r/PickUpArtist

10 rules of calibration with hot girls

  1. Never be direspectful, even when they fuck up. Call them out respectfully.

  2. Never be arrogant, immediatle turn off

  3. Dont be disrespectful talking about other girls. they will get a negative vibe

  4. Never say a political side, unless it matches theirs

  5. Dont give the impression you're dating alot of women

  6. Dont say wierd, off the wall, or off things, conversation should feel normal and natural

  7. Dont say any cringe or stupid lines

  8. Dont pedestalize or give an ass kissing vibe

  9. You can make sexual jokes before actually fucking, but dont be abrupt or in your face about it. should be lighthearted

  10. Always have the mindset that you lead the convo,

Just a note, if you make a mistake not autoamtically over, you can easily recover it by backtracking and moving on.

And if once you're dating a girl geniunley you make a big mistake and she wants to cut you off, simply apologize and flirt and some persistence and you should be good

reddit.com
u/Acrobatic-State8279 — 4 days ago

My experience at the free Owen Cook Free Event for 12k Bootcamp: the most polished sales machine I've ever seen

TL;DR: Went to the free 3-day bootcamp in London. Some of the content was genuinely useful for a free event, but that isn't my issue. The whole weekend is built to lead you to one moment-- a high-pressure close on a ~12k program, with deposits taken on the spot before you've had a chance to think. I'm writing this so anyone considering it knows exactly what's coming.

  1. The bait: Owen isn't there

Most people sign up because of Owen Cook. He wasn't attending. That was only announced the day before, when everyone had already booked travel, hotels and time off. You're committed by then, so you go anyway. In hindsight that was the first sign of how carefully the whole thing is managed.

  1. Three days of building you up and breaking you down

To be fair, there were good parts and real takeaways. But the structure of the weekend is the point.

Over three days the coaches slowly build a single story: what's wrong with you is bigger than you thought, and this program is the only real way to fix it. The exercises are mostly simple things that feel hard in the moment. Once you've done them, the feeling of having broken through gets tied directly to the brand.

Many people there are at a low point, some at their wits' end, and they look at the guys on stage like gods. That gap is what drives everything that happens next.

  1. The close (this is the part you need to understand)

This is where it went from a seminar to something else. Every step felt rehearsed.

The pitch. Owen comes in on Zoom and makes the offer. He's extremely good at it. The room is already primed after three days, so it lands hard.

The hand raise. You're asked to raise your hand if you're interested. Low commitment, nothing signed. But you've now publicly identified yourself.

The separation. Everyone who raised a hand is asked to go and stand at the back of the room or outside. You're now physically removed from the people who didn't raise their hands, standing in a group of guys who all look committed.

The manufactured rush. Suddenly there's urgency: we're being kicked out by the hotel, we need to wrap this up now. I can't prove it was staged, but the timing was very convenient.

The QR codes. Staff are waiting with QR codes already set up. No time to think it over, look things up, or talk to anyone. You scan, pay a minimum £500 deposit, and a payment plan is set up for the rest.

The contract. Before you've really processed it, you've signed a roughly 10-page contract. Nobody is reading 10 pages standing in a hallway while being told the room is closing.

From start to finish it took minutes. My estimate is at least 50 people signed up for the ~12k program. Afterwards, at least half of the people I spoke to were in the same headspace as me: what just happened?

Honestly, I have to give credit for how well they've refined it. Every step is designed to remove a chance to pause: commit a little, isolate the group, apply time pressure, and remove friction from paying. It's a very well-practised sales operation.

  1. The "success stories" in the room

Some people at the event were past bootcamp attendees talking about how great it was. Watch the dynamic. These are often the guys who are being considered for the team, or at least they think they are. They're the most eager to impress the leaders, both at the event and in the group chat. Their enthusiasm is real, but it isn't neutral.

  1. Does anyone actually get results?

Probably, yes. But I'd argue that's mostly down to them. Anyone who drops thousands and turns up to a bootcamp is already desperate to change. That motivation would get results with or without having to pay 12k. This is a huge amount for the average person to pay regardless of how they frame it (burn the bridges) . I even heard at one point about using credit loans to pay.

  1. Why I'm posting

Maybe I'm biased by my own experience. Maybe I'm being harsh. But if you're going to one of these free events:

Decide your budget before you walk in, and stick to it.

Don't raise your hand "just to hear more." That's the first step of the close.

If you feel urgency, that's the moment to walk away. A real opportunity will still be there tomorrow.

Never sign a contract you haven't read. Check your cooling-off rights. In the UK/EU you may have cancellation rights depending on how and where the contract was sold.

Has anyone else been through this? Did you sign up, and did you regret it or think it was worth it? I'd really like to hear both sides.

reddit.com
u/trueskywalker3311 — 5 days ago

How RSD/natural game led many PUAs down

​

The debate between the mechanical school (Mystery Method, Ross Jeffries/NLP-based seduction) and the “natural” school (Real Social Dynamics – RSD, Tyler Durden) ultimately comes down to how the human brain processes social interactions.

Why Did Classic Methods (Mystery/NLP) Appeal to Analytical Minds?

For people with analytical, highly logical minds, human relationships can feel like a black box. Classic PUA methods from the late 1990s and early 2000s gave them something they could break down into manageable components:

- Algorithms and stages: The Mystery Method (the M3 model) provided a clear roadmap: A1, C1, and so on. Each stage had its own routines, a specific time frame, and defined actions.

- Patterns: Ross Jeffries relied on linguistic structures (NLP). Instead of having to come up with a conversation on the spot, you were given ready-made material—metaphors and stories.

- A sense of control: Having a framework reduced social anxiety. An analytical mind works best when it has a procedure for handling errors (for example, if the conversation dies down, use a story or a routine).

Why Could the RSD Approach Have Done More Harm Than Good?

In the early 2010s, RSD sparked a revolution by rejecting routines and promoting the idea that you didn't need scripts. Instead, you should simply be natural, work on your mindset, get into the right “state,” and develop a stronger presence.

For people with an intuitive grasp of social dynamics, this was liberating. However, for people with highly analytical—and especially neurodivergent—minds, this approach often became counterproductive for several reasons:

- A lack of specifics (“Just be yourself” on steroids): Slogans like “get into the right state” or “be present” are entirely abstract. For someone who needs clear, step-by-step instructions, these messages sound like magic spells.

- Feelings of guilt and failure: When the “natural” approach didn't work, the underlying message from RSD could be summed up as: “There's something wrong with your identity or your energy.” With the Mystery Method, if an opener failed, you could blame the opener—a bad routine. With RSD, the person themselves could end up feeling rejected.

- Ignoring difficulties with reading social cues: The RSD approach assumed that everyone had an innate “social compass” that could be unlocked simply by overcoming their inhibitions. However, analytical minds often need to learn body language and microexpressions consciously and intellectually, rather than simply being told to “get over their fear.”

Conclusion

RSD wanted people to play “improvised jazz.” Figures such as Tyler and Julien mocked the memorization of canned lines without considering that, for many people, those lines were the only scaffolding they had to build their social skills on in the first place.

u/nibitcoin — 6 days ago

Money, Status and external allocades won't help you...

NBA Player, Dylan Harper, played in the NBA finals last year as a rookie. He's gonna be one of the better players in the league for years to come with the chance to earn hundreds of millions of dollars in the next decade.

Money and Status..

This is for all the guys (a lot of guys) that think having money, status, social proof, power,

will automatically net you long lasting relationships with women who want to be with you or guarantee that women will stay with you.

Guys think that because it's EASY. It's easier to get your money up and follow the quantifiable model of success that society advertises rather than developing the emotional control, intelligence, self identity, standards, confidence, leadership skills, decisiveness and social skills that women actually find sexually appealing.

Money, Status,Power, “Social Proof” will not get you what you are looking for with women, folks.

u/Opening_Particular98 — 6 days ago

Social Proof does not attract women (Response)

Obviously, I made a post about how social proof does nothing to attract women and responses came.

Here's this one. Let me break it down.

First, women are socially motivated and one of the biggest reasons is attention. Women want attention.

More specifically, non sexual attention.

In an ideal world, a woman would have a man she is HIGHLY sexually attracted to and horny for that commits to her long term.

In most cases, she has to pick one though. The guy she is sexually attracted to probably won't stick around or make sense long term and the guy she usually commits to is a guy she settles for.

So a girl in a party, seeing you talk and mingle, she simply sees a guy that she can get attention from in a social setting with other people.

Not to say she can't look at you talking and be attracted but it's not because of "social proof". She's just attracted.

Attraction is natural, it can't be controlled.

That's what a lot of pickup artists mistake and think they can control attraction and do all these techniques to manipulate but it's futile.

It's also why trying to gain social proof is UNATTRACTIVE.

You're trying to get people to like you just to pass a "sniff test" so a woman will notice you and like you. Seeking validation isn't going to make her panty wet and desire you.

If the goal is just speaking to her, go ahead.

Social proof is USELESS once you have her. Now, you have to flirt with her and build sexual tension then escalate to get two alone and see if she is still down to f&*( when you're alone and no one else is there.

So that's some insight.

u/Opening_Particular98 — 13 days ago