King County Demographic Data
King County is approaching majority-minority status — but parts of the Eastside got there years ago. Here’s the city-by-city breakdown.
The Seattle Times reported last week that King County could have no single ethnic majority group as soon as next year. King 5 picked it up the same day. I went to the Census data to look at this more granularly, by city.
King County overall: White (non-Hispanic): 52.2%, down from 56.9% in 2020 Asian: 23.5% Foreign-born: 25.8% (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020–2024 ACS 5-Year Estimates)
City by city:
Seattle: White 58.8%, Asian 17.5%, Hispanic 8.5% (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020–2024 ACS)
Bellevue: White 40%, Asian 43%, Foreign-born 43% (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020–2024 ACS)
Redmond: White 44.8%, Asian 40.2%, Hispanic 6.7% (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020–2024 ACS)
Issaquah: White 55.7%, Asian 26.6% (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020–2024 ACS)
Kirkland: White 62.3%, Asian 19.3% (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020–2024 ACS)
Mercer Island: White 63%, Asian 24% (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020–2024 ACS)
A few things stand out:
Bellevue and Redmond already have no majority group. In Bellevue, Asian is the plurality at 43%. In Redmond it is nearly even — 44.8% white, 40.2% Asian. Both cities have foreign-born populations above 40%, triple the national average.
Seattle, despite being the region’s largest city, is actually less diverse than the Eastside — still 58.8% white. The Eastside diversified faster because tech immigration landed here disproportionately, not in Seattle proper.
Issaquah is the fastest-moving market I track. White share dropped nearly 3 points since 2020. Strong schools and more accessible price points compared to Bellevue are attracting similar buyer profiles slightly later in the cycle.
Mercer Island and Kirkland are earlier in the shift — high homeownership rates and higher price points mean the existing base turns over slowly.
I’m an Eastside realtor and this is the data I track for my clients.
From a real estate lens: school district strength, proximity to cultural amenities, and walkable density are showing up as hard pricing factors, not soft preferences. You can see it in where competitive offers concentrate on the Eastside.
Curious whether others are tracking the same patterns. Does the demographic shift visibly affect where buyers are landing in your experience?
This is a genuine curiosity post. I’m sharing what I see in the market and interested in what others are experiencing. Keep it civil please.