More than $2.5 billion dollars in the hole. How did things get this bad?

Genuine question. I went digging through the Asset Management plans for the various CRD munis, those that exist. Seven munis don't have plans that record total infrastructure replacement cost, and Victoria doesn't record how much more they should be spending each year to catch up. I tallied total municipal revenue, total end of life infrastructure cost, and the estimated funding gap listed in local plans, then ranked municipalities by the end of life replacement cost divided by yearly revenue.

The total immediate or short term replacement cost for municipal infrastructure in the CRD is $2.5 billion dollars. That's enough to build a rapid transit system for the city.

Granted, a few of these asset management plans are on the older side, so no doubt some of this infrastructure has been repaired. But this number also doesn't factor in six municipalities, or any local infrastructure owned by non-municipal governments, including the harbour authority, the province, or the CRD.

What made me break out into a cold sweat is that these numbers do not include climate adaptation costs, this is only replacement costs for existing infrastructure that is at the end of life, eg. sewer mains from 1920 or water pipes from the 1940s. As far as I know, only Victoria has even started the process of tallying up the costs of climate adaptation locally.

Granted, sewer pipes don't keep most people up at night, but how has this problem been able to persist for so long? What can we do about it? And what questions on this would you want to see municipal candidates this election cycle answer?

u/tiogar99 — 3 months ago
▲ 60 r/LangfordBC+1 crossposts

“A failing grade on infill housing”: New Report Card Reveals Victoria Municipalities Are Falling Short of Provincial Minimum Standards

VICTORIA, BC — May 10, 2026 — A new analysis from Homes for Living (HFL), a volunteer group of housing affordability advocates, reveals that many Greater Victoria municipalities are failing to meet minimum provincial guidelines for legalizing small scale family-friendly infill housing in residential areas.

The Missing Middle Report Card shows a gulf between the Provincial intent to end apartment and townhome bans and the reality of local municipal implementation. Despite new provincial laws requiring local governments to allow townhomes, walk-up apartments, and other family housing, local zoning regulations show that local "poison pill" regulations are making this housing very difficult to build.

Homes for Living examined the zoning bylaws for each Urban Core and Westshore municipality and graded them against provincial guidelines. Saanich and Esquimalt came out on top, with a ‘B’ Grade. Two municipalities, Oak Bay and Colwood, received an ‘F’.

“We congratulate Saanich and Esquimalt for implementing their small scale housing bylaws largely in the spirit of the province’s guidelines,” says Leo Spalteholz, a housing researcher and President of Homes for Living.”We urge them not to falter. That progress needs to be protected. Overall, our region would be in a better place for housing affordability if everyone copied their homework.”

While the province has mandated that four to six units be allowed on standard residential lots under the small-scale multi-unit housing initiative, the Missing Middle Report Card illustrates how municipalities are legalizing the number of units but limit the size and shape of buildings or number of parking spaces to such a high degree that they are impossible to build.  Parking spaces can add more than $100,000 per space to the cost of a new home, according to a report by Altus Group. 

Sam Holland, Director with Homes for Living and developer of the report card notes: “The province set a floor, but local municipalities are treating this floor like a ceiling. It should not be more difficult to build a small multifamily home than to build a single family home on any lot in the Greater Victoria area, and overly restrictive rules will keep family-suitable homes expensive and in short supply.”

The Homes for Living project serves as a transparency tool for voters and local leaders. The Report Card specifically grades each municipality’s “Small-Scale Multi-Unit Housing” bylaw against provincial guidelines for legalizing family and starter homes such as townhomes, walk-up apartments, and houseplexes.

While prices have fallen somewhat in the last two years for studios and one-bedroom rentals, prices for three and four bedroom rentals have stayed high. Homes for Living argues that this is in part because of a continued reluctance to remove barriers to family housing in established neighbourhoods. “It’s a lot easier to build three and four bedroom homes in small apartment buildings as they naturally fit better as corner units,” says Spalteholz. “We need to tackle the enormous barriers to create these family homes or rents will stay high.”

homesforliving.ca
u/tiogar99 — 5 months ago
▲ 105 r/LangfordBC+1 crossposts

Race the Bus!

Better Transit YYJ is challenging Victoria's transit system to a foot race and we need YOU to help do that!

We're organizing runners (and walkers) to go from the BC Legislative Assembly to Victoria City Hall along Douglas Street, head-to-head against the “Rapid” bus 95, on June 12th at 4:45pm SHARP.

Douglas Street is the busiest transit corridors in Greater Victoria, with busses arriving as often as every two minutes. It connects government, commerce, and community. And yet, buses on this route are slowed by congestion and a lack of dedicated infrastructure. That leads to a transit experience that too often can't outpace a walk.

Transit should be a genuinely fast, reliable choice. We're calling on BC Transit and the City of Victoria to ensure that the bus always wins, by giving busses dedicated lanes and smart signals. Come join us in racing the bus!

https://actionnetwork.org/forms/volunteer-for-race-the-bus

u/BetterTransitYYJ — 5 months ago