What Are We Still Assuming?
The longer I follow this case, the more I realize there are things that get repeated so often that they start to feel like established facts.
What’s one detail or assumption about the Nancy Guthrie case that you think is worth stepping back and questioning?
It could be something about the timeline, what happened inside the house, the investigation, statements that have been repeated, or even something we may be taking for granted about the circumstances.
What makes you question it?