Could event horizons be continuous matter-antimatter annihilation zones rather than gravitational point-singularities?
Hey guys, I been running a thought experiment through my head about black holes, speed of light, and antimatter, and wanted to get some feedback from people who know physics on where this makes sense and where it breaks down.
Here is how I got to this idea:
The Energy/Speed Problem - We know that as an object with mass gets close to light speed (c), the energy to keep accelerating it goes up exponentially and takes infinite energy to actually hit c. So even a huge gravitational pull shouldn't be able to push physical matter past the speed of light.
High-Energy Collisions & Gamma Rays - In super energetic environments, kinetic energy converts into matter and antimatter (pair production). When regular matter hits antimatter, they annihilate each other and put off high-energy gamma rays. We already see massive gamma ray bursts right outside black holes.
The Idea - What if a "black hole" is actually just a region where gravity is accelerating matter in the accretion disk so fast that particles collide and constantly create antimatter?
In this scenario:
The event horizon boundary isnt just curved space, but a dense region/core made of antimatter.
Matter and light "disappearing" into the hole is actually incoming matter slamming into this antimatter zone and instantly annihilating.
The gamma radiation we pick up around black holes is the direct energy signature of this constant annihilation.
I know standard General Relativity says the event horizon is just spacetime curvature leading to a singularity, and that antimatter has regular mass. But as a thought experiment, what are the main observational or theoretical reasons that rule out the horizon being a physical matter/antimatter annihilation boundary?
Curious to hear your thoughts.