I messed up
So we all know that AQA A-level history paper 1 for the Tudors was a bit nasty with the essays however I've fully messed up...
I was so confident (exam adrenaline and nerves) that I knew about the Henry VII one until I walked out and realised I had completely misinterpreted patronage and in my into and thought the essay defined it as a balanced financial policy as opposed to what it really is which is rewards.
I think I'm so done for because I didn't give any examples of rewards and my argument was more about him being too harsh and the other side was times he was more reasonable, I know now that I could have fully done it with the evidence about Jasper tudor and also balanced it with the lack of rewards and argued something about it being punishment as he was not only not rewarding but also unreasonably harsh which would have been much stronger.
Overall my judgment was that with 'patronage' (reasonable financial policy) he achieved objective control however his personal dynastic insecurity meant without punishment to completely oppress any sort of threat he never personally felt in control. I used the fact he killed someone from his inner circle (William Stanley) and the extremity to which he took bonds ( seen with execution of E+D) as my killer facts...
I was also so so so anxious and stressed the entire time so that did NOT help
I'm so scared I'm going to be capped at like level 2 when the rest went well and I need an A and preferably an A*
Am I doomed? 😭