r/HOVRSTONK
How I feel reading the other eVTOL subs right now
My favorite clip from the livestream! Anthony is so funny
youtube.comHOVR missing in action 👀
Just saw a post from Mark Neeleman ranking his “Top 7” eVTOL companies… and somehow Horizon Aircraft (HOVR) didn’t make the list.
I dropped a comment on his LinkedIn to point it out, but I’m curious what this sub thinks — should HOVR be in that conversation?
Feels like a pretty big omission.
Here’s the post if anyone wants to check it out and weigh in:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/markneeleman_evtol-top-7-key-strengths-1-joby-aviation-activity-7461424272352178176-jqeP?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAAj0UgBVnAsRoExeENC-40zF8CEiRWqlv8
Curious to hear everyone’s take — are we biased here, or is HOVR getting overlooked? 🚁📈
Going live to show the microcap Presentation by Brian Merker CFO
youtube.comLink to May 27th 4:15pm registration
Hello everyone,
It’s Freddy. First post, excited to see what the future has in store for us… I see MODs are on top of things here so click on link to register for the upcoming red chip interview which will be virtual on May 27th 4:15pm
Sweet DreamZz
SIDOTI Profile on Horizon Aircraft
Source: www.sidoti.com/events/
Presentation to be done by: Brian Merker, CFO, Horizon Aircraft
Wed, May 20 at 1:00-1:30 PM in Track 2
Company Description
Horizon Aircraft (NASDAQ:HOVR) is an advanced aerospace company that is developing one of the world's first hybrid-electric VTOL (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) aircraft designed to fly most of its mission in traditional wing-borne flight, offering industry-leading speed, range, and operational utility. Horizon Aircraft's unique designs put the mission first and prioritize safety and performance. Upon successful completion of testing and certification of its full-scale aircraft, Horizon Aircraft intends to scale unit production to meet expected demand from regional aircraft operators, emergency service providers, and military customers.
Reasons to Meet
Differentiated hybrid-electric VTOL — not battery-bound. ~3–5x the range and ~2x the speed of all-electric competitors, with no charging infrastructure required.
Targets regional missions all-electrics structurally can't serve, at turboprop-competitive economics. Dual-use optionality.
The hybrid powertrain and range envelope are directly relevant to contested logistics, ISR, and MEDEVAC — opening a defense/government revenue path alongside the commercial AAM market.
Near-term catalyst at a microcap entry. 50%-scale prototype successfully flown; full-scale aircraft in build with ground/flight testing approaching. Disciplined balance sheet, active shelf, and non-dilutive funding pipeline — rare combination of imminent milestone and capital discipline in the AAM peer set.
Company Website
What do you guys think will happen if the prototype does not come at out at the end of the year?
As the title mentions, I am wondering what are your guys thoughts on the stock price if there are no working prototype by EOY as planned? I recently found this stock and seem pretty convinced of its future. I bought 950 shares yesterday at 2.30 average, but do you guys think the stock will tank hard if there is no prototype? In that case, I assume most of you guys will still hold for the future?
From an engineering standpoint, what gives HOVR the biggest advantage over Lilium?
Is the strongest argument simply that HOVR uses a hybrid system instead of a fully battery-powered model, or is there more to it?
Also, HOVR seems to have some obvious advantages like:
potentially lower battery stress/degradation
better emergency/range flexibility
less dependence on charging infrastructure
VTOL + efficient winged flight combination
Curious what people with more engineering knowledge think.
The Macro Thesis
Current live streamed video discussion regarding Canadian Infrastructure and Timeline alignments.
HOVR Family Chat
A Place for Family to Discuss the Daily Grind
Ever wondered how the PT6 engine works?
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBePV_cph0I The best turboprop engine ever made, the Legendary PT6 from Pratt & Whitney Canada (No AI)
###
If you wanted to learn more about the engine the X7 will use I recommend that video.
Also think about this. Archer, Joby, Beta... they are all building their own engines in-house. Starting from zero flight hours...
Horizon X7 on the other hand uses the best turboprop ever made with over 1 billion (yes billion) flying hours and 60 years in service.
Think about this, where would you rather put your family in? A brand new engine by a startup with limited test data. Or the the safest and most reliable engine in existence.
🙂☕ Just some food for thought and a video while you sip your coffee.
What can go wrong?
This is a honest approach zo eVTOL. No matter if HOVR, EVTL, JOBY, EVEX, ARCHER.
We need to focus in what can go wrong in terms of engineering, aeronautical performance, market targets and bottlenecks.
There is market. Crowded cities, corporate, tourism, militarized forces, emergency services, fuel independence, low pollution, community friendly noise levels.
Strong arguments for upside.
What are the challenges? Please...share your views and expected upside returns.
HOVR holder since last year... first time posting | 8k shares @ ~1.40
Price targets: my two scenarios (obviously bull)
Scenario A: Realistic 2026 bull case (full-scale built, flight testing imminent, de-risking)
This is what could actually happen by EOY 2026. Comparable companies that hit equivalent milestones (full-scale flying prototype, partnerships locked in, no cert yet) trade in the $500M–$1.5B range (Vertical Aerospace at the low end, Eve mid-range).
- Bull target: $1B market cap → with ~50M shares post-dilution → $18–$22/share
- Conservative bull: $500M market cap → $9–$11/share (matches analyst PTs)
- That's a 4–8x from $2.40
Scenario B: My dream scenario (FAA cert + full X7 by EOY 2026 — aggressive)
If this somehow happened, HOVR would re-rate against the JOBY/ACHR cohort. But even here, HOVR would trade at a significant discount because:
- Smaller team (~30 employees vs. JOBY's 2,000+)
- No vertically integrated TaaS model
- No major OEM partner like Toyota/Stellantis
- No commercial pre-orders close to ACHR's or EVTL's pre-order book
Realistic discount to JOBY's ~$10B: 15–25% → $1.5B–$2.5B market cap
- Post-cert dilution likely (~55–65M shares) → $25–$45/share
- That's a 10–18x from current
Why the hybrid + capability advantage matters (but is partially already priced)
The hybrid architecture is genuinely differentiated:
- 500 mi range vs. ~100–150 mi for pure-electric eVTOLs (JOBY ~150 mi, ACHR ~100 mi). This is the single biggest functional advantage.
- 250 mph cruise which is competitive with JOBY/ACHR
- Fan-in-wing design flies as conventional aircraft 98% of mission → certifies under existing Part 23 framework rather than the new Powered Lift category Joby/Archer had to pioneer. This is a certification tailwind, not just a performance one.
- Mission flexibility: medevac, cargo, defense, fire-fighting... it is not dependent on urban vertiport buildout, which is the biggest soft spot in the JOBY/ACHR thesis
- 75% lower operating cost vs. helicopters addresses a real $20B+ helicopter replacement TAM
But... and this is my honest counterweight:
- Hybrid means hydrocarbon emissions, which is a marketing issue with ESG buyers
- "Better technology" hasn't translated to valuation in this sector. EVTL has a 1,500-aircraft pre-order book and trades at ~$280M–$1B. Pre-orders and partnerships move stocks here, not just specs.
- HOVR has one major LOI (JetSetGo, 100 aircraft) vs. ACHR/JOBY/EVTL with airline-level commitments
- 30 employees building a certified aircraft is a small team. Cert programs typically cost $1B+. HOVR has ~$34M. Massive dilution is essentially certain before cert is achieved.
My honest take on the numbers
| Scenario | Timeline | Market cap | Share price (post-dilution) | Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 milestone bull (realistic) | EOY 2026 | $400–800M | $7–14 | 3–6x |
| Aggressive bull (your premise) | EOY 2026 | $1.5–2.5B | $25–45 | 10–18x |
| JOBY-comparable (very long term, post-FAA) | 2029–2030 | $3–5B | $40–70 | 17–29x |
The analyst PT of $11 and the high estimate of $18 from Yahoo align well with my "realistic 2026 bull" range. Anything above $20 requires either FAA cert (won't happen by EOY 2026) or a strategic acquisition premium (possible... small cap, valuable IP, would be a tuck-in for Boeing/Lockheed/Embraer).
Biggest risk to all of this: dilution. HOVR just raised $20M in May 2026 at $2.06. To fund through cert they need probably $300M+ more. At current prices that's ~150M new shares and this more than triples the share count. Bull cases need to bake this in. What do you all think about this part? I don't think institutional interest is ever a bad thing but I am not a fan of BR and the team standing on "non-dilutive" measures for cap raises.
My two cents. HOVR to the moon. This and APLD have been one of my biggest conviction plays since I have started trading. I believe this company is doing mostly everything right. With continued guidance and strategic partnerships, it is very realistic we see 10s by EOY.
Interesting acoustic thesis on HOVR from Chinese investor (high freq profile materially better for defence)
Reposting: Saw this posted on Matan's discord. His acoustic thesis is the genuinely novel, meaning I haven't seen this articulated elsewhere on HOVR. Small ducted fans run at high RPM, so the noise is high-frequency. High-frequency sound attenuates fast in air and doesn't diffract around obstacles. Helicopter rotors are large/slow, so low-frequency, which travels far and penetrates buildings. He estimates HOVR will run 10–20 dB quieter than rotorcraft, and notes the high-freq profile is materially better for any military/concealment application because the sound won't carry. This goes nicely with the Canadian defence procurement angle for stealthy insertions / extractions.
This also matches what HOVR team has been saying that it is quieter than a helicopter. Also the fans are ducted / the rear prop blocked. Even the MT prop seems to be optimized for sound level.
One more detail he is excited about is that instead of conventional visible fan blades from below the duct, there's a honeycomb/folded structure under the fan that does three things it concentrates downward thrust (hovr has this patented), acts as thrust-vector control by tilting the louvers (so attitude/translation control during hover without complex mechanical linkages), and serves as a muffler that cancels lateral acoustic energy.
Here's an image of the flowguide patent (thx Deathsmiles). If you look closely on the X5 videos you can see it in action actually.
Anyway if you were wondering the Chinese guy's trading plan is "next double, sell down to recover principal, let the rest run as venture money." Here's his video (it's in Chinese though) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRJtkxt-ugY