u/sanstaleyy

hello, so in my FNAF 4 analysis, I made the argument that while the box doesn't really matter anymore I think it would have contained items that would have linked foxy bro to all the other 3 games (when there are things that already hinted at this like the phantoms in FNAF 3, and FNAF 4 gameplay seems to reference FNAF 1 - 3).

more specifically Mike paycheck, Fritz fire order, frights newspaper and the foxy mask.

and now, while I was reading Ch2 of TSE, I encountered some interesting quotes from Aunt Jen such as "Some things, some memories, are best left undisturbed" and "Live in the present moment" and "Don’t dwell on the past".

now this next thing could be a stretch and me reading too much into it, but I really like how there is some similarities between these quotes and what foxy bro say in the box scene, both are about leaving the past behind, leaving things forgotten because they may hurt you if you dwell on them.

and I think with my interpretation it makes perfect sense (to me), of Couse Foxy bro won't like to open the box and see his past, the tragedy he caused and how he tried to fix it. but what do you guys think? am I reaching? or is this a fair interpterion?

Well, there you have it, a FNAF 4 analysis in the best of my abilities.

I know It's not perfect, but even if you don't agree with me, I hope I gave you something to think about or, at the very least, a good read!

Sadly, I have a bit of bad news, this series will be put on hold at the moment, the next step will be "The Silver Eyes" but not only that book is HUGE to do a full analysis on, but I am starting my final exams next month so I will be quiet busy.

Anyway, until next time, enjoy my other posts if you haven't already:

FNAF 1:

https://www.reddit.com/r/fnaftheories/s/05IgpvHciB

FNAF 2:

https://www.reddit.com/r/fnaftheories/s/Elx6di7QpE

FNAF 3:

https://www.reddit.com/r/fnaftheories/s/gwE9T3iNBy

like I don't want to say, "oh I 100% solved it" or anything, but the way I personally analyzed it, it was both fun and it made total sense to me, like genuinely I really liked the "Version" of the story I am theorizing about... I am gonna post my analysis on the theory sub in a few days I just need to make sure everything is correct!

Like bro didn't know Edwin was gonna make the mimic. He genuinely just saw 2 loving partners and chose violence 😭

This argument is really dumb for a few reasons.

So first of all, just because YOU don't like it, doesn't mean it's objectively bad.

And second of all, even if it IS bad, my argument to your argument would be "the writing is just bad" that's it 😭

Like FNAF is a game, we make the story by finding evidence and connect them together. You saying "nah uh" isn't evidence to be used against arguments lol.

I think most people at this point know we play as Mike in the night section of FNAF 4.

But what is your opinion on these 2? Especially when Scott was like "yeah BB fit the lore, so he is canon in this game now" while other fnaf 2 animatronics aren't.

I think I have an idea but I want to hear your opinions first.

it gives you this overwhelming feeling with how many interpretations you can fit in the narrative, and then you go outside the game and find Scott GTlive hints, and it adds to that feeling... it's kinda awesome as the game that was meant to be "The Final Chapter"

I hope you enjoy this because i didn't lol... idk, fnaf 3 secret minigames are real pain, and i am unironically waiting to analyze fnaf 4 minigames because I feel they would be more fun than these.

But anyway, as always, these aren't facts, just my observation. Feel free to agree or disagree with me, and yeah, go and read the other 2 posts if you haven't!

FNAF 1 analysis: https://www.reddit.com/r/fnaftheories/s/NNIRJt4DUt FNAF 2 analysis: https://www.reddit.com/r/fnaftheories/s/VCQ7fWSXHM

I am working on my FNAF 3 analysis, and I don't want to make this a habit asking you guys for help since those posts are supposed to be my own research and understanding of the lore.

But seriously, at the time of fnaf 3, what are we meant to take away from these? just creepy stuff for being creepy? Or these minigames are also haunted? I really don't understand them at all 😭

Let me start by saying I am ok with different interpretations, I do like it when people give more solutions to something.

But I just get confused when I see people discuss this minigame a lot as if we weren't told it's purpose already, like I am not crazy right? It's just the puppet giving life to the characters? But then there's something like GGGL HD that exists, and I am just like, "..... interesting..."

I do understand the arguments, though, and it's the fact people either taking all the minigames literally or non... and tbh, I think the solution is just both.

GGGL, foxy go, give cake, are all minigames that has high scores, instructions like a real game, that were just so happen to have lore in them (possibly from the kids haunting the arcades of these games maybe)

But something like Save them, is ment to be taken more literal because it's a detailed layout of the FNAF 2 location, it doesn't have a high score, the instruction are being told to you in the background.

I think with this in mind, the dreams from fnaf 2, more specifically, the one with the puppet is meant to be GGGL, with the animatronics standing still then getting creepier after the puppet gave them life.

But what do you guys think?

The other 3 are happening very close to the MCI, the investigation happening as soon as the kids were reported missing, and the blood coming from the animatronics telling us the kids are still in the suits BEFORE they were likely removed when the company wanted to retrofit them in FNAF 2.

This one, however, talks about the tragedy that happened years ago, and if we assume it's in the actual FNAF 1 location, it does make sense since the MCI would have been 5+ years old, and it's reflected in the game perfectly with the place looking kinda abandoned and it's says the place will shut down at the end of the year, probably after Mike gets fired immediately.

So I figured people would want MORE analysis posts like this, so have fun! I hope you guys enjoy this. It took longer than I thought it would, and I really don't want to know how many slides something like FNAF 4 will take 😭

But yeah, hopefully this will be useful as a source of information, and hey, if you agree with me, that's cool!

Oh, and I HIGHLY recommend reading my post about FNAF 1 since this is a continuation of it. If you dont want to, that's fine too lol:

https://www.reddit.com/r/fnaftheories/s/5fluzqHwvT

I thought it would be fun to go back and try to fully analyze FNAF 1, and I tried my best to include everything so people can go back to this at any time to get info from it.

And like even if you disagree with my conclusions, at least you can find all the points here and make your own assumptions and conclusions.

If people really liked this, I could do it to the other games/books... but for now, I just wanted to do FNAF 1 lol.

It's no secret at this point that the phone call was a paragraph from "autobiography of a yogi" do you think it was added just to be scary and add to the atmosphere and Scott was just a fan of the book.

Or do you think this was supposed to confirm from back then that the animatronics endoskeleton is what the souls possess.

Or do you have a whole other explanation, I am interested to hear your guys' opinions.

So I heard it was released. To anyone who checked it out, is there any new lore that was added?

Also, what's up with the game as a whole? I am hearing negative things about it, like what happened?