Isn't it time for some new socialist theory, adapted to modern liberal "democracies?"
Genuine question.
Marx wrote in the 19th century. Lenin was writing against Tsarist autocracy in the 1910s-20s. Mao was writing against a feudal, war-torn China. None of them were writing for a 21st century Western liberal democracy. They were analyzing the society actually in front of them, and then adapting the theory they inherited rather than just repeating it. Lenin didn't leave Marx untouched. Mao didn't leave Lenin untouched.
So why do we act like the process stops with them?
Capitalism today isn't 19th century capitalism. The West isn't Tsarist Russia. Multinational corporations, financialization, digital platforms, mass higher education, the internet — none of that is the world Lenin or Mao were analyzing.
I'm not saying scrap Marx, Lenin, Mao, whoever. I'm saying if historical materialism means anything, theory should keep developing alongside material conditions, so why is socialist theory treated by some like the one exception to its own rule?
Shouldn't the movement be producing real new theory for the 21st century instead of just reciting texts written for societies that don't exist anymore in the form they were written about?