Savings for the kid --> put in my NISA till they get old, then BAM, take out a portion for them. Where is the flaw in this?
As the title says.
I've got a normal savings account for my child here in Japan. I also have a NISA. It hit me the other day....why not throw the same money I'm putting in their bank account into my NISA.
Then, compounding and growth and all.
Then when they get xx years old, I take out a chunk of it (some percentage that I'll figure out) and they have it themselves. I would assume that comparing the amount of ¥¥¥ they would have after 15 years in a normal savings account vs 15 years compounding within my NISA that the NISA money would be way more.
Somehow, after what I'm learning in this forum and, more precisely, in this country...there is a flaw in this logic somewhere. I know it, I just don't know what it is.
Thoughts? Thanks!