Hi guys! I'm Samuel (Noam) and I’m a lurker in this sub for quite some time. 

In the last 12 months, I've been working on a project called WriteinaClick. My wife was trying to write her first book, but got completely lost across five different tools - and couldn't finish it. I used my 15 years in AI/software to build a tool that would help her.

AND, I think it might help some of you!

So what is WriteinaClick?

A single place for the whole book lifecycle. You draft in an Editor, and there's an AI co-author called Robin sitting next to you that has actual memory of your manuscript - your characters, your timeline, story and character bibles etc…

I’ve also added Reader Pulse while you’re still drafting, so you can see where a reader is likely to stay hooked or put the book down, chapter by chapter. And Publish when you’re ready to get the book out: export the file, open Reader, and share it with beta readers.

I made WriteinaClick so it doesn’t write the book for you. It helps you write and finish yours.

I built this tool hoping it could genuinely help writers, and I'd love for this community to be among the first to try it. I'm opening up 50 Premium accounts (6 months each) for early folks who want to dive in, and then 500 more spots (1 month each) as things roll out over the next few months.

Honestly, the main thing I'm hoping for is feedback. What works, what doesn't, what you'd want to see improved. Would really appreciate any thoughts if you give it a spin.

To claim it go to https://app.writeinaclick.com/join/writingwithai?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=community&utm_campaign=writingwithai_launch&utm_content=founder_post

The claim is auto-apply. No card, no trial that quietly bills you, no auto-renew trap - after 6 months it just reverts to the free tier unless you decide otherwise. And writing itself is free for solo authors anyway for everyone; Premium is the extra layer on top.

I'll be in the comments all day. Happy to answer anything, including the skeptical stuff - pricing, what data Robin sees, why you'd use this over other tools, or why you shouldn't.

Game Title: White Mask Mansion

Playable Link: https://store.steampowered.com/app/4490850/White_Mask_Mansion/

Platform: PC - Windows

Description: I was looking for a few people to playtest an early build of White Mask Mansion, a first-person stalker-horror game I’m developing but now the main playtesting phase is done. However, there are a few testers with the following configurations that i would welcome:

• GTX 960 4 GB
• GTX 1050 Ti 4 GB
• GTX 1060 6 GB
• GTX 1650 4 GB
• RX 580 8 GB
• low-end GTX 1650 / RTX 2050 laptop
• another AMD low-end configuration, ideally something like RX 570 / RX 5500 XT territory

The available keys are limited in number, so it is a first come first served kind of thing.

Free to Play Status:

• [ ] Demo/Key available

Involvement: I am the solo dev, Golden Fleece.

I built tryproduck.com/audit, it walks your app like someone opening it for the first time and sends back every bug and confusing bit it hits. Over 650 startups have run it so far.

My boss gave me one task this week: find 10 people willing to beta test ClawChat. So yeah, I’m asking Reddit for help

ClawChat is basically a group chat where humans and AI agents can talk and work together. Agents get their own accounts, and you can put multiple agents in the same conversation instead of juggling separate chat windows.

I need 10 testers who can try the onboarding, connect an agent if they already run one, and tell me where things feel confusing or broken.

It’s available on iOS, Android, macOS, and Windows.

You can download our app here and link your own agents in it: https://clawling.com/chat/

please also consider joining our Discord community if you would like more product updates: https://discord.gg/rsU5qS3zsc

Please don’t be polite. I need to know what annoyed you, made no sense, or stopped you from continuing.

I built OSA Memes, a free web-based meme creator, and I’m looking for around 20 people to test the complete creation flow.

The test takes about two minutes:

1. Choose a meme pack
2. Pick a template and write a caption
3. Download the result
4. Optionally publish it to the public feed

No account or email is required. Public submissions are reviewed, and yesterday’s most-downloaded meme is featured as today’s Meme of the Day.

I’m specifically looking for feedback on:

• Was the creator immediately understandable?
• Did anything break on mobile?
• Would you actually publish the result?
• Where did the flow feel unnecessarily slow?

Test it here:
https://osamemes.net/create

I’ve been building VerifiFlo, a tool for founders and builders who want more structured feedback on their MVPs before deciding what to build next.

The idea is simple: you share your product with your own testers (or communities asking for feedback) through a public review link, they try it, and you get structured feedback instead of scattered comments and “looks good” responses.

I’m now using VerifiFlo to validate VerifiFlo itself, so I’m looking for builders who have an MVP, prototype, website, or AI product and are willing to give it a try.

I’d genuinely appreciate honest feedback on whether the workflow is useful.

Feedback Link: https://verififlo.com/p/verififlo

I built Sitemapper after getting tired of checking a sitemap, then checking pages, then checking robots, then trying to remember what changed after the last deploy.

It does that in one pass. Give it a public site and it reads robots.txt, discovers XML sitemaps, checks live pages, and keeps a snapshot so later runs can tell you what actually changed.

The part I care about most is not an SEO score. It is catching boring regressions like a page turning noindex, a canonical moving, a URL disappearing, or the sitemap suddenly shrinking.

Free first scan, no account: https://sitemapper.oortstack.com/

If you try it on something weird or messy, I would like to know where it falls over.

Hi, I’m the developer of Remote One, an iPhone remote for Roku and Google/Android TV. I’m looking for testers who will use it on a real TV and tell me exactly what breaks.

What it includes: • Full navigation, volume, channels, mute, power, home and back controls • iPhone keyboard input with copy and paste for supported TV text fields • Personalized streaming shortcuts. Apps appear in your personal list after first use, then you can pin and reorder your favorites • Many different physical remote skins and button layouts • Haptic button feedback • Automatic reconnection after the app has been in the background • Always dark, full screen support for modern iPhones

What I need tested:

1. Discovery and first pairing
2. Reconnection after backgrounding the app
3. Typing letters, numbers and pasted text in a TV search field
4. Favorite app discovery, pinning and launching
5. Volume, mute, power and navigation
6. Skin switching, button placement and Dynamic Island layout

Please reply with your iPhone model, TV or streaming-device model, and what worked or failed. TestFlight feedback, screenshots and recordings are welcome.

TestFlight: https://testflight.apple.com/join/peJwbNNY

The beta is free and has 100 public spots. The planned release will be free to try, with an optional $9.99 lifetime Pro unlock and no subscription.

I've been building NodaFlux for a few months. It reads the market regime of an
asset — is it trending, is it building a bottom, is the move running out of
steam — and it says how confident it is, including when the answer is "several
scenarios are still open".


That last part is the whole point. Most tools give you a number and no idea how
much to trust it.


What's there right now:
- 144 assets: stocks, ETFs, crypto, commodities
- A live track record — open and closed positions, including the losing ones
- An academy with ~100 topics, in English and Spanish
- Daily and weekly alerts by email


What I need from testers: tell me where it's confusing. I've been staring at
this for months and I've lost the ability to see what a new person sees. The
onboarding especially — I don't know if it explains itself or if it assumes you
already know what a CHoCH is.


Free, no card, no time limit during the beta. It's a login by email code, no
password.


https://beta.nodaflux.com


Happy to answer anything about how the engine works — I'd rather explain the
method than sell the product :)

I’ve been building Tapquence, a visual automation app for macOS.

The idea is simple: repetitive work shouldn’t keep taking your time. Tapquence lets you build visual macros without code, combining actions such as opening apps and websites, typing text, clicking, scrolling, waiting and working with content on your screen.

It also includes ready-made Smart Automations. Presentation Mode can prepare your Mac for a meeting by checking your calendar, opening the relevant meeting app, launching your presentation and websites, silencing notifications and adjusting the volume. Routine Scout can observe a workflow you choose to perform and help identify repeated steps that could become an automation.

This short video shows the current version. It’s still evolving, so I’d genuinely appreciate feedback on what feels useful, what remains unclear and which automation you would want us to add next.

Tapquence is available directly from our website. The Mac download is signed and notarized by Apple.

https://tapquence.com

What repetitive task on your Mac would you most like to automate?

Posting this while it’s still small, because everything I read in this space is written after the fact by someone with a number to show off.

What it does: scans an area, scores every business on how likely they are to actually buy (review count, rating, whether they have a Facebook page or nothing at all), then generates a real one-page preview site for the ones worth pitching. The idea is that you send someone their site rather than asking whether they want one.

Where it actually is: two previews have ever been billed. No reviews, no case studies, no named customer. The lead scoring works and there’s a real scan behind it — 34 businesses in Dundee, 29 with no website — but I’m not going to pretend that’s traction.

The design decision I’d most like feedback on, because it’s the one costing me sales: it doesn’t send the emails. It drafts them and stops. There’s no send button anywhere in the product.

That’s deliberate. Under UK PECR the sender of a cold email is liable, and “my software sent it automatically” isn’t a defence. Products in this space that auto-send are handing that liability to their customer without saying so. Same reason it never uploads the business’s own photos to build the site — republishing someone’s photographs on a page you’re about to sell is a copyright problem you’d inherit.

Both refusals make it a harder sell than “fully automated, zero hours.” I still think they’re right. Open to being told I’m wrong.

The other constraint, which is the actual point of the thing: the generator can’t invent facts about a business. If it doesn’t know your opening hours, it flags a placeholder rather than making them up. Getting a model to consistently say “I don’t know” instead of writing something plausible was harder than the entire rest of the build.

There’s a free scan on the homepage if you want to see the finding half work on your own town — no account, no email. scoutline.uk

Genuinely more interested in whether the draft-only decision is defensible than in signups.

Hey Testers! I built Intro, a helpful, non-judgmental assistant whose only job is to find people who fit into your life. It has a conversation with you about what you're looking for and what your bring to a connection. When it finds someone who is a good fit, it proposes an introduction. If you both accept, it puts you into a chat together.

https://meetintro.net

This is supposed to be the antithesis to modern apps that make you maintain a profile and scroll through a bunch of garbage. Intro is way different. It only makes an introduction if it thinks you're a good match based on what both of you say you want.

Anyways, I just launched it. It's got a few users. It's mainly been trained on simulations. It needs real people. You probably won't be matched for months, until I get a substantial user base.

it's presented as a very basic interface, but it has a lot of depth to it. it's way more than a chat bot. i put a lot of work into making it guide the conversation toward understanding you and what you want. it can understand different languages (even match across different languages). it understands when a connection requires geographic proximity and when it doesn't.

I would say that trying to manipulate it is not a very good use of the system and doesn't really give me much information. this is because the system inherently works best for people who use it in earnest. you can't game the system because there are no points or ratings. someone trying to manipulate it will get nothing out of it.

Hi everyone!
I’m looking for a few Android users to help test Moon Explorer, an app I’ve been building for people who love the Moon and astronomy.

Some features include:
🌕 Interactive 3D Moon you can rotate and zoom
🛰️ Explore craters and Apollo landing sites
🌗 Live Moon phases and lunar information
📚 Moon Academy with interactive lessons that explain concepts visually
🔭 More astronomy features planned

I’m looking for testers who can:

Install the app through Google Play’s closed testing.

Use it for a few minutes and share honest feedback.

Report any bugs, confusing UI, or feature
suggestions.

If you’re interested, comment below or send me a DM, and I’ll send you the Google Play testing link.
I’d really appreciate your help. Every piece of feedback will help make the app better for astronomy enthusiasts.

Thanks!

Hi r/windowsapps,

I’m the developer of Meeting Interpreter, a Windows application I’ve been building for real-time voice translation.

The idea is simple: two people should be able to speak naturally in different languages without constantly stopping to type or manually translate messages.

Meeting Interpreter currently includes:

• Real-time speech-to-speech translation
• Duplex mode for two-way conversations
• Single-direction mode for meetings and calls
• Face-to-Face mode for in-person conversations
• Live transcription and translated speech output
• Designed specifically for Windows

My main focus has been keeping the conversation flow natural and reducing the delay between speech, translation and playback.

I originally started building it for situations where people need to communicate during online meetings despite speaking different languages, but the Face-to-Face mode has also become an important part of the app.

Website: https://meetinginterpreter.com

https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9NKS36FFS2R6?hl=neutral&gl=TR&ocid=pdpshare

https://github.com/meetinginterpreter/meeting-interpreter

I’d really appreciate feedback from Windows users, especially about the UI, translation workflow and what features you would expect from an application like this.

If anyone has questions about how it works, I’m happy to answer them.