People who can't afford medical care for their pet should not own an animal
My wife is a vet & I've just read a post about a cat having worms and the owner being unable to afford the vet. Lots of sympathetic comments.
I get it. Times are hard and vet bills are expensive. But IMO if you cannot afford to provide medical care for your pet, you shouldn't own it.
I've heard various things:
"*But I rescued her!*"
Rescued how? She's in a really bad condition. Maybe don't drag her from the frying pan into the fire.
"*She is my one joy in life and you want to take her away*"
What about **the animal**? It doesn't exist to comfort and entertain you at the expense of it's own welfare.
This usually gets shot down as a classist thing - but if you don't have medical insurance (or significant funds to use in case), you should *not* own an animal.