Today is the day
Today is the deadline for Duren and the QO so we will finally be reaching a conclusion to this whole thing one way or another. Thank god we will be done with all this very soon!
Today is the deadline for Duren and the QO so we will finally be reaching a conclusion to this whole thing one way or another. Thank god we will be done with all this very soon!
I'd be able to pay for his contract myself.
Yes, this is a very original joke for a very original post. Thank you.
What is everyone's best guess on what will finally be the resolution here? I'm guessing 4 years at an AAV of $39M, no options. What's your best guess? Does anyone think he'll actually take the QO? You think he will get more or less than what I'm guessing? More or less years?
There's only two options here. I don't want any nuance that comes between the two options. The thought exercise is about these two options only. You can give your supporting thoughts after.
First option: qualifying offer, 1 year 9.6 mill with an inherent no trade clause
Second option: full max 287 million over five years, roughly 57.4 per year.
Don't jump to strong conclusions. Bad performances are usually more predictive than strong performances, but even still we have seen some terrific players have bad performances. It's truly just not all that predictive.
Look for specific skills you wanna see, and let it be that. Don't overreact. Either way.
Edit: bad players have had good performances too fwiw. Fortnight dude was killing it in summer league for example.
This Jaylen Brown trade is getting so much coverage and so much criticism, any other move a GM might be worried about will go completely under the radar. Now is the time to capitalize on Brad Steven's taking the limelight haha
The Timberwolves explored multiple avenues to add another star next to Edwards in the days leading up to landing Ball. There were discussions with the Chicago Bulls about Josh Giddey. They had talks with the Boston Celtics about Jaylen Brown, a team source said, but the Celtics were looking for a package including Gobert, Reid and similar pick compensation that went to Charlotte for Ball, team sources said. That was just too much for the Wolves to pay for a soon-to-be 30-year-old forward who, while being a better overall player than Ball, wasn’t as clean a fit next to Edwards.
The Free Press has confirmed with multiple people within the league not permitted to speak publicly that the Pistons have been involved in discussions regarding Herro. And though it remains to be seen if the deal will get across the finish line, three of their key role players – Isaiah Stewart, Duncan Robinson and Ron Holland – are candidates to be moved in such a trade.
I think he would be the perfect complimentary player with Cade. He can score and defend at a high level. Should the Pistons get him or not?
I'm going to preface this by saying I am neither a CBA expert, nor a lawyer. So if someone who knows more about the CBA or is better at reading legal documents than I am, can (politely) correct me if I'm mistaken, then your corrections are welcome. Then we can all laugh at how dumb I was haha
I was thinking about how the Pistons could both retain Tobias Harris at a price that is reasonable for their roster moving forward, and simultaneously make the contract they offer him competitive with other hypothetically larger offers from other teams. One thing I thought about is offering him a no trade clause in exchange for a longer contract with a reduced Average Annual Value (AAV).
The trick here though is that to qualify for a no trade clause, a player must have both 8 years of league service, and 4 years of service with the team offering the contract. The CBA does NOT specify that these years of service must be consecutive, nor does it specify that these years of service have to be an entire league season (that I am aware of).
Tobias Harris has been under contract with the Pistons for the previous two seasons with the Pistons, but also was with the team after acquiring him at the 2016 trade deadline through to the 2018 deadline. This could theoretically give Tobias 5 years of service with Detroit, which would potentially qualify him for a no trade clause.
For reference, here is the CBA https://nbpa.com/cba and the no trade section is under article 24 on page 414 through page 417
Edit: I don't have twitter, but if someone who does have twitter wouldn't mind asking a cap person like Keith Smith about this, I would be interested to hear their answer.
FWIW the CBA defines a year of service as follows:
“Years of Service” means the number of years of NBA service
credited to a player in accordance with the following: a player will be
credited with one (1) year of NBA service for each year that he is on an
NBA Active List or Inactive List for one (1) or more days during the Regular
Season. "