u/wompt

Assuming anarchy is fundamentally negative - meaning it is concerned with negation - and that negation is born out of a reaction to archy; if anarchy is successful in negating archy, creating a world without it, what meaning does anarchy have in that world? with no archies to negate, wouldn't anarchy cease to exist?

almost everything I have read by self-described anarchists rejects power over others, but what of increasing capacity more broadly? i am particularly interested in the expansion of power (capacity to influence change) through technological advancement. should anarchy have a small-scale bias toward technology? can we have anarchy while giving everyone a personal nuke? what does increasing the capacity to enact change in the world mean for anarchy?