Evaluate my Academic Task 2
Gpt gave it 5.5-6.0 and Claude 7.0 lol, ,i'm confused.
TASK:
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
(257 word)
It’s a contemporary phenomenon that people think science should strive to improve peoples’ quality of life. While this view may seem valid at first glance, in my opinion, science, when there is the field of technology, must not be the tool to fulfill this aim.
The most common argument some suggest regarding this topic is that science must be a tool to create brand new innovations and foster technological development. However, the very core principle of science, which is to interpret the universe without any additional need or target, is neglected in this view, thus forming in one’s mind an utterly inaccurate perception of it when in fact, science must be done purely to observe, and understand the nature. So, if scientists were devoid of responsibilities to fix the major challenges of society, their work would be much more efficient towards its one and only goal.
In my opinion, it is supposed to entirely be technology’s aim to provide a better life for people, since, by definition, technology refers to improvement in methods to foster humans by making efforts to derive from science. Assigning the role of increasing quality of life to technology instead, would ultimately lead to two separate fields where no scientist having to be concerned about putting their finding into new innovational ideas, thus, again, making sure scientific knowledge expand rapidly.
In conclusion, i believe, the misconception about the role of science must be corrected and it shouldn’t be expected to contribute to humanity. Instead, technology alone must be used to improve our lives.
