



Hi everyone. Wanted some feedback. Basic question: when does playing chess become fun? Am I ever going to love just playing? Is it always going to just be a source of stress? With lingering anxiety after a session?
Some background. I have been playing on and off for years. Highest rapid ranking on chess.com was 1100. It was a grind, and I realized that after getting to 1000 I was really no happier than when I was 700. I will never be great. I realize that. But will it ever be like ‘I have arrived’ or ‘ok, I am content.’? I am coming to the hard conclusion that perhaps there is no end in sight and i don’t know how to make peace with that. Is 1200, or 1300 going to make it all great? The grind is not necessarily worth just hanging on to a 1000 rating. I don’t know. Problem is, I am an obsessive person and have a part of me that is drawn to the highs and lows of play. But it’s not all that fun.
Would like some input from others and see if this is a common feeling and maybe some things that helped or whatever.
Thanks!
Any specific methods or studies that helped you immensely in your improvement? I feel like it's so much harder from here.
1st is classical
2nd is rapid
3rd is blitz
Full article link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQyNolyIcUHBJaChN5-uMKZGxx2R1DmrsXGq6XR0Ci2nklabNQI1UqADoGvL9Eq0ihKS230NgiGoKz9/pub
My theory:
I think, but don’t know for sure, that the surge in new players around COVID, also accompanied by their change to allow players to self-select their starting rating, either 400, 800, 1200, or 1600 must have led to many players that are much stronger than a 400 is “supposed” to be entering the pool at 400. This pushes down the bottom of the player pool significantly to the very bottom, 100.
Once players of varying beginner-level strength start being pushed down to 100, that means that “100” will cover a varied skill set. Which means that 150’s, being paired with 100’s will also see distortion in their ratings as a result. Then 200’s being paired with 150’s, and so on. Slowly over time the problem compounds and moves up the rating ladder as we see in the Glicko outcome error charts.
Tal Memorial 2011 was held in Moscow, Russia, at Pashkov House from November 16 to 25. The tournament had an average rating of 2776, making it a Category 22 tournament and, at the time, the highest-rated 10-player round-robin tournament in chess history. The tournament featured an incredible lineup of 10 players:
Carlsen and Aronian finished tied for first with 5½/9, with Carlsen taking first place on tiebreak.
Also, the closing ceremony of the event https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jt_5_-Gk3g0
| Rank | Player | Age | Approx. career winnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magnus Carlsen | 35 | $12,246,172 |
| 2 | Viswanathan Anand | 56 | $10,302,229 |
| 3 | Garry Kasparov | 63 | $8,735,599 |
| 4 | Anatoly Karpov | 75 | $6,756,427 |
| 5 | Vladimir Kramnik | 51 | $6,512,030 |
| 6 | Fabiano Caruana | 34 | $5,179,991 |
| 7 | Ian Nepomniachtchi | 36 | $4,521,320 |
| 8 | Levon Aronian | 43 | $4,136,545 |
| 9 | Hikaru Nakamura | 38 | $3,974,396 |
| 10 | Bobby Fischer | 64 at death | $3,519,650 |
| 11 | Veselin Topalov | 51 | $3,361,454 |
| 12 | Wesley So | 32 | $3,237,790 |
| 13 | Ding Liren | 33 | $3,172,858 |
| 14 | Maxime Vachier-Lagrave | 35 | $2,876,256 |
| 15 | Boris Gelfand | 58 | $2,469,933 |
| 16 | Alireza Firouzja | 23 | $2,345,248 |
| 17 | Alexander Grischuk | 42 | $2,327,309 |
| 18 | Sergey Karjakin | 36 | $2,065,966 |
| 19 | Gukesh D | 20 | $1,961,802 |
| 20 | Boris Spassky | 88 at death | $1,849,564 |
| 21 | Anish Giri | 32 | $1,767,564 |
| 22 | Peter Svidler | 50 | $1,725,979 |
| 23 | Nigel Short | 61 | $1,694,636 |
| 24 | Shakhriyar Mamedyarov | 41 | $1,467,570 |
| 25 | Gata Kamsky | 52 | $1,419,204 |
| 26 | Michael Adams | 54 | $1,405,658 |
| 27 | Peter Leko | 46 | $1,161,443 |
| 28 | Vasyl Ivanchuk | 57 | $1,152,170 |
| 29 | Jan-Krzysztof Duda | 28 | $1,138,553 |
| 30 | R Praggnanandhaa | 21 | $1,129,778 |
| 31 | Vincent Keymer | 21 | $1,044,968 |
| 32 | Leinier Dominguez Perez | 42 | $1,042,781 |
| 33 | Arjun Erigaisi | 22 | $1,002,529 |
| 34 | Alexei Shirov | 54 | $940,383 |
| 35 | Ruslan Ponomariov | 42 | $858,887 |
| 36 | Nodirbek Abdusattorov | 21 | $834,739 |
| 37 | Javokhir Sindarov | 20 | $778,684 |
| 38 | Jan Timman | 74 | $726,397 |
| 39 | Alexander Khalifman | 60 | $691,066 |
| 40 | Daniil Dubov | 30 | $676,899 |
| 41 | Hans Moke Niemann | 23 | $669,426 |
| 42 | Teimour Radjabov | 39 | $668,878 |
| 43 | Dmitry Andreikin | 36 | $622,960 |
| 44 | Nihal Sarin | 22 | $619,175 |
| 45 | Andrey Esipenko | 24 | $600,072 |
| 46 | Vladislav Artemiev | 28 | $596,346 |
| 47 | Alexander Morozevich | 49 | $577,718 |
| 48 | Richard Rapport | 30 | $561,709 |
| 49 | Wei Yi | 27 | $555,902 |
| 50 | Vladimir Fedoseev | 31 | $529,831 |
Would this be a practical loophole in a 90+30 chess tournament?
Hypothetically:
So the move flow is:
2200 White → Friend → 2200 Black → Me → 2200 White → ...
The two 2200s are effectively playing the same game against each other without realizing it. My friend and I are just reproducing their moves.
The potential usefulness is that instead of me having to find moves against a 2200-rated player, I would effectively be using the moves chosen by another 2200-rated player in the exact same position. My friend gets the equivalent benefit from the other 2200.
Assuming both boards remain perfectly synchronized, would this actually be practical in a 90+30 game? Would the time control make it feasible to keep the positions synchronized throughout the game?
Obviously this would be cheating in an actual tournament; I'm asking about whether the mechanism itself would work.
(used chatgpt to frame it)
| Rank | Player | Age | Approx. career winnings |
|---|
| 1 | Ju Wenjun | 35 | $1,856,172 |
|---|
| 2 | Tan Zhongyi | 35 | $1,064,841 |
|---|
| 3 | Alexandra Kosteniuk | 42 | $1,016,237 |
|---|
| 4 | Koneru Humpy | 39 | $928,461 |
|---|
| 5 | Hou Yifan | 32 | $921,781 |
|---|
| 6 | Aleksandra Goryachkina | 27 | $883,779 |
|---|
| 7 | Kateryna Lagno | 36 | $813,450 |
|---|
| 8 | Anna Muzychuk | 36 | ≈$787,228 |
|---|
| 9 | Lei Tingjie | 29 | $652,037 |
|---|
| 10 | Valentina Gunina | 37 | $604,746 |
|---|
| 11 | Bibisara Assaubayeva | 22 | $568,158 |
|---|
| 12 | Harika Dronavalli | 35 | $506,792 |
|---|
| 13 | Nana Dzagnidze | 39 | $481,627 |
|---|
| 14 | Mariya Muzychuk | 33 | $435,276 |
|---|
| 15 | Irina Krush | 42 | $410,553 |
|---|
| 16 | Alice Lee | 16 | $409,949 |
|---|
| 17 | Zhu Jiner | 23 | $398,889 |
|---|
| 18 | Carissa Yip | 22 | $395,626 |
|---|
| 19 | Judit Polgár | 50 | $375,352 |
|---|
| 20 | Xie Jun | 55 | $355,400 |
|---|
| 21 | Vaishali Rameshbabu | 25 | $329,669 |
|---|
| 22 | Antoaneta Stefanova | 47 | $325,115 |
|---|
| 23 | Anna Ushenina | 40 | $301,950 |
|---|
| 24 | Polina Shuvalova | 25 | $220,562 |
|---|
| 25 | Elisabeth Pähtz | 41 | $212,296 |
|---|
| 26 | Anna Zatonskih | 48 | $198,071 |
|---|
| 27 | Divya Deshmukh | 20 | ≈$197,262 |
|---|
| 28 | Alisa Galliamova | 54 | $191,614 |
|---|
| 29 | Natalija Pogonina | 41 | $187,345 |
|---|
| 30 | Alina Kashlinskaya | 32 | $186,033 |
|---|
| 31 | Pia Cramling | 63 | $166,077 |
|---|
| 32 | Tatev Abrahamyan | 38 | $161,648 |
|---|
| 33 | Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova | 27 | $158,481 |
|---|
| 34 | Olga Girya | 35 | $158,144 |
|---|
| 35 | Xu Yuhua | 49 | $157,500 |
|---|
| 36 | Bella Khotenashvili | 38 | $152,649 |
|---|
| 37 | Sarasadat Khademalsharieh | 29 | $148,635 |
|---|
| 38 | Jennifer Yu | 24 | $147,777 |
|---|
| 39 | Nino Batsiashvili | 39 | $146,899 |
|---|
| 40 | Tatiana Kosintseva | 40 | $145,075 |
|---|
| 41 | Zhu Chen | 50 | $144,099 |
|---|
| 42 | Zhansaya Abdumalik | 26 | $139,015 |
|---|
| 43 | Zhao Xue | 41 | $137,011 |
|---|
| 44 | Susan Polgar | 57 | $125,400 |
|---|
| 45 | Stavroula Tsolakidou | 26 | ≈$123,897 |
|---|
| 46 | Ekaterina Kovalevskaya | 52 | $115,619 |
|---|
| 47 | Nazi Paikidze | 32 | $113,495 |
|---|
| 48 | Elina Danielian | 48 | $105,752 |
|---|
| 49 | Natalia Zhukova | 47 | $105,007 |
|---|
| 50 | Nurgyul Salimova | 23 | $102,655 |
|---|
I heard we can't calculate the total number of chess games. To me it seems like a computable problem. Is it just the sheer large number of all the possible chess games, or is it something else that I,m not understanding?
Net: +4
Raw: +4=9-0
Place: 2nd of 14
TPR: 2833
Net: +6
Raw: +6=8-0
Place: 1st of 8
TPR: 2908
Net: +1
Raw: +2=6-1
Place: Tied 3rd-4th of 10
TPR: 2783
Net: +1
Raw: +2=6-1
Place: Tied 3rd-4th of 10
TPR: 2788
Average TPR over all 45 games: 2837
His only remaining Classical tournament prior to the World Championship is the Olympiad (to my knowledge). We'll see if he can keep up his performance there too.
After the Sinquefield Cup, World Chess Champion Gukesh is now the lowest rated 2700+ player.
Olympiad is coming which is usually one of his strongest events, let’s hope the Champ can bounce back for his world title defence!
Curious to hear people’s thoughts
Crazy constintency, losing and winning to the same players in the same rounds, he basically had two indentical tournaments
The top American chess players are all in their 30s (Hikaru Nakamura, Fabiano Caruana, Wesley So, Sam Shankland) with Leinier Domínguez Pérez and Levon Aronian in their early 40s.
After that, there doesn't seem to be much of an American presence in the international chess scene except for folks like Hans Niemann.
When the old heads fade and lose their edge, where is the next generation of American players to take up the mantle? Why aren't the likes of Awonder, Sam Sevian, Ray Robson, Abhimanyu Mishra, etc. making much waves in the international scene while the young Indian / Uzbek chess players are all over the place?