r/gtmengineering

You HAVE to start replying to your prospects ASAP - ideally within the first hour of their response - and this is exactly how to do it

We recently did research on the ideal response time at Expandi, and these are some interesting metrics that we found:

Leads answered within five minutes convert around eight times better than the same leads answered a day later. Teams responding to intent signals within 2 hours consistently hit reply rates of 20%+ independent of the industry.

This might seem like a “cool, but what do I do with this?” kind of information, but it’s far from that, and could genuinely change a campaign’s success drastically. As the GTM director at Expandi, I deal with a lot of questions about why the campaigns aren’t performing ideally, and my first instinct is now to look into the average response time instead of messages/targeting. Because if the baseline response time is 8 hours, there is no point in looking any further. By the time a prospect receives your message, they are long gone from LinkedIn, and the message will probably get buried under a pile of others.

Now, being honest about the five minute number - on LinkedIn this mostly fiction; impossible to reach. Nobody sits in the inbox all day, replies can often arrive while you are on calls, sleeping, or outside your working hours. The realistic version is hours instead of minutes, and that alone is enough to begin with because, as mentioned above, consistently replying to prospects within the first 2 hours greatly increases the performance of the campaign. Teams acting on engagement within about two hours tend to hold reply rates above 20%, which is roughly double what the same teams see on cold outreach. But if you really, really want to pull the most out of your campaign and optimize for responses under 1 hour, this is how you do it:

  • Move LinkedIn notifications into whatever you already have open all day, usually Slack or a shared inbox. The LinkedIn app itself is rarely open all day, but Slack probably is. If you want to take it a step further, use another platform specifically for this with a distinct sound that your SDRs don’t hear all day because they’re not used to it and will instantly know what’s up when the notification comes. For example, you can set up a Discord server and push only the notifications from your outreach campaign there. The sound of the pings is different than Slack, so the SDRs will know instantly to jump in and check the response.
  • Assign one named owner per account and write it down. Two reps each assuming the other has the thread is the most common way a warm reply dies, and it costs nothing to fix. The alternative is to create an option for the SDRs to check the replies they are handling, so the other ones can know if it’s taken care of.
  • Split the queue in two. Someone who replied to you needs an answer today, while someone who only viewed a profile or liked a post can wait until tomorrow without any damage. Your focus should be on the ones who replied, and always make that a priority.
  • Set a floor rather than a target. Every open thread gets touched within one working day, even when the honest answer is just a note saying you will come back to it properly. Early on, this probably won’t even be an issue, but as you scale and more responses pile up, it’s smart to categorize them. If there’s an urgent/hot conversation or a prospect interested in your product/service, that’s where you want your SDRs to be, compared to a prospect asking for a deck to read when they have time. There is a way to automate this actually, and it’s relatively easy to set up. Just funnel the responses to an AI agent first - you can create one with Claude - teach the agent to categorize the responses into, let’s say, 3 tiers based on priority, and have the agent funnel the already evaluated messages to the channel. This way your SDRs can just open the channel and instantly see what to jump on right away, and what can be handled later.
  • Keep drafted responses for the handful of replies you can predict - pricing, timing, "send me something". This is very important because people get tired, and speed should not depend on whether the rep still has writing energy late in the day. Templates help them deal with that, and the more you have, the easier it becomes. Ultimately, you can set up AI SDRs to dynamically draft the messages based on the prospect’s responses, and the human SDRs just review, improve, and send. But this takes a lot of time to do properly, so early on, it’s best to handle it all manually.
  • Check the age of your oldest unanswered thread once a week. That one number will tell you more about the system than reply rate does.
  • None of this makes the outreach itself better. You still need to set up your campaigns properly, target the right leads, craft the right messages. This “just” stops losing the leads from the outreach, which for most teams I've looked at is the larger of the two problems.

So, if we go by the Discord example, this is how the final setup could look:

Fresh Discord accounts (we don’t want any random pings) + a fresh Discord server to ensure these pings stay unique and distinctive for the SDRs. A channel (or channels) to which all the prospects’ responses are pushed. The responses first get funneled to an AI agent that’s trained to 1) evaluate them; 2) draft a templated response (for the pricing, timing, "send me something" and similar messages). The agent pushes the evaluated leads to these Discord channels with a templated message in some instances. The SDRs pick the leads, check them to signify they are taken care of, and use the templated messages when needed. The response time drops to under 2 hours, and you suddenly can’t deal with all these leads and money.

reddit.com
u/cosankov — 1 day ago

Clay, Seamless and Clari all moved into the layer next door in the same week

i track vendor moves for a weekly thing I write, and this week three of them lined up in a way I hadnt seen before.

Clay shipped Workflows, which is orchestration. Seamless shipped AI Smart Fields, which is enrichment-by-prompt, basically Claygent's primitive in an incumbent. Clari announced a partnership that puts an agent on inbound replies and points legacy email customers at a migration guide.

Three companies, same week, each one moving into the layer next to it.

Then Seismic and Highspot closed their merger on Monday. 2,500 customers, 3.5M users, one company under the Seismic name.

So it's running two directions at once. Layers absorbing adjacent layers, and peers merging into each other. either way the number of indy vendors in your stack goes down.

The part I keep chewing on: if your glue lives in n8n or Zapier, the company that owns your data is now also selling glue. And the feature you picked a vendor for last year is turning into a checkbox on somebody bigger's roadmap.

Which of your tools that you really care about (!) do you think gets absorbed next?

reddit.com

Start-up GTM Stack

What’s the best data infrastructure for a GTM stack?

I’ve got the following constraints:
- Lists of companies generated from various online data sources via csvs + things like Apollo
- Data connected across various tools e.g. sales call recordings, CRM, analytics, etc.

I’m thinking of:
- Fivetran + dbt: ETL
- Snowflake: Storage

Supabase could work, but I’m worried supabase write back into the CRM or Clay will be manual and harder to maintain.

Thoughts?

reddit.com
u/Ok-Dragonfly-158 — 1 day ago

Is the minimalist gtm stack actually achievable or does every team end up with 6 tools no matter what

Every team starts lean but six months later there's an enrichment tool, something for signals, a supabase database someone built, a sequencer, and zapier holding it together.

Each tool made sense when added. The stack grew one decision at a time and now it's a maintenance job. One person understands the supabase tables and nobody else touches it.

Has anyone stayed lean past the early stage, or does this just happen to everyone?

reddit.com
u/Tall_Bookkeeper4199 — 1 day ago

I want to start with GTM Engineer / Stragist role, suggest resources.

Hello guys,

I have been into Marketing since 5 years. Mainly social media marketing and decently successful in it, but I want to love to explore GTM as a field.

First I want to know if GTM Stragist and GTM Engineer are same role, if No what's difference.

Then if you some of you came across, resource. I'd appreciate the help.

Have a nice day you all

reddit.com
u/armourrx — 1 day ago

Fractional GTM ENGINEER

Is anyone here working as a fractional GTM engineer while balancing a Full time role at another company

If yes, how did you become a F GTME- what are the hours and pay like?

reddit.com
u/Working-Scarcity9806 — 2 days ago
▲ 8 r/gtmengineering+1 crossposts

We launched on PH today and got bunch of cold emails and linkedin messages: my take on each

Note that I am open open to cold emails in general, so I read and try to engage if it can be helpful for my product. Here are some examples (without exposing the brands/people):

Example email 1)

Hi there,

Congrats on the Product Hunt launch today. Deterministic agents that follow your process is the right framing. The value is not that agents run, it is that someone can see they ran correctly.

...

Whats wrong: he literally took our launch title and ask LLM to generate first paragraph, rest is just describing his service... At least scrape the website, competitors, find something we (think) are unique and say something like "hey I saw your launch, it is pretty interesting idea, how did you come up with it?"

---

Example email 2)

Developers evaluating agent frameworks default to whatever PH surfaces first. The top-ranked agent tools become the starting point for experimentation. Controller AI's deterministic approach is architecturally stronger than most alternatives above it on the board. But at rank 60, developers never see it to test it. The agent builders in the top 20 are collecting those first experiments right now. Tonight's freeze makes rank 60 the final position.

300 profiles remain.

$2/upvote. [website] for packages. Last window for Controller AI.

Best,
[website]

Whats wrong: I have no idea what is offered until the last sentence. Too complicated, too long - cant read it.

---

Example email 3)

Hey,

Controller AI caught my eye on Product Hunt - "Build deterministic agents that actually follow your process".

We're curating our August 2026 batch at [website] - each product gets:
- A permanent indexed page + backlink from a DR 56 site
- Placement in our monthly batch browsed by founders and early adopters

Starts at $20/year. Takes about 2 minutes:
[link]

Interested?

What's wrong: I think intro is just static placeholder replacement, our tagline goes into their opening - its fine but feels obvious. Service offering is clear, CTA is good, but I don't know why would I want to buy it from you, it lacks a sentence maybe after initial opening, something like - we are the best at getting you backlinks, here is our list of clients.

---

Example email 4)

Saw Controller AI launch on Product Hunt, congrats!

Do you already have an affiliate program?

I run [brand], where creators discover affiliate programs and products they can promote.

If you have one, we can list Controller AI and put it in front of creators actively looking for new products to promote.

[link]

Cheers,

[name]

Founder, [brand]

What's wrong: Overall good message, I considered but I dont really know if it would work for us, maybe explain why would I want affiliate programs, are they helping my product grow faster or what exactly the benefit I get?

---

Example email 5)

Can i get you top 2 rank on all the directories and even on your today
launch on Product Hunt

 Email: [email]

 Telegram: [link]

What's wrong: So many things... Just dont put telegram link to your email pls.

---

Example linkedin message 1)

Congrats on your launch!

i saw your product hunt launch did you need real ph usvers votes i will provide you so let us know if you want you will get result thats my promise you did not get result i will refund your money...
i charge small fess for it   thats my promise you will get result if you will not get i will refund your money...
so let us know if you want our services...

What's wrong: everything. I cant read it to begin with.

---

Example linkedin message 2)

Congratulations on the launch! 🚀

It’s exciting to see your product live. I help startups secure Top ranking through strategic manual engagement with my team of 100 people—no bots, just authentic social signals to give you that extra push.

Pricing:
• 100 Upvotes and comments: $50

What' wrong: I think it is pretty clear, I am just not the right person as I dont believe spending money is a good idea for this. But the message is clear.

---
Example linkedin message 3)

Loved your tool on PH!

I share top tools with my 130K+ audience across LinkedIn, X, and Telegram. I’ve helped 1,000+ products gain traction, including multiple Top 5 PH launches Like:- Krisp, Liveblocks, Origami.chat, Lovable, EditWithAva etc

Do let me know if you are up for the collab🚀🔥!

What's wrong: Overall it is good, first sentence is feels fake - he never even seen my product and its obvious but anyway. The offer is clear and I like that the CTA with icons - maybe its just me. But again not for me.

---

Anyway, these are my opinion, I am not great copywriter either but I wanted to give you the perspective of the other side.

u/fredstyle — 2 days ago
▲ 8 r/gtmengineering+1 crossposts

Can we start a market on Polymarket for when Hubspot acquires Clay?

It seems so predictable. Particularly with recent features like workflows being added to Clay.

reddit.com
u/0____0_0 — 2 days ago

Need Help! Built real n8n/AI automation (WhatsApp API, Gemini parsing, lead pipelines) but no formal GTM title—does this read somewhere near "GTM engineer," and what should I build next?

I've spent the last few months building GTM-adjacent automation systems and want an honest read on where I actually stand.

What I've built:

  • A 5-workflow real estate lead system: lead intake with dedup and scoring from various sources, writes to a CRM layer, a WhatsApp Cloud API bot that qualifies leads conversationally, a nurture sequence, site-visit scheduling with real calendar booking, and a reporting rollup—all tested end-to-end against real Meta and Google infrastructure, not mock data.
  • From that, landed an actual sales call with a prospective client, which reshaped the build.
    • Their problem statement: Parse an open house sign-in sheet that contains client information, add the information to the CRM, read the daily digest email of off-market houses, parse property information from it (avoid ads and irrelevant information), add the property information to the CRM, match the property and buyers, and semail/WhatsAppsapp alerts automatically as soon as there is a match.
    • I built a working workflow using Google Sheets as a CRM.
  • A lead-gen scraper (Google Places search → dedup → website scrape → email extraction) feeding a two-workflow cold email system: a daily sequence sender and a reply/stop-detection workflow that reads inbox replies and automatically updates lead status so the sender skips anyone who responded or opted out—something similar to Clay and Instantly
  • A couple of smaller side builds on the same pattern: an AI news digest (RSS → LLM extraction → daily email) and a resume-to-job-match tool using embeddings and similarity scoring and adding the information to Airtable.

I know Clay (used its free credits to find, enrich, transform, and export data) and Instantly (only familiar with the tool through tutorials). Didn't use it), and SQL basics, but I built most of the above myself in n8n instead of reaching for off-the-shelf tools—partly budget (trying to keep tool spend near zero), partly because I like to actually experiment and research a problem, explore all the possible solutions, and go for the best.

Where I think I'm weak: no real CRM experience (Salesforce/HubSpot—everything above uses Sheets/Airtable as a stand-in)

What I'm asking:

  1. Does this read as near GTM-engineer level—yes or no? In either case, what should I build next that would actually teach me something new, not just more of the same pattern?
  2. As per my research, the one skill that is required here is to understand a business and its problems deeply. How can I actually solve one? Are there platforms where people write about such problems and anyone can pick and experiment?
  3. What tools or techniques am I genuinely missing to move toward this role?

I would really appreciate the guidance here!

reddit.com
u/beliketrilok — 3 days ago

How are you all actually mapping and sizing your TAM these days?

So I run cold email / outbound (for my beginning agency) and I keep seeing people on LinkedIn and X talk about TAM mapping like it’s the most important thing you can do before you send a single email. A lot of the folks saying it seem to actually know what they’re talking about, and honestly it’s making me feel like I’m stuck doing outbound the old way (build a big list, spray, pray, iterate, fin a new segment).

I want to fix that but I’m a bit lost on the how, so I figured I’d just ask people who do this for real.

A few things I’m trying to wrap my head around:

  • Why has this step become such a big deal now?
  • How do you actually map your market in practice? What tools, what data sources, what does your process look like start to finish?
  • How do you segment once you’ve got the market mapped? I sort of get the idea but I’d love to hear how you actually cut it (industry, size, tech stack, signals, whatever you use).
  • And how do you tier it? My assumption is something like: tier 1 gets cold call + LinkedIn + cold email, tier 2 gets LinkedIn + cold email, tier 3 just cold email. Is that roughly how you think about it or am I oversimplifying?

Basically I want to move from “segment A list” then I try "segment B list" to something structured where the effort matches the account value.

If you’ve got a process that works, a tool stack you like, or even just a YouTube video or two that made it click for you, I’d really appreciate it. Trying to learn from people who’ve actually done it instead of just the LinkedIn hype.

Thanks a lot.

reddit.com
u/Alternative-Gas8641 — 3 days ago

What tools do you need in a cold outbound stack for a small B2B team?

Starting to build out our first outbound motion at a 10-person legal tech company, and trying to figure out what the core tool categories are before committing to subscriptions.

We have Sales Navigator and HubSpot already, but the prospecting-to-sequence pipeline is still manual, and we're losing time on enrichment since we're still scrubbing lists in spreadsheets before anything goes into a sequence.

Lemlist is in some threads here for the sequencing layer, and we're between that and a couple of other options while also figuring out whether Clay or something lighter is the right call on enrichment.

What I'm trying to understand is how many of these categories need separate tools (data, enrichment, sequencing, warm-up, CRM) or how many collapse into one platform at this stage without losing much, because the budget pressure is real and the overlap risk feels high.

So what would you do first if you were in this spot?

reddit.com
u/Just_Avocado_1792 — 4 days ago

Interviewing a GTM Engineer for the first time. What should I look for?

I’m about to interview a GTM Engineer, and honestly, I have no idea what I should be looking for.

I’m a PMM at an AI startup, and we’re hiring a GTM Engineer to work with me, so I’m part of the interview loop.

I know the basics of what GTM Engineers do, but I don’t really know what separates a good one from a great one.

Right now I’m thinking about looking at measurable outcomes like pipeline, user acquisition, revenue impact, workflow automation, etc. But how do you actually judge those numbers? What questions would you ask? What are the green flags or red flags?

I’ve already asked ChatGPT and Claude, but their answers were way too strategic and abstract. Can I expect more tactical, real-world hiring advice from people here?

If you’ve hired GTM Engineers (or are one yourself), I’d love to hear how you evaluate candidates.

reddit.com
u/nameless_witchw — 4 days ago

complete beginner at cold email - where do I even begin?

Our team has been trying to figure out cold email for the past month and honestly feeling pretty lost. My boss wants me to start reaching out to potential clients but I have no idea where to begin.

I've read some basic cold email tips online but they all seem to contradict each other. Some say keep it super short, others say you need to personalize everything. Some say follow up 7 times, others say that's too pushy. My boss keeps asking for updates and I don't even have a coherent strategy to show him yet.

Right now I'm manually finding contacts on LinkedIn which takes forever. Tried a few chrome extensions but the data is usually outdated. Been looking at tools like Cognism and Apollo for finding email addresses at scale. Also checking out Prospeo since a couple people in another thread said the accuracy is better, but haven't pulled the trigger on any paid tools yet.

For those who do cold email outreach successfully, what actually works? Should I focus more on the email copy or on finding the right contacts first? And how many follow ups is too many? Any cold email tips that actually get replies would be huge.

reddit.com
u/No-Top9040 — 4 days ago

Best opensource linkedin outreach tool?

Hello, I'm looking for opensource / free alternatives for heyreach / closely / phantom buster for Linkedin outreach. I will be testing these on my secondary account so even if its risky it works for me. Thanks in advance

reddit.com
u/Repulsive-Remote-694 — 4 days ago

Looking to contribute to an early-stage startup: GTM/PMM, research, or customer acquisition (open to unpaid work)

Hi everyone,

I'm a 3rd-year BTech CSE student currently trying to build practical experience in product marketing and GTM.

I want to be upfront about where I stand: I don't have professional GTM experience yet, and I'm not going to pretend that a few personal projects make me an experienced GTM professional. What I do have is a foundation in product work and a strong interest in learning through actual execution.

I've previously done internships/volunteer work around product management, including:

Market and competitive research

Research around LLM-based products/apps

Working with specialists on feature development

Collaborating with engineering teams on feature implementation/integration

Over the past few months, I've been moving toward PMM/GTM and have been using real-world startups as case studies. I've worked on things like:

ICP and market research

Positioning & messaging

Competitive analysis

Customer lifecycle / time-to-value analysis

Identifying potential growth bottlenecks

Thinking through acquisition and GTM channels

Developing marketing/GTM strategies from publicly available data

The limitation I've repeatedly run into is that personal projects can only take you so far.

You can analyze a company's positioning from the outside, but you don't have access to its actual customer conversations, sales pipeline, conversion data, retention data, experiments, etc. And that's exactly the experience I'm trying to gain now.

So here's what I'm looking for:

I'm not specifically looking for a "GTM internship", because GTM covers a huge range of work.

I'd be interested in helping an active early-stage startup with whatever area actually needs attention: customer research, competitive research, positioning, messaging, acquisition experiments, channel research, conversion, or other marketing/growth work.

I'm also open to doing this unpaid initially.

The main thing I'm looking for is the opportunity to actually work on a real product, with real customers and real constraints, rather than continuing to work only through hypothetical case studies.

There are no big expectations from my side. Give me a real problem, let me put in the work, and we can see whether I'm actually useful.

If you're building something and could use an extra pair of hands on the product/GTM/marketing side, feel free to DM me. I'd be happy to share the projects I've worked on and see if there's a fit.

reddit.com
u/Stunning-Extension80 — 5 days ago

Looking for a GTM Engineering / Founder's Office / Growth Role in Bangalore

Hey everyone, I'm 25.

I have 3 years of experience, with 1.5 years as the sole GTM operator at an early-stage AI startup in the founder's office. Built the entire revenue engine from scratch: signal-based outbound, CRM architecture, AI agent workflows, enrichment pipelines, sales calls, client delivery, and reporting, all simultaneously with no team and no playbook.

A few things I'm proud of: 7% reply rate on email campaigns (industry average is 2%), 100% positive replies, generated 1Cr+ in revenue, and built a production AI agent (n8n + Apify + Clay + OpenAI) that competes functionally with Trigify, built solo in 2 weeks, live inside a commercial product today.

I'm looking for an early-stage startup where I'm building something, not maintaining someone else's playbook. Open to GTM Engineering, RevOps, Growth Generalist, AI Product, or Founder's Office roles.

If you're hiring or know someone who is, I'd love a conversation. Happy to share my resume over DM.

Thanks!

reddit.com
u/xotwoduiux — 4 days ago
▲ 59 r/gtmengineering+2 crossposts

GTM HyPe Gonna Be dead soon

GTM IS DEAD. Your $150k GTM Engineer title is a scam and the bubble is about to burst.

This bubble is gonna burst harder than Prompt Engineer and Growth Hacker did.

You guys are NOT engineers. You are Zapier janitors connecting Apollo to Clay to HubSpot and calling it "architecture".

Everyone saw a salary screenshot on LinkedIn and now thinks they are technical.

Stop chasing titles. You don't know business.
Learn the boring stuff first:

  1. SALES. Real sales. How to take 80 NOs on a cold call without crying. Not how to write a sequence in Lemlist.

  2. MATHS. CAC, LTV, payback, margin, unit economics. The actual business math.

  3. PROCESS. How a sales process actually works from lead to cash, not just how to enrich a lead.

If your entire skill is "I know Clay", AI will replace you in 6 months. If you know how to sell and how business makes money, you'll survive.

If you want to be a real GTM, learn GTM = Go-To-Market = how to take something to market and make it profitable. It's not a tool stack.

Rant over.

reddit.com
u/niranvee — 7 days ago

FullEnrich vs Apollo for email and phone data

We're an SDR team of 8 on Apollo for outbound, with find rate somewhere in the 50s for a while now and mobile coverage dropping off hard on anything EU-based.

So we're burning through credits on bad data and eating into send limits with bounces.

Started looking at whether a waterfall enrichment setup would lift those numbers or just add another bill, and from what I've read in this sub FullEnrich, BetterContact, and Prospeo are the ones that come up for the comparison.

Can't figure out from the docs whether that find rate improvement holds on EU lists or mainly shows up on US ones, since EU phone is where we're bleeding most, and the credit model makes it hard to benchmark without running a test batch first.

So if you made the switch from Apollo to FullEnrich for the data layer, what did find rate look like afterward?

I'd appreciate any pointers here.

reddit.com
u/roxylezan — 4 days ago

Why do SaaS vendors hate their power users?

SaaS companies say they build for power users. They don't. Two conversations this year made that feel like an open secret instead of a hunch.

Vendor A, a tool I use every day: no open API, because they didn't want to spend on the data infrastructure it would take. I asked them directly: is that more expensive than losing customers over it, or the user base you're leaving on the table by not building it? You don't have to commit to a full build, just a POC with a handful of power users to see if they'd actually use it. Instead I built my own workaround, pulling data off a webhook and vibe-coding an app to route leads, doing manually with Cursor what the platform already knew how to do internally. It just never exposed it.

Vendor B, a tool I was evaluating: no public API docs for a feature they were about to ship. I told them agents are starting to decide what tools get bought based on how good the documentation is. They pointed me at their brand new MCP like that closed the loop. It doesn't. Most MCP implementations I've seen are a glorified chat window bolted onto a UI I still have to log into. When I wire APIs directly into Cursor or Claude Code, I know exactly what data is feeding the workflow. A chat window inside someone else's app tells me nothing about what it's actually pulling or why.

Every SaaS platform has the same unsolved problem: you sell to the purse holder, but you have to build for the practitioner. Most platforms optimize for the bottom 90% of users and buyers because the retention math says they can get away with it. The top 10% just build around the gap.

So we do. Two things I've actually shipped because a vendor wouldn't:

No vendor sells "watch every target account for a job posting that matches our ICP and draft the outreach automatically." Sales Nav tells you someone got hired somewhere new. Nobody tells you a company is hiring for a role that signals budget or pain right now. So I built a bot that watches target companies for postings like that, drafts the outreach, and drops it in Slack for a rep to approve. Reps just click yes.

Nothing in our stack could tell us whether outbound actually influenced a deal. So I built a portal that pulled every outbound tool and the CRM into one place, matched campaign recipients to deal contacts by email address, and required a human to approve or deny each match before it counted toward attribution. Fast, auditable, and it didn't touch the approved historical numbers while we figured it out.

Neither of those needed a vendor's permission or roadmap. They needed an API key and somewhere to host the result.

When I'm evaluating a GTM engineer now, the first thing I want to see is a GitHub repo. Not because the code needs to be impressive. Because it tells me whether someone treats their operational knowledge as something worth building and versioning, or just something they complain about in Slack until the next tool comes along and does the same thing to them.

If you've ever vibe-coded around a vendor's missing endpoint instead of waiting on their roadmap, you already know which side of this you're on.

reddit.com
u/BenyaminHolley — 5 days ago