Radiography vs. Cardiac Physiology (ECHO) - Worried about the physical demands/back pain
I am an 18-year-old trying to choose between two NHS career paths but I am torn due to physical limitations and career worries.
Option 1: Diagnostic Radiography I want to eventually pursue a career in plain-film reporting as I am okay with physiology, interested in anatomy and can handle the physics. But I afraid that the physical demand would be too much for a 5'3" male with chronic lower back and foot soreness, usually with doing something for a long time. Is the daily physical demand of moving patients, heavy mobiles, standing in lead aprons too brutal for someone like me?
Or Option 2: Healthcare science (Cardiac Physiology) I think I would be way more interested in this as I love the cardiovascular system and the heart and I keep in getting pulled back to this, and thinking of specialising in Echocardiography. However, I feel it might be too repetitive and the constant scanning will cause severe wrist/hand strain over time.
Or Option 3: Cardiac imaging I'm not really sure much about cardiac imaging, one redditor somewhere else pointed out that they wanted to do ECHO as they love the heart but chose to do interventional radiology instead and work in a cath lab, which I think would be great however I just researched it and realized that it's fast-paced which I'm not to sure about.
Has anyone transitioned between these two, or worked in a Cath Lab where both professions meet? Or just want to give any advice. I would love to hear your honest thoughts on the physical demands of both roles. Thanks!