r/ezraklein

The recent Plain English episode on Weed and Alcohol was eye opening to me.

It was about weed’s displacement of alcohol and nicotine as American’s preferred vice of choice. And in the opening of the program Derek mentioned something he and I both find fascinating. Weed, or THC to be exact, tends to be associated with solo usage or small groups of friends. Think perhaps a group of four to five people. This is in stark contrast to alcohol which is, on average, makes us friendlier, more gregarious and in a bubblier type of mood. It’s often associated with groups, parties, and other activities that involve strangers meeting each other. This was kind of a revelation to me. But it makes intuitive sense when you think about books like Bowling Alone.

Americans are hanging out in ever smaller groups of people and, based on things like Twitch and other live stream Youtubers, nowadays the people we hang out with may not even be in the same room, state or even country. Our parents or grandparents generations didn’t have that luxury. They had friends in their churches, clubs or other organizations and they sometimes got stuck with annoying, arrogant, or unpleasant members. Alcohol helps ease those tensions and dull the annoyance. It enabled your dad or grandpa to go to their local American Legion, Elks Lodge, Freemasons, Union meeting, business luncheons etc. and deal with, whatever, that jackass Ben once they’ve had a few slippery martinis.

As those organizations wither and atrophy though, it follows that the lubricant that helped them run sees an equally strong shrinkage effect. Weed is the new drug of choice because we’re alone more then ever now and socializing in ever smaller numbers.

reddit.com
u/soozerain — 7 hours ago

Plain English: Higher Education’s Age of ‘Insufferable Hypocrisy’

Higher Education’s Age of "Insufferable Hypocrisy"
It would be an understatement to say that higher education is in crisis, as it faces attacks from both the current presidential administration as well as issues of its own making, like diversity politics. Today, Derek talks with Tyler Austin Harper, author of the viral essay “Confessions of a Token Black Professor,” about his critique of DEI and “wokeism” from the left. They discuss how good intentions and institutional self-interest led universities astray, and what it means for academic freedom, economic justice, and the future of higher education.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel here:
https://www.youtube.com/@PlainEnglishwithDerekThompson

If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.

Host: Derek Thompson

Guest: Tyler Austin Harper

Producer: Devon Baroldi

open.spotify.com
u/Dreadedvegas — 15 hours ago

PRINTER?! He Hardly Knew ‘Er! - Politix

https://www.politix.fm/p/printer-he-hardly-knew-er

>Jon Ossoff says he has no interest in running for president in 2028. But between fundraising prowess and narrative shaping and attention driving, he’s doing a better job of it than just about anyone else in the Democratic Party.

>In this episode, Matt and Brian discuss:

>The Natalie Harp ploy, and how Ossoff yoked national attention to Donald Trump’s broader degeneracy;

>Whether Ossoff provides (finally!) a template for the moderates-who-fight synthesis we’ve been promised;

>Unanswered questions about how much of this glow up is luck, and whether Ossoff’s actual record will hold up in a presidential primary, if he run and has a left-wing opponent.

>Then, Democratic Party officialdom has pulled back together pretty well after bruising primaries in Michigan and Wisconsin. But on the fringes, influential progressives and moderates continue to take potshots at the nominees they were hoping to beat: progressives at David Crowley in Wisconsin; moderates at Abdul el-Sayed in Michigan. What are they thinking? Could Bernie Sanders and AOC tamp down the cheap-seat heckling from the left? Could Chuck Schumer snuff out big-money anti-el-Sayed activism in the center? And where will moderate, pro-Israel Jewish voters take their political resources if they leave the Democratic Party, but have no home in the increasingly Groyperified GOP.

>Further reading:

>Brian asks why more Democrats don’t sound like Ossoff specifically on the Iran war question.

>Matt on the differences between the left-wing insurgency and the progressive establishment.

>Natalie Harp: More than Trump’s “human binkie.”

youtu.be
u/SomethingNew65 — 13 hours ago

Hook and Squeeze: How Democratic consultants, committees, and party leaders built a fundraising spam pipeline that funnels money from a captive pool of elderly donors into their own operations

data4democracy.substack.com
u/OmicronCeti — 1 day ago

Why isn't Ezra in the comments?

I've noticed a trend where the NYT writer who wrote a piece will engage with people in the comments section on NYT.

I've seen several of Ezra's guests do that as well, such as Chris Rufo or Bill McKibben.

I've never seen Ezra do this however. Has Ezra ever addressed why?

Does he view his Q&A episodes to fulfill that function?

reddit.com
u/cocoagiant — 4 days ago
▲ 31 r/ezraklein+1 crossposts

Woke Two: Cancellation Boogaloo?! - Politix

>Woke Two: Cancellation Boogaloo?!

>What to make of the progressive rethink of Woke One.

>Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders have conceded to the excesses of what we must all now call Woke One. But the concession, and that characterization of it, raise some obvious questions.

>In this episode, Matt and Brian discuss:

>What was Woke One;

>Which aspects of it do progressive leaders now concede were “crazy”;

>Why did it happen in the first place?

>Then, how relevant is any of this for near-term politics so long as Donald Trump is in power wrecking the economy? The country keeps losing jobs (or putting up extremely week monthly jobs numbers). Congress is about to give Trump more power to impose tariffs. And there’s no clear offramp to the war in Iran. Are Republicans simply fucked? If so, why hasn’t the war been a bigger political disaster for Trump? Could Democratic leaders forge a factional truce around a midterm-campaign promise to end the war next year? Or is it going to be 2007 all over again?

https://www.politix.fm/p/woke-two-cancellation-boogaloo

>
Further reading:

>Matt on how the high cost of living is tearing Republicans apart.

>Brian takes a stab at a Woke One origin story.

>Why are Democrats voting to give Trump more tariff power?

>The doctor advising Republicans on how to lose weight says his miracle diet gives him orgasmic, wipe-free poops.

youtu.be
u/SomethingNew65 — 7 days ago

Ezra’s Definition of Paganism

On his most recent pod interview with Ross, Ross and Ezra had this to say about Christianity, Paganism, and a random Wiccan comment:

Ross: I think what’s more common is a desire among people who are connected to Christianity, who are Christian and so on, to say: Well, where can we find greater strength? Where can we find greater toughness? How can we be more effective political actors? How can we defeat our enemies instead of having them vanquish us?

You could call it a reaching for pagan energy that doesn’t go all the way to actually becoming pagan. And look, the truth is that if you go back and look ——
Ezra: But Stephen Miller is not a Wiccan. [Laughs.]

This isn’t the first time I’ve heard Ezra talk about paganism in the same breath and Christianity and I’m so confused. Paganism is an ancient pre-Christian spiritual path. And neo-paganism is a very large umbrella - not all of us are right wing Nazi-esque neo pagans trying to take over Norse mythology and make it white supremacist bullshit. Is this what he’s referring to?

Pagans are reconnecting with Spirit - the earth and the divine energy within us all. Pagans are nice people damnit lol. How is “vanquishing enemies” “pagan energy”? Ross even later points out that Christians have a long history of violence (Crusades).

Some pagans describe themselves as witches, and some as Wiccan. But why is a Wiccan comment connected to Stephen Miller and in the same breath as Christianity? Both Ross and Ezra laugh and I just don’t get it…

There seems to be a weird fascination with paganism - I’ve heard Ezra mention it several times in head scratching ways.

Can someone explain this to me?? Thank you!!!

reddit.com
u/Waxing_Moon_13 — 6 days ago

Ross Douthat interview EkS show

Show notes :

My colleague Ross Douthat is leaving The Times after 17 years to become a correspondent on “60 Minutes.” Before he goes, I’m asking him a few questions.
Douthat has had a unique vantage point on the news media and politics over the last few decades. He’s typically held the role of explaining the right to more liberal audiences, starting as an undergrad, when he was a conservative columnist for The Harvard Crimson. Douthat has also lived through the seismic changes in the media from the both the inside and the outside: He’s made his career at legacy media institutions, but I first got to know him – and spar with him – as an early-2000s blogger (and I have the 20-year-old Bloggingheads.tv clips to prove it).
So what does Douthat make of the transformations he’s lived through? How did blogging change journalism? How did a Republican Party powered by evangelical Christians become a political party dominated by Catholics and pagans? What has he learned about persuasion from writing for liberal audiences? And with the resources of “60 Minutes” behind him, will he finally crack the U.F.O. story once and for all?
Mentioned:
Magnifica Humanitas by Pope Leo XIV
“Is It Time for a New Sexual Revolution?” with Louise Perry, Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
“Christopher Nolan’s Finest Trick” by Ezra Klein
Grand New Party by Ross Douthat and Reihan Salam
Book Recommendations:
Speak, Memory by Vladimir Nabokov
De Gaulle by Julian Jackson
Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson

nytimes.com
u/Character_Public3465 — 9 days ago

Kumbaya Watch on Edward Said on National Review Online

A good chunk of the recent "exit interview" of Ross Douthat centered the early blogging experience, and I thought it was worthwhile to go look up what that actually looked like.

This one is a somewhat representative sample of Ross's output from that era, which paints a more stark view or what the "war blogger" era was like.

I don't want to like, jump too hard on something that is now twenty five years old and a position that has been at least in part abandoned by its author, but at the same time, it's also a reminder of what that "golden age" of blogging actually entailed, and the quality of thought that was elevated afterward.

web.archive.org
u/Metacatalepsy — 8 days ago

lol Ezra’s answer on the Chris Ruffo pushback from fans question was such word salad and academia speak it made no sense.

At first he alluded to not pushing back hard enough was due to time constraints and then when claire called out it was over 2 hours he completely pivot to the typical “this isn’t a podcast where I tell ppl how to think”.

Nobody was asking to be told how to think, but a bit of honesty and challenging your guests especially if they have been a massive propagandist that help accelerate this past decade of far right fascist tendencies.

Look, Ezra is super successful and has a massive following and he clearly knows what he is doing to get attention and stay relevant.

Weather he wants to admit it consciously or not, but having guests like Rufo on is a sure fire way to garner attention and make that podcast episode talked about by a large swath of the population, case in point.

To have more episodes like that is to not make the guest super uncomfortable or ppl like rufo to not want to come in the future.

It’s disingenuous to say it was because of some higher, philosophical/academic free speech virtue of why he just let ruffo spread propaganda with very mild push back.

reddit.com
u/Puzzleheaded-Pin4278 — 12 days ago
▲ 16 r/ezraklein+1 crossposts

What Is The "Working Class?"

Relevance: Morris Katz was recently on Ezra Klein's pod. Article references how Katz, a Tribeca-born political strategist, was seeking a candidate in main who could appeal to a "cultural working class identity". But this approach often fails as it can leave out the actual working class, as it is focused on the visual markers rather than the true lived experience.

"There is a failure worth understanding here. Whether Platner was actually a working class American was never really the point. What mattered was whether he looked and felt like one. They needed a character to fill a role. The entire operation was so focused on finding someone who fit the part that they neglected the flags in Platner’s background.

We’ve built an entire political vocabulary around a group that everyone claims to represent and nobody has bothered to define. In the gap between the image and the reality, the people who actually need help keep getting left out."

sullysweekly.substack.com
u/Sullence — 10 days ago