
just nimby things
when your position is so down bad you have to appeal to asbestos

when your position is so down bad you have to appeal to asbestos
If you haven't heard, Joe Tache is an independent socialist on the ballot for U.S. Senate in November, and it looks like he's putting on a concert and putting out an album! and they dropped a single & music video for it too: https://youtu.be/2ja3dSFBOQ4?si=vZrY2x2JZshWkSAW
Saw this online and wanted to share since you don't see this kinda thing(event wise or music wise) from a political campaign that often and I thought it was pretty neat to see it happening in the area especially.
I am helping my niece move in to her dorm and would like to find a place in Cambridge to hang my hammock and read for a few hours.
Any recommendations on where I can go?
Thanks 👍
What would be the positives and negatives of pushing for a line item in the Cambridge participatory budgeting for some dedicated bike lane enforcement?
Maybe it could go towards a bicycle for a particular officer to ride to more efficiently write tickets.
The open data shows 25,000 parking citations written in a month and only 60 or so for blocking bike lanes. Read that as you would like, but for all of the people giving tickets, they apparently are having a hard time seeing the cars in the bike lanes.
Why the heck are cars allowed to park in the bus lane... what kind of idiocy is that?
Hi,
we’re four guys, and we’ve put together Westminster’s restaurant scene in an app called Vota. The concept is simple: you see two places side by side (for example Famille vs. Kachina Southwestern Grill), you choose the place you’d rather go to, and the ranking updates instantly. The more people vote, the more accurate the list gets over time. There are still a few duplicates here and there, but I’m continuously cleaning up the data.
Here’s the iPhone version, with categories that actually fit Westminster’s food scene:
https://apps.apple.com/app/vota-restaurant-ratings/id6744969212
And here’s the Android version (finally live):
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.vota.app
P.S. I’m not from Westminster (I live in Gothenburg). I’m not collecting data, not selling anything, and the app does not use AI-generated content. I’m posting in a few different subreddits because we now support more regions, and I genuinely want honest feedback from people who actually know the area.
The light turns red and the car drives right through it. I wish this was rare, but it is not.
Today, I also a car not only not slow down for somebody in a crosswalk but sped up and then screech to a halt inches from the guy's legs
0:00 Introduction
0:26 To those of us who follow Cambridge politics you’re a familiar face, but can you tell us a little about your background: How did you first decide to run for office?
6:33 For such an important issue where we knew an attack was coming on our vulnerable residents, why did it take a year and a half for Beacon Hill to pass the Protect Act?
14:38 In the last election you faced an extremely tight race, winning by 42 votes. What, if anything, did you take from that experience? Did you make any changes in your approach to the office or how you communicate with your constituents?
20:36 In the past, you voted and spoke out against making committee votes public, but have now changed your mind and you voted for the new joint committee transparency rules that passed the house. Can you talk about what made you change your mind?
25:00 You’ve been asked about your employment with Berman Tabacco at the last debate, and The Harvard Crimson just published an article looking further into your work there. Why do you think this continues to be an issue, and what would you say to voters concerned about your outside responsibilities and how it impacts your job as their representative?
36:39 Thank you, Representative Decker for coming on the show. Don't forget to vote on Sept. 1st in the primary!
Video of CCTA Transparency forum featuring Rep Decker and Evan Mackay • Cambridge’s 25th Middlesex House Candidate...
#cambridgema #mapoli #Whatsthatabout
Thanks to everyone who's been reporting people parked in bike lanes in Cambridge on Bike Bureau and SeeClickFix. Ready for the next phase where we get insights from the data.
TL/DR: the city of Cambridge provides a lot of city-run programs that benefit people from lower income households. It prides itself on its socioeconomic diversity, which is rapidly declining as housing increases in price, so these lower income families can no longer afford to live here and thus don’t get to benefit from the programs that were created to support them. The new zoning laws were allegedly supposed to address some of these issues by providing more affordable housing, yet the new developers are providing housing that can only be afforded by people more financially well off. If you don’t see a problem with that, then that’s your right, but the point of the post wasn’t to argue whether that’s right or wrong.
I’m genuinely curious how other Cambridge residents feel about some of the development we're seeing under the new zoning rules, and whether there are reasonable amendments that could address some of the unintended consequences without preventing new housing from being built.
One example is 16 Field St. An existing affordable 2-family rental house (affordable likely because it’s outdated) is proposed to be replaced with a 9-unit development. According to the flyer being circulated in the neighborhood, the project would have no off-street parking, remove mature trees, leave very little green/permeable space, and contain no affordable units. Supposedly, if the building housed 10 units instead of 9, the developers would require the units to be affordable. This is one of many new developments being put up in a relatively quiet neighborhood with narrow streets and not much street parking as is.
I understand the argument for allowing greater housing density in Cambridge, especially given how expensive housing has become. But I'm wondering whether the current rules have struck the right balance.
A few questions I'd be interested in hearing people's thoughts on:
Affordability: If one of the major public-policy arguments for upzoning was improving housing affordability, should larger projects receiving substantially increased development rights be required to include at least some income-restricted affordable units? The flyer claims this particular proposal has 9 units because a 10-unit project would trigger an affordability requirement. If that's accurate, should the rules address that incentive?
Parking: Should developments of this size be required to provide some off-street parking in residential neighborhoods with narrow streets and already-limited street parking? Underground parking exists in some multifamily developments, so could requirements vary based on neighborhood conditions rather than having a blanket rule?
Trees/green space: Should increased density come with stronger requirements for preserving mature trees, maintaining permeable surface, managing stormwater, or replacing lost tree canopy?
Neighborhood context: Is there a reasonable way to accommodate substantially more housing while also considering the scale of the surrounding street and existing residential buildings?
I'm particularly interested in hearing from people who support the multifamily zoning ordinance as well as people who have concerns about it. Are these simply necessary tradeoffs of building more housing, or are there specific changes you think would make the ordinance work better?
And for anyone familiar with Cambridge government/zoning: what is actually the most effective way for residents to advocate for amendments? City Council? Planning Board? Zoning petitions? Are there already proposals addressing parking, affordability, trees, or projects that fall just below affordability thresholds?
I'm not looking to stop housing construction. I'm interested in whether we can build more housing while doing a better job on affordability, street capacity, trees/green space, and neighborhood impacts.
In addition, if you do have problems with some of these new developments, my neighbor sent me a link to sign a petition to amend the new zoning laws that I believe can be improved to actually provide affordable housing: https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/modifying-the-mfh-ordinance?source=direct_link&clear_id=true&
Tim was the greeter at our local CVS on white street in the porter sq shopping mall growing up. I remember him working there almost my whole life since we moved when I was 4, I’m 27 now! I was away for a few years, came back, and haven’t noticed him. People leave jobs for all sorts of reasons. But thank you Tim for brightening my day for many years! I hope he is ok
edit: Tim is back/ still working at cvs we think!
Honestly just kinda funny at this point.
CCC just wants Cambridge to stay the way it is. I wish they would just say that instead of making up all these absurd complaints.
If you really cared about fire safety, you would encourage as much new construction as possible as new construction is much more fire resistant.
Prior to WWII, Balloon framing was very popular, but it is no long used. One of the main reasons it is no longer used is because it is such a fire hazard. (yes, this can be fixed with blocking, but that was not required when these houses were built).
Hey all, I started a free meetup group a couple of months back called Creative Curious Camberville. It's a social group for local creative types. Crafters, book-lovers, ttrpg players, designers, writers, travelers, thrifters, artists, etc. all welcome.
You've probably heard the advice that the best way to make new friends is to pick up a hobby, but there's a lot of us who already have plenty of hobbies. Maybe they're not all the most social activities, or maybe you just don't want to carry the things you need for it, do the hobby you enjoy while others are watching, and focus on getting to know new people -- all at once. 😅
Our meetups aren't about doing specific hobbies; instead we gather like-minded folks to go together to free public festivals and arts-oriented events in the area -- walk & talk type hangouts in places where there's a lot of cool stuff to see and chat about and experience together. We've gone out to Harvard Art Museums @ Night, Cambridge Porchfest, Somerville Yart Sale, live music & BYO picnics, a vintage market street fair, and more.
I've posted an event here before, but we're about to hit 150 members 🎉 and I thought it was a good time to talk about the group as a whole and see if more Cambridge folks would like to join. Let's make friends while the sun is shining!
I'm not charging or making any money from this, just wanting to have a good outlet for us all to find cool people to hang out with and enjoy some of the awesome stuff the area has to offer, with enough curation (like-mindedness and localness) to the group that there's a better chance meetup connections can become real friendships (it's been happening for several regulars in the group; been great to hear).
Hope you'll join in, or let a friend know if this sounds like something they'd be into! Feel free to ask any questions in the comments. Cheers!
Recently moved to cambridge & just wondering what people do if they’re out of town with street parking overlapping with street sweeping!
Hadn’t seen him in a while.
I've spent my career working in technology, currently a Product Manager in Boston.
I'm 43. I still have the same fire burning in me and I'm ready to start over.
While I'm well versed in a lot of aspects of film making I have zero hours on set. How do I get started? How do I get even a meager paying job that results in dipping into savings to live.
I can afford to take courses or whatever, I just need to change every thing and be working as much as possible on movie/television sets as much as possible.
Any advice or suggestions on how to do this? Bonus if you have any ideas in Boston/Cambridge.
Appreciate it.
Hi, I have moved several times within Cambridge in the past 5 years. I just got keys to my new apartment and did a walk through with the landlord. I was very shocked to find that the apartment had not been cleaned at all between the last tenant and myself. I pointed out the amount of grease/grime on surfaces, clearly dusty walls and windows, and unwiped counters and my landlords response was “no one has ever had a problem with it before so you can pay for your own cleaner or move out.” I had no idea that it is not legally required for the landlord to clean between tenants. Now I am obviously kicking myself for not ensuring this prior to signing a lease, but I was just wondering whether this is a common experience? I have accepted that Cambridge rent is basically just crazy high at this point, but given that I will be paying this landlord over 40k in 12 months, I was shocked they were basically too cheap to pay a few hundred to have it cleaned. I purposely am paying double rent for half a month to have time to move my stuff but basically now we’re at a standstill where I can’t move anything in until I can find a last minute cleaner, and I will most likely be out an additional $300 😕
If you are moving in or moving out you should know your rights as they apply to your security deposit. So many landlords blatantly ignore the law and their failure to follow the law can result in any of the following; forfeit any right to withhold any of the deposit, force them to immediately return the deposit to you (at beginning of lease no need to wait to the end) and even award you triple damages and attorney fees.
For those moving in or renewing a lease you will be able to demand the return of your deposit thirty days after your lease is signed if landlord fails to put in escrow and supply account info (wouldn't do this if you want to renew next year : ) Also can demand return if they include clauses in lease that contradict the law.
AI generated:
Under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 186, Section 15B, landlords immediately forfeit the right to retain a security deposit if they fail to properly escrow funds, document damages with sworn statements, include illegal lease terms, or transfer deposits upon property sale. Mandatory triple damages are triggered when a landlord violates statutory obligations regarding escrow, property transfers, or fails to return the deposit within 30 days of lease termination. Read the full text of the statute at malegislature.gov.
I think sections 3,6, and 7 are most relevant.
https://www.mass.gov/info-details/mass-general-laws-c186-ss-15b
Anyone know what’s going on with 2nd st cafe in east Cambridge? They were on vacation until July 18 (sign on their door said) but they’ve been closed ever since. On Google Maps it says “temporarily closed.” Hoping they didn’t close!!