
Two months after Operation Epic Fury, Trump traded long-term strategic assets for short-term relief in Beijing.
Interesting piece arguing that the strategic cost of America’s Iran war is now showing up less in dollars or casualties than in the assets Washington may have to trade to manage the fallout: Taiwan arms deliveries, rare-earth access, chip policy and election-year timing.
Is this a useful way to think about great-power overstretch, not as immediate defeat, but as a loss of bargaining freedom in the next theater?