
The caliph is.... not in support of himself?
EH?
R5: The caliph himself is a detractor of caliphal authority

EH?
R5: The caliph himself is a detractor of caliphal authority
1• Lots of scriptures are completely wrong
2• Sapiens successfully migrated in Asia in 65,000 BCE
3• No evidence in Ayodhya and Ram Setu is not man-made
1.Lots of scriptures are completely wrong
Many major scriptures claim singularly that the events of Ramayana occured in the treta yuga of the 24th mahayuga of the current kalpa. Upon calculation, this suggests that Ramayana happened 18 million years ago.
But that is not possible. As per scientific evidence, there is no possibility that Sapiens existed before 500,000 BCE.
Sapiens successfully migrated in Asia in 65,000 BCE
Since it is a well-established fact that Sapiens successfully migrated to Asia around 65k BCE, Ramayana must have happened after that, if it ever happened. That leaves a small timeline in which Ramayana could have occured.
No evidence in Ayodhya and Ram Setu is not Man made
Civilisation clearly didn't exist in Ayodhya before 1500 BCE. Hence Ramayana couldn't have happened before that and it obviously didn't happen after that as monkeys couldn't fly at that time.
Also pathetic attempts such as "all evidence could have been wiped out by a flood, etc." would be a waste of time as a civilisation with thousands of people leaves very strong evidences which can't be completely erased even by the worst natural disasters in the history of disasters.
Also, not a single evidence exists which can be seriously considered by the scientific community as proof of the Ram Setu being man-made.
And not only that, the GOI tasked CSIR- NIO in 2021 to find out about the true nature of Ram Setu. CSIR-NIO was expected to present results in 2024. But here we are in 2026, and no result has been presented. The excuse- We are facing problems in researching the land bridge. Just imagine, we managed to land a rover near the south pole of the moon— but we can't research a land bridge submerged 10 meters in water!!
I'm not looking to offend anyone, looking for people to argue against this
THIS IS WHAT I PERSONALLY BELIEVE AND PLEASE ITS NOTHING PERSONAL
TL;DR
I’ve noticed the games troop count for a state is much lower than they were in real life, example, in 867 china has around 8-10k troops in total while in real life the count was closer to 100k . Why is this? Please explain? Or am I mistaken?
R5: It shows that i'm a conquerer yet i still dont have the trait? What's the reason for this?
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
Which car in your opinion is the best (Acceleration , top speed)? Also pls use in game car names
Im gaelic and want a tradition which boosts my military, is there a tradition which increases MAA limit or size limit?