Just bought the Viture Beast.

Who makes the best prescription inserts? Should I get them directly from Viture?

Do the blue light blocking inserts make a visual difference?

Thank you!

I just got the Viture Pro 2, and no matter how I adjust it the screen is slightly bigger than the eyebox, so on my right eye the lower right corner is cropped off, and on my left eye the lower left corner is cropped off. The eyebox is oval not really a box, and those two corners fall off the oval.

Is there a workaround for this? Can I shrink the screen so it fits in the eyebox?

VertoXR Web is now available in early beta! 🥽🌐

You can now use your XR glasses directly from your browser without installing any software. This brings spatial browsing, desktop sharing, video playback, Theater Mode, 360° videos, and more directly to the web.

🌐 Try VertoXR Web:
https://app.vertoxr.com/

🎥 Full Demo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8UA6C-KCfo

✨ Highlights

• 🌐 Spatial Web Browsing — Open multiple webpages and arrange them around you in 3D space.

• 🖥️ Desktop Sharing — View your desktop screen inside Spatial View and position it wherever you want.

• 🎬 Video Playback — Watch normal and 360° videos from local storage, URLs

• 🎬 Jellyfin Client — built in jellyfin client to enjoy videos directly from your jellyfin server

• 🎭 Theater Mode — Watch your videos in a virtual theater or use a floating screen.

• 🥽 Head Tracking — Use your glasses' IMU for natural head movement and spatial interaction.

• ⌨️ Custom Keybindings — Move around your spatial environment and customize controls to your preference.

• 🔐 Browser-Based — Everything runs directly in your browser, with no software installation required.

VertoXR Web is currently in early beta, so there are still limitations and plenty of features planned for future releases.

I’d love to hear what features you’d like to see added next!

💬 Join the community on Discord

☕ Support the project

VertoXR is still a solo-developer project. If you'd like to support future development and hardware testing, you can do so here:

https://buymeacoffee.com/rohitsangwan

Thank you to everyone testing early builds, reporting bugs, and sharing feedback. Every release gets better because of this amazing community.

More features, platform support, and exciting updates are on the way. Stay tuned! 🚀

i just bought a VITURE Pro Mobile Dock and actually its pretty underwhelming.

I thought i can use it on my Windows Desktop through the Spacewalker APP for Windows.. but it can´t find the glasses when connected to the Dock. And direct connect via USB-C won´t share Grafiks without on-Board Grafik. (Connected the Dock with HDMI x HDMI, HDMI x DP and simultan USB-C x USB-C)

i thought i can use it on my Steamdeck w/o problems but Decky / XR Gaming can´t find the glasses when connected to the Dock.

Even on my Iphone with the Spacewalker App the Dock is Useless and won´t enable the extra features.

And for Switch 2, any 8€ adapter will do the same just w/o the Powerbank feature. if you want to use it on multiscreens use a splitter... WOW what a highlight.

Gona return that crap

I am about to purchase either The Beast or Pro 2. Help me decide which.

I really like the screen size of the beast - but I’m worried the blurry edges will bother me. I have not tried either one. I’m just gonna go for one without trying either- I know this is not smart but that’s why I’m asking for help!

Help me pick! I would be using them for entertainment purposes. Basically YouTube. Netflix. Phone mirror. Some second screen on my laptop.

Anyone that’s used both - please chime in if you don’t mind.

Thoughts?

Hi! Which is the best way to get the best of the beast and ps5/ps5 pro? With mobile dock pro and hdmi?

Bueno, hoy recientemente he recibido mis gafas.

El unboxing ha sido perfecto, se nota el detalle y la buena calidad de los materiales que han usado tanto en la caja como en sus accesorios y las propias gafas.

Pero en mi caso referente al ver contenido en 3d ha sido únicamente posible en Youtube desde la app spacewalker y la experiencia no ha sido tan buena, muchos artefactos y la imagen con bastantes parpadeos y caídas de frames.

He intentado usar vlc para reproducir una película y activar el modo inmersivo 3d y no aparecea opción en azul. Si fuerzo usar el modo 3D la imagen que genera son en casa ojo una parte de la imagen y para nada en 3d.

No se de qué manera puedo hacer para ver mis películas en modo inmersivo usando mi Samsung z fold 7.

Las compré porque me atraía mucho el poder ver contenido en 3D y creo que las voy a devolver a amazon. No me gusta depender de un pc para poder disfrutar de las gradas.

Aunque tengo que decir que la imagen es muy nítida y brillante, es como ver una TV oled y sin distorsión en ningún ángulo ni esquinas

¿Como hacen ustedes para alejar o acercar la pantalla para que se vea más grande?

Yo tengo la sensación de que no está a 145" sino más bien a 90-100"...

I’ve spent some time comparing the VITURE Luma Pro and VITURE Pro 2, mainly for gaming, and there are some differences that are quite noticeable.

Build quality

Both glasses are very well built. However, the Pro 2 feels slightly better built to me. It feels a little more solid and refined overall.

Image quality

This is where the Pro 2 wins.

The colors are still vibrant, but they feel more natural and controlled. The Luma Pro can sometimes have those very intense, almost fluorescent reds, whereas the Pro 2 looks more balanced while still being very vivid and contrasty.

Fine detail is also better on the Pro 2. The difference isn’t huge, but text is easier to read and small details in games, especially things in the distance, are easier to distinguish.

No black crush on both, and blooming is quite under control on both, maybe Pro 2 has slightly more blooming, but so subtle that is nothing to worry about.

Brightness

The Pro 2 also seems slightly brighter at maximum brightness.

However, both glasses get extremely bright, to the point where I don’t think brightness should be a deciding factor. The difference is there, but in actual use, both reach more than enough brightness.

FOV / perceived screen size

This is where I actually prefer the Luma Pro.

The Luma Pro feels like a larger screen overall. The advertised ~146” feels believable from my perspective. It has more of that big home-theater-screen feeling.

The Pro 2 feels closer to a ~125-130” screen. Maybe slightly closer to my eyes. It’s still very immersive. The 50º fov are real, it’s just my perception.

Interestingly, increasing the IPD on the Pro 2 makes the perceived screen feel somewhat larger, closer to the Luma Pro. However, I think this proves that is more of a perception effect rather than an actual noticeable FOV difference.

For immersion, I’d give the advantage to the Luma Pro, slightly.

Audio

Very similar overall.

Volume seems basically identical to me. The Luma Pro may have slightly more pronounced mids and highs, while the Pro 2 sounds a little flatter. Some people might prefer the Luma Pro as it might sound cleaner or clearer.

I wouldn’t consider audio a deciding factor between them tho.

Comfort

The Pro 2 wins here.

I’ve never had any comfort issues with the Luma Pro. They’re already very comfortable for me.

However, the Pro 2 feels slightly better, mainly because it’s lighter. The adjustable nose pads/bridge also make it easier to get a comfortable fit.

Edge clarity

Surprisingly, I see very little difference here.

I’m using the Pro 2 with the default nose pads and haven’t experimented much with adjusting them. Around 80% of the image looks perfectly sharp to me, while the remaining area is slightly softer.

However, if I move the glasses slightly closer to my eyes, I can get essentially the entire screen looking sharp.

So for me, edge clarity is basically a tie.

Heat

Neither gets particularly hot in my experience.

The Pro 2 doesn’t seem to heat up noticeably, but the Luma Pro wasn’t particularly warm either.

Lens darkness

This surprised me.

Even though the Pro 2 doesn’t have the electrochromic lenses, the lenses are very dark. I’d estimate they provide roughly 70–80% of the perceived darkness of the Luma Pro’s electrochromic lenses.

For me, this isn’t nearly as important a difference as I expected.

Latency — slight issue for me

This is the main reason I’m slightly hesitant about choosing the Pro 2.

Testing both with a PS5, the Luma Pro feels very slightly more responsive to me. Input feels instantaneous.

With the Pro 2, I perceive a small amount of additional latency, not much tho, as I’m really used to +240hz monitors so I notice small things like this.

Gaming comparison

For reference, the Luma Pro feels to me roughly like playing on my LG OLED C4 at 120 Hz with Game Mode enabled and the corresponding low-latency boost mode.

The difference in perceived latency between the two feels roughly like comparing input lag at 90–100 Hz versus 144 Hz on a monitor.

Keep in mind I only tried Grand Theft Auto V and Red Dead Redemption 2, capped at 30 FPS on my PS5, but that’s what I felt.

I don’t think this would bother most people tho, but latency is quite important to me and I’m really sensitive to it.

Overall

Honestly, I can’t decide which one is the better product.

The Pro 2 has several advantages:

• Better overall image quality
• Better fine detail
• Slightly higher brightness
• More comfortable
• Excellent, more natural-looking colors
• Slightly more solid build
• Lower price

On the other hand, the Luma Pro has some advantages that can be equally important depending on what you value:

• A more vivid and spectacular-looking image, which some people may actually prefer
• More immersive perceived screen size
• Electrochromic dimming
• Magnetic connector
• Possibly slightly lower latency, at least in my experience

So I genuinely think either one is a great option.

The Pro 2 feels like the more refined and balanced product, while the Luma Pro has a few characteristics that make it more appealing for immersion.

For me personally, I’m still undecided between the two.

I have a decent pair of wired headphones that I enjoy using while watching shows. I don't mind using the glasses on their own, but the sound quality of the speakers on the glasses just doesn't compare to using headphones/earbuds. What splitter/dock is good to allow me to use the glasses and wired headphones at the same time? Not looking to spend a crazy amount but any suggestions are appreciated.

Phone is a OnePlus15 if that makes any difference

Has anyone tried the pro 2s with a steam deck yet? Are u able to lock the screen in place while connect?

Basically I can watch an entire movie converted in real time from 2D to 3D, whereas it struggles and stutters on the iPhone. Is that the case for you too?

I really selfishly wish these were $100, they look so cool, but for something im not sure i'd regret purchasing (ar/xr glasses in general I don't own a pair) I don't feel comfortable spending $300-$600. I remember my dad buying a telescope in the late 90's maybe early 2000's, and the salesman told us if he had bought a telescope with similar technology 3 years prior it would have cost $50,000 and not $500. Im just afraid I buy a pair of beasts or luma ultras and am either disappointed, or end up being extremely outdated possibly within a few years. I just want to know from people who aren't rich and can't afford too many purchases outside their budget if the glasses are really worth it. From everything I've seen they look extremely cool, especially 3dof/6dof, and is one of the most futuristic pieces of technology I've ever seen.

My priorities:

• Maximum image sharpness
• 120 Hz (mandatory)
• The ability to use prescription lens inserts (I have astigmatism)
• Good edge-to-edge clarity
• As few optical compromises as possible

My use case:

• Gaming in bed via Tab S7+, using GeForce Now and Moonlight Streaming
• Movies
• Gaming while doing cardio on a recumbent bike
• Occasionally browsing Reddit or watching YouTube

Things I don't care about:

• Peak brightness / nits (I'll use them indoors 98% of the time)
• Productivity or virtual multi-monitor setups

One thing that worries me is text clarity and edge sharpness.

I've read several comments saying that the VITURE Beast has a larger FOV but also noticeably blurrier edges and less sharp text near the borders.

On top of that there are just so many different models I have no clue what to look at. Older but good models are also ok I guess. I would buy used.

Thanks a lot.

Acquisto Viture pro 2

Salve ragazzi, vorrei un consiglio per l' acquisto del Viture pro 2. Da Amazon in Italia il prezzo è di 349€ mentre dal sito del produttore con uno sconto arrivo a 263€ spedito (ovviamente senza spese doganali) che è un bel risparmio ma c'è il rischio di dover pagare le spese doganali, in caso di articolo difettoso dovrei rispedirlo a mie spese ed inoltre mi pare che la garanzia sia di solo 1 anno oltre a tempi di spedizione più lunghi....di contro però a differenza di Amazon che ha già i dispositivi presso i magazzini europei quelli che arrivano da Viture sono di sicuro l'ultima release hardware come lotto di produzione....Vale la pena secondo voi tentare dal sito del produttore? Non ho mai acquistato da loro e non ho informazioni sulla loro serietà e affidabilità su post vendita....con Rayneo non mi sono trovato troppo bene perché è vero che li avevo presi da venditori terzi (Aliexpress e Amazon)ma hanno demandato sempre verso di loro qualunque assistenza e non anno voluto nemmeno darmi informazioni utili a capire se il problema fosse della mia unità o un limite dell' articolo.

Scusate il post un po' lungo...

Have any real-life folks tried the Pro 2 yet? There are lots of video reviews, but of course, many of those are sponsored and/or earning commission.

I am mostly wondering about clarity. My primary usage will be Switch 2 and movies.

I have tried the Beast and XReal One Pro, but I'd love as much clarity as possible. I'd love something close to 4K — not just in part of the screen but all around.