the Hopps family is invited to Reptile Ravine in Gary’s house and Nick is present. However, I find it strange that the writers never actually wrote in one or two lines between Nick and Bonnie and Stu. Not even an acknowledgment. Do you guys think they have? I imagine Nick would cool down the snarky witty charisma he usually pulls with Judy and other mammals for the sake of trying to look his best or make a good impression.
What do you guys think?
In this alternate scenario. Both Nick and Judy lived in Bunnyburrow and attended the same school. So he would’ve been at the school play, perhaps on the stage or somewhere in the audience. He also would’ve been present when Gideon Grey bullies her sheep friend and eventually scratches Judy in the face. And presumably the whole Boy Scout incident would’ve occurred in Bunnyburrow too, so Judy, if being Nicks friend, would’ve known about this.
I’m under the assumption, since Judy’s parents would’ve retained their Fox-phobia (before Gideon’s redemption), if Judy and Nick were friends, they probably wouldn’t have approved of it.
Do you guys think they would’ve been friends? Or perhaps Nick would’ve been in the same circle as Gideon? Maybe popular but a slacker, I’m thinking a Marty McFly sorta character.
EDIT: Oh yeah forgot to mention also, in this hypothetical there isn’t an age gap, both Nick and Judy are the same age, so they would’ve been around 24-25 by the time Zootopia is set.
I think Anne Hathaway sorta shares the same features looks-wise. They both have large expressive eyes. I think Natalie Portman too maybe in the sense they’re both incredibly smart, independent and career-driven. What do you guys think? I put Ellie Kemper from the office too lol because idk Erin sorta has that quirky personality but Judy ain’t as dim as her.
Would it be considered unusual or perhaps weird to find them attractive? Since they’re not actually animals in the sense they’re anthropomorphic, so they have human characteristics. What other explanations are there?
Will they just retcon the fact there is this separate state or nation controlled by birds. Or will it be a rehash of the reptile plot again? What do you think
There are multiple instances in the film where Nick reveals his stomach. The first image for example, but also in the promos etc and the two films. This usually occurs in action scenes where Nick falls or stumbles causing his loosely fit aloha shirt to expose his stomach underneath.
So clearly the animators don’t have a problem with this. This isn’t an overly sexualised theme either as multiple other studios are fine with this attire, like Diane Foxington wearing a sports bra in The Bad Guys 2.
Other films directed towards a mature perhaps family audience are also fine with revealing attire, for example Natalie Portman/Padme Amidala in the Star Wars trilogy where her midriff is exposed.
However, clearly the animators have been weary about showing Judy’s midriff. So why is this?
In the third photo which occurs during the train derailment scene in the first film, there are a lot of scenes in which Judy’s checkered shirt moves up which reveals underneath, however she is wearing a secondary layer, seemingly a pink tank top of some sorts which covers her stomach. This again is apparent during the Natural history museum scene.
Realistically, I would find it uncomfortable if I had a tank top tucked into my jeans, particularly during an action heavy scenario where you are required to move around a lot, a loosely fit attire would be more suitable, no?
Furthermore, Judy’s apartment apparently is located in Savannah Central. The savannah biome is notoriously very warm and dry, and Judy sleeps in a very long loose fitting sleepwear. Would this not get uncomfortable too? It would be more comfortable or convenient to wear maybe something more revealing like a sports bar or a crop top.
Judy also gets wet and drenched on multiple occasions throughout the franchise. She falls into a pool of ice cold water in her training sequence. In the rainforest scene she gets wet too as well as the scene where they break into the hideout where the night howler subjugated animals are in captivity after jumping into a toilet and falling down the waterfall. She also gets wet in the sequel too when jumping into the waterway/pipe system and nearly drowning. My reason for mentioning this is that practically, if a shirt gets soaked in water, it would be revealing the body underneath. However Judy’s clothes seemingly remained opaque even after having been subjected to water.
Then we get into the sequel, the animators clearly had a lot more Fun and creativity in animating Judy’s clothing. Firstly we get the opening scene where Judy and Nick wakes up. We see Nick wearing a vest to sleep, so why doesn’t Judy? Why are the animators so reluctant to have her wear a more revealing attire to bed? I think the most revealing clothing the animators have designed for her are the towel, when she’s getting ready for work, and also the Mom outfit in the undercover scene at the port. The towel exposes her shoulders and the upper portion of her chest and the mom outfit in a later sequence also shows her upper arms and also a bit of her underarms and the side of her chest too. However this is a very loosely fitting and relaxed attire, so presumably her midriff would be able to be shown especially during the action sequences later on when she jumps off the car, or maybe when she’s stretching upwards to try and unlock the crate filled with capnip? Apparently not since she’s also wearing leggings are elevated to the point which cover that portion of her body. The closest we have ever gotten to see Judy’s stomach or midriff is like one or two frames where if you zoomed in enough you could barely make it out and this is only because she jumps and lunges herself out the car and into the police van.
Anyways, I really hope the animators are less prudish when it comes to the next film and have the guts to put Judy in more revealing attire. Perhaps a crop top. Dreamworks have no problem with it so clearly it’s a Disney problem.
How would he react would he be happy sad jealous?
It’s essentially semi-canon now; the writers teased it at the end of the second film, as well as the multitude of innuendos and hints scattered throughout the franchise, the promos. As well as the fact that most if not all the main cast, directors and producers have publicly expressed their support or at least haven’t ruled out the possibility of it.
Yet, these people still aggressively attempt to push the narrative of them being friends or outright denying the obvious all over twitter, Reddit, TikTok. Why? Why are they so adamant behind their delusional belief even after essentially being de-facto ostracised from the fandom.
Perhaps maybe there’s some sort of psychological reason behind it. Is it some sort of self loathing or insecurity? Maybe it’s the idea that, if they (the anti-Wildhopps) can’t have them, nobody can sorta mentality. Essentially self-inserts who take it to the extreme. I’ve also seen a lot of people try to project their sexuality onto either Judy or Nick, but it’s mostly Nick. So this could also be an underlying factor.