
r/dcu

I would love to see a Hulk Vs. Superman movie since we haven't had seen this 2 go toe to toe with one another in live action before. I think the film should take inspirations from The Incredible Hulk Vs. Superman ( 1999 comic ) for double lives and Hulk Vs. ( 2009 ) for the fight.
What are your hopes for the Creature Commandos going forwards in the DCU?
Here are some of mine.
1.) They have the Mummy bring Nina back in season 2 or 3 like he did in the comics (on the express condition that they kill him off afterwards or give some magical explanation on why he can’t bring her back a second time if she dies again)
2.) If they ever adapt the President Luther story have them be the “heroes” working with Captain Adam to bring in Clark and Bruce.
3.) A Batman movie with Dr. Phosphorus as the main antagonist or a flash back to Batman’s fight with Dr. Phosphorus in Batman Brave and The Bold.
4.) Eric returns
5.) King Shark references his new friends (Harley, Bloodsport, Ratcatcher, Sabastian and maybe Polkadot Man)
Is there a double standard against movies like Supergirl?
>The film’s lead, House of Dragons alum Milly Alcock, was dogged from the moment her casting was announced, with a disturbing amount of venom hurled at her physical appearance (something that has reached a disgraceful zenith since the film’s release). Add to that a female screenwriter in Ana Nogueira (along with the rabid disdain for Gunn’s supposed “woke agenda” from aspiring alpha male online gatekeepers), and from the beginning, the Manosphere was simply not going to allow it to succeed.
>A fierce torrent of dudebro think pieces, panel conversations, and supposed scoops flooded social media, each one working to one-up the others with sky-is-falling histrionics, Yellow-Sun-hot takes, and click-garnering thumbnails. More than any superhero movie since the first Captain Marvel film, have performative fragile males worked so hard to poison public sentiment before a second of footage was released.
>Alcock especially has been hounded by criticism over her physicality and her perceived lack of enthusiasm on the press circuit (Serious, “Maybe you should smile more” vibes). YouTube accounts such as Nerdrotic Daily and Geeks + Gamers, whose stable of mortally insecure, insufferable incels have been among those most ruthlessly attacking the actress in an effort to grow their already massive viewership among other easily-lured young men weaned on Conservative sexism and toxic masculinity.
>And, then, of course, there are the legions of perpetually lathered-up, zealous Zach Snyder fanboys who have been sitting vigil for the last couple of decades, and who want so desperately for the DCU to fail so that they can once again work themselves into a public frenzy to restore their beloved auteur to the lofty place they believe he alone deserves.
>But it isn’t easily intimidated conservative men only, as plenty of female content creators gleefully joined in the incessant crepe-hanging over the last few months, proving that it isn’t just the guys who are capable of manufacturing misogyny or being driven to corrosivity by declining revenue streams and oversaturated online spaces. To curry the favor of their largely male audiences, many women in these spaces have face-shamed Alcock with juvenile AI-generated caricatures.
>And let’s be clear: art’s interpretation is subjective, and there’s nothing wrong with criticisms grounded in substance, or admonishments about straying from the source material ( as happened here), but that’s not what this is, as evidenced by the giddy celebrations of the film’s financial failure among the men largely filling these spaces.
>Supergirl is a flawed yet well-crafted comic book movie. Alcock, especially, does wonderful work embodying the titular character and deserves to get further chances to bring Kara Zor-El to audiences. While it by no means reaches the stratospheric heights of Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight, Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 2, or the Russo Brothers’ Infinity War, it sure as heck isn’t Morbius, Black Adam, or Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, either.
>The sad truth is that even in comic book spaces that should be more evolved than other media landscapes, women actors, writers, artists, and directors still have to do three times the work to get a fraction of the credit. In an exponentially expanding virtual landscape where the lowest common denominator is courted and women are targeted, we’re going to continue to see these stories play out.
>Supergirl is a perfect example of how toxic content creators have ruined the experience of anticipating and seeing a comic book movie, spewing out a steady stream of negativity, speculation, rumor-mongering, and doom forecasting.
>By constantly competing in an oversaturated market, they build their brands on grievance, creating ever more incendiary content and engendering so much hatred toward a film before it’s even out that it doesn’t have a chance to be received on its merits.
>Combine that with the reality that 90 percent of these creators are dudes or women trying to draw their gaze, and a female-led superhero movie faces impossible scrutiny.
First Look at the prototype for the Lobo Sixth Scale Figure by HotToys.
Supergirl Review
Okay first off Milly was amazing and the movie was a solid 3.5-4/5
Ruthye’s character was a bit annoying at the start but after that she was great and loved her story but def wish a little less time was spent on her and more on Kara. The pacing was fine but some krypton scenes felt like they should’ve been placed earlier in the film for me idk maybe I’m just dumb.
Other than that Lobo was great, Supergirl was great, the villain was decent.
A perfect movie? Nah. An awful movie? Nah.
A good movie? Yeah I’d say it’s entertaining and fun, a lot more people should go see it especially if you have daughter as Kara is nothing but cool and badass.
3.5/5 decent to good movie.
One thing’s for sure, Supergirl has much more aura than Superman so far 🔥
Statements like this is probably the reason why critics have been unusually harsh on ‘Supergirl’.
Saying ”we won’t move ahead with a project until we have a great final script” and then, as the THR article revealed yesterday, literally appropriating the movie away from the director in post-production, who’s now publicly distancing himself from the final output, begs the question — don’t make lofty promises you can’t follow through on. Gunn the director surely has succeeded with ‘Superman’, but Gunn the studio executive has left a lot to be desired.
Can we stop declaring the DCU dead already?
It's honestly baffling how parts of the DC fandom (or at least the loudest part of it) behave. We're not even three movies into the DCU, yet some people are already declaring it a failure and are hating on James Gunn.
Yes, superhero movies aren't at the cultural peak they were during the 2010s, and DC's popularity has definitely taken a hit over the past decade. But that doesn't mean the genre is dead, or that the DCU is automatically doomed. I don't think Gunn is responsible for DC's decline, the actual reason is the DCEU.
A lot of people keep demanding Batman, Wonder Woman, and the Justice League immediately, but that's exactly the mentality that hurt the DCEU in the first place. Man of Steel released in 2013. Three years later we got Batman v Superman, and just one year after that came Justice League. Think about that for a second: the universe reached its biggest crossover before any character other than Superman even had a solo movie in that continuity. There was almost no time for world-building, no proper introduction to most of the heroes, and very little investment in the universe before asking audiences to care about a team-up.
I know there were massive behind-the-scenes issues, and I also think Zack Snyder's Justice League is a significantly better film than the theatrical version. But one of the biggest reasons it works better is simply because it had four hours to flesh out its characters and story, making everything somewhat feel connected. Even then, it still isn't a perfect foundation for a cinematic universe.
Now compare that to the MCU. People forget that the Infinity Saga wasn't built overnight. The first MCU film wasn't Spider-Man, Wolverine, or the X-Men—it was Iron Man, a character who wasn't Marvel's biggest name at the time. The Avengers wasn't the second or third movie, but it was the sixth. Marvel took time to establish its heroes, build its world, and earn its crossover.
That's why I don't understand people demanding a Justice League movie a year after Superman. Haven't we already seen where rushing leads?
So far, the DCU has released five projects, and in my opinion four of them have ranged from good to excellent. That's a far better batting average than many franchises get at the start. Yet people are acting as if every announcement is proof that the universe is collapsing.
Criticism is completely fair. If someone doesn't like Supergirl, that's reasonable. Even hating is justified till one point. But writing off an entire universe before it's even properly begun feels incredibly premature.
People also forget that the MCU succeeded with many weird choices. Many of Marvel's most popular characters. Spider-Man, the X-Men, and the Fantastic Four weren't available to Marvel Studios for years, yet the franchise thrived because audiences gave lesser-known characters a chance. James Gunn himself proved this with Guardians of the Galaxy, turning a relatively obscure comic team into one of Marvel's biggest successes.
Now he has access to DC's entire catalogue. Whether you like his style or not, shouldn't we at least give him enough time to actually build the universe before deciding it has failed?
The biggest lesson from the DCEU wasn't that audiences don't want DC. It was that you can't rush a cinematic universe. Consistency, patience, and strong world-building matter far more than racing toward the Justice League.
Give the DCU a few years. If it's still disappointing after that, criticize it all you want. But judging an entire universe before it's even had the chance to establish itself seems unfair.
RUMOR: Matt Reeves is pushing back not just the use of Battinson in the DCU, but the character of Batman in DCU as he believes Gunn’s Batman will hurt his The Batman IP
Cosmicbook News claims that their insiders have repeatedly been telling that Matt Reeves is pushing back not just the use of Battinson in DCU but the use of Batman per se in the DCU. Reeves believes that Gunn’s DCU is all over the place without a plan or firm creative oversight, that any inclusion of the character of Batman in ‘Man of Tomorrow’ or other DCU project could hurt his own ‘The Batman’ franchise.
If this is true, it’s really bizarre and shocking.
A) How Matt Reeves has so much power that he can dictate the use or block the use of Batman which is a different version from his, in the DCU?
B) Is James Gunn as head of DC Studios really in control of DC‘s most valuable property?
What do you guys think, if this report is true?
Grant Gustin in the DCU (ideas)
hear me out, what if we make Wally West the main Flash of the DCU and make Barry Allen the veteran Flash. We could have the flash movie where Barry is a Veteran Flash who finds out his brother in law or nephew (whatever relation they have in this universe) also has Super speed and trains him as Kid flash and then at the end of the movie, Barry get injured, leaving the mantle of the Flash to be open. West takes over as the Flash, maybe temporarily at first, Barry could maybe return for a Justice League movie and then permanently retire from being the Flash. Then Wally west is the permanent flash.
If you could change the dcu slate what would you do
I'd remove damain Wayne and I don't know why its a god and monsters chapters and the secend movie is in space
My Take On Wonder Woman Scenario #1
Hey everyone, so I finally got round to writing a single scenario made by u/LaylaLegion and how my Diana would react. First of many scenarios to come hopefully. It's by no means perfect or groundbreaking but without further delay, her it is :
Scenario #1 : A female criminal is given the Gorgon’s Eyes, a god artifact that grants the wearer the abilities of a Gorgon. She uses the artifact to rob under the name Madame Medusa. Diana later finds Madame Medusa kneeling in front of a statue of a small child, weeping hopelessly. The child is her own, an unintended victim.
My Diana’s Reaction & Scene : Diana had been tracking down Madame Medusa for days, until she finally found her. But instead of a cold, vicious villain she found a grieving mother.
"You're her, aren't you...?" Diana whispered, voice low and solemn.
Madame Medusa weakly turns her head.
Her eyes narrow at the sight of Wonder Woman, not poised and ready, not even armed but just present, standing there.
Diana, with closed eyes, moves forward in a single motion. Madame Medusa barely flinches, her grief consuming any trace of fear left within.
'At least I would be reunited with my son' She thought, but instead of a swift strike or painless death, Madame Medusa felt arms wrap around her in a firm embrace.
Her eyes widen in surprise, brows furrowing in confusion, all before the floodgates release once more.
"You don't understand, there is no reversing what happened today." She hisses.
"I know." Diana responds softly "But there is hope, preventing something like this from ever happening once more. You will answer for your crimes, all the pain and devastation you caused...but that doesn't have to be the end of your story. Come with me, I have friends who can help, teach you to deal with your condition...and create a future that honors him too."
Madame Medusa glances at her petrified son, a mix of emotions bubbling underneath the surface but Diana’s words resonate.
She doesn't open up further or reciprocate the physical contact, but in that moment, Madame Medusa simply allows herself to be hugged.