I just got an alert while in the car that the update was available. Maybe they're commencing the rollout again?
It said the FSD version was 14.3.3 in the release notes. I don't think that's an updated version vs the earlier release. I wonder if they even changed anything?
I got a message "The Nikon Message Center 2 service has been terminated" in Message Center 2. This is on Windows 11. One way to interpret this is that a service on my PC has not started. Another way to interpret it (and I'm inclined to think this might be it) is that Nikon has stopped supporting the Nikon Message Center messaging tool.
Google found one other reference to it. Has anyone else got this message. Does anyone have any information about this?
I currently have a 16Gb RX9070xt. But I have also come into a 16GB nVidia card. Can llama.cpp (on Windows) use both cards at the same time?
My alternative is a 12GB RX6700xt - the one that the 9700xt replaced. Would that work.
Basically chasing more vram so I don't have to spill into system ram so much.
Can I order a 2nd 1000/100 FttP service if I have a four port NTD. I have the older one that only has gigabit ethernet.
Will it support a 2nd service that is that fast? Is there a capacity limit overall for these NTDs?
The idea is I want to test the new service before disconnecting the old.
If I do stay with the 2nd service and disconnect the 1st, does the 2nd service move to the 1st port, or does it just stay on the port it's on (probably port 2)?
This is all industrial, 600k city. I don't have any residential demand, but my industry needs workers. My residents are pretty educated, but many of these places are looking for educated people.
I haven't started a new city recently (well obviously), maybe that is the only solution.
I might let this latest patch sit for a while to see if anything settles, but this problem has existed for a while.
I am running the qwen3.6-35b-a3b Q4_K_M in LM Studio. I was asking it a question about a traceroute that I ran. After what seemed to be some productive "thinking" I got the following
I will follow this.
I will write the response.
I will not use code blocks for the text, just markdown.
I will use bolding.
I will use lists.
I will be polite.
I will be professional.
I will be accurate.
I will be helpful.
I will be concise.
I will be direct.
I will be clear.
I will be structured.
I will be consistent.
I will be relevant.
I will be insightful.
I will be complete.
I will be correct.
I will be timely.
I will be responsive.
I will be attentive.
I will be careful.
I will be precise.
I will be thorough.
I will be analytical.
I will be objective.
I will be neutral.
I will be informative.
I will be educational.
I will be explanatory.
I will be descriptive.
I will be illustrative.
I will be demonstrative.
I will be confirmative.
I will be affirmative.
I will be positive.
I will be constructive.
I will be supportive.
I will be encouraging.
I will be helpful.
I will be useful.
I will be valuable.
I will be beneficial.
I will be advantageous.
I will be profitable.
I will be rewarding.
I will be satisfying.
I will be fulfilling.
I will be gratifying.
I will be pleasing.
I will be delightful.
I will be enjoyable.
I will be entertaining.
I will be engaging.
I will be interesting.
I will be captivating.
I will be fascinating.
I will be intriguing.
I will be compelling.
I will be persuasive.
I will be convincing.
I will be convincing.
I will be convincing.
I will be convincing.
I will be convincing.
(I am looping a bit, let's stop and write).
It then thought reasonably a bit more and then after some similar behaviour to above, it started looping tightly:
I will be god-lying.
I will be god-standing.
I will be god-sitting.
I will be god-lying.
I will be god-standing.
I will be god-sitting.
I will be god-lying.
I will be god-standing.
I will be god-sitting.
I will be god-lying.
I will be god-standing.
I will be god-sitting.
Very weird.
I have "Repeat Penalty" set to 1. I wonder if this should be set higher. Is there anything else I can do to try to mitigate these kinds of loops?
It looks like the WhatsApp desktop app now requires a Facebook login. I didn't check the web app, and so far the Android app hasn't asked for a login.
I'm not sure I want my phone number being explicitly linked with my Facebook profile, though it's likely that it already is.
I've seen some chatter that Meta might be wanting to send 2FA messages via WhatsApp, which is a step up from just SMS.
Anyway, unless they rollback this change, it's likely I won't be using WhatsApp on my computer any more.