r/itsthatbad

\"All Natural\" \"No Filter\" \"Woke Up Like This\"

Leftover catladies are so bitter that they are leftover.

>"If you aren't dating over-the-hill or menopause-ready chopped women, you must like 13 year olds" "

They do the same thing when you refuse to date a 300+ pound WHALE

>"Oh, so you like prepubescent bodies?"

Something seriously wrong with these retards. Look at what they do to their faces!!!

https://preview.redd.it/dekgpfyjkwth1.png?width=460&format=png&auto=webp&s=dfaf9192927ce0eec8c9167cb3944e96725fc61b

This is the type of women calling you 'incel' by the way. Over 40. Unwanted. Close to 300 pounds. Triple chin. Have to wear a tablecloth cuz nothing fits. 10+ cats. Can't even reach to wipe her fatass. Last sex she had was in high school. LMAO

https://preview.redd.it/ujpqaxmrl5uh1.png?width=722&format=png&auto=webp&s=d2739d7ba5e13783461ece964419312c8fbb8315

https://preview.redd.it/sqoivhdtl5uh1.png?width=665&format=png&auto=webp&s=092d19b89263c9072944c0ef1f8c93c162761726

https://preview.redd.it/sen52qxam5uh1.png?width=1229&format=png&auto=webp&s=a92f484f69faa78f7591c4b49c8076a0c4aac799

https://preview.redd.it/kn6a2hngm5uh1.png?width=970&format=png&auto=webp&s=92c25325db03e6d0548d772378b9e4d9ada27578

https://preview.redd.it/0tnnchlhm5uh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=9cf8533bba36f2d49ca3f45a54ccc29813f7cb91

Answer: hybristophilia

If you don’t know who that is, you almost certainly will soon. He’s a newish TikToker who recently collabed with clavicular and hexumlite. His content is documenting his journey as a very neurodivergent 24 year old who has no experience with women.

It’s hard to put his content into a few short sentences, but essentially, this is the best example we’ve ever had to find out what it takes to go from an incel to a guy who has no problem with hook-ups.

I guarantee that his height will be the biggest factor, by far. If I’m even close to being wrong, may my words mean nothing to any of you forever.

More than his face (which is already good), more than his physique (which is already extremely good), more than money, social skills, personality, style, the type of women he’s approaching or the style of his approaches.

Not only will it be comfortably the biggest barrier, I believe it will ruin his chances. And when it does, it should be the biggest wake up call for ~99% of people who think they have the slightest clue what they’re on about when giving men advice, because he’s not even that short. At about 171cm, around 1 in 5 men across the usa and europe have it just as bad or worse than him in the height department. Think of how many tens of millions more are in the 5’8”-5’9”/10” range. And for every one of them they can literally do everything right and still not stand a chance.

And that’s JUST the massive chunk of men that are eliminated ONLY from height. Not even including guys that are 5’11”-6’1” but aren’t top 5-10% looks. Not even including guys that are 6’2”-6’3” but not in the top 20% of looks etc. And not including guys that are extremely ND.

Best 99% of guys can do is betabuxx or oofy doofy.

As an East Asian man, I think the “get a passport” advice makes a lot of sense.

I saw the pinned post telling single Western men to get passports and look abroad for wives. Asia is the most populous continent, so obviously it is one of the places people have in mind.

Unironically, I think this can work.

For years, Westerners have told us that East Asian women live under patriarchy, while Western societies treat women better, give them higher status and expect men to respect them more.

A lot of gender discourse in East Asia, especially in China and South Korea, makes essentially the same comparison.

In its more radical forms, sex, marriage, childbirth and mate choice are treated quite explicitly as political leverage. Women are encouraged to refuse local men sex, marriage and children, to let local male bloodlines end, and to choose Western — often specifically white — men instead.

The logic is straightforward. Local men are associated with patriarchy. Western men are associated with societies believed to treat women better. Denying the former descendants becomes punishment; having children with the latter becomes reward.

And the endpoint matters. The idea is not simply that individual East Asian men lose dates or wives. Their genes are supposed to disappear with them, while the genes of the preferred male population continue through the same women.

That turns mate choice into population-level selection.

East Asian men and Western men become two male populations judged against the same standard: which population is more feminist, which treats women better, which represents the better gender order, and therefore which population should leave more descendants.

This is where the logic starts to resemble livestock or cattle breeding.

In animal breeding, the breeder identifies desirable traits, reproduces the stock believed to carry them, and selects against the stock considered undesirable. The result is population change across generations.

The political version applies the same structure to men.

Women are not passive breeding stock in this model. They are the selectors. Men are the livestock being evaluated.

“Respect for women,” “patriarchy,” “misogyny” and “gender equality” are treated as characteristics of male populations. East Asian men are cast as the “inferior” male population because they are associated with patriarchy, misogyny and worse treatment of women. Western — especially white — men are cast as the preferred male population because they are associated with feminism, gender equality and better treatment of women.

The individual man becomes secondary. The unit being evaluated is the population.

If East Asian women who would otherwise have children with East Asian men instead have children with Western — often white — men, reproductive capacity is redirected from the East Asian male population toward the Western male population. Western male lineages, associated with feminism and better treatment of women, leave more descendants. East Asian male lineages, associated with patriarchy and worse treatment of women, leave fewer. Taken far enough, the desired endpoint is exactly what the rhetoric sometimes says openly: let the local male bloodline end and let its genes disappear.

That is why I think “sexual selection” alone is too weak a description.

Once female mate choice is consciously understood as a power to produce population-level reproductive outcomes, and women are encouraged to use that power to reward one male population and eliminate another from reproduction, reproductive selection has been weaponized.

You can call that weaponized eugenics, political sexual selection, decentralized selective breeding, or decentralized biopolitics. The name matters less than the structure: reward the approved male population with reproduction and punish the disapproved population by withholding it.

And this is where East Asian female agency matters.

A Western man coming to Asia may think he is simply entering a better dating market. He may be right.

The woman choosing him may also know exactly what she is doing.

She may regard Western men as belonging to a male population that treats women better. Choosing one can mean escaping local patriarchy, rewarding the preferred male population, and refusing to reproduce with the “inferior” local one.

She is exercising selection power herself.

So yes, Western men may genuinely have an advantage here. Part of that advantage can come from the fact that you are ranked above us under the same standard: which population is more feminist and treats women better.

From the perspective of this selection system, Western men are the preferred stock and East Asian men are the stock being selected against.

I also understand why some of you want to leave the West.

Your societies already give women much higher status than ours do, and Western men are already expected to show women much more respect than men here are. Yet the hatred directed at Western men in contemporary gender discourse seems, if anything, at least as strong as the hatred East Asian women direct at men like us.

So I understand the desire to escape.

And yes, East Asia may genuinely be a good option for lots of you. If you find yourselves more welcome here than at home, this is part of the gender politics behind that advantage.

But I would treat this as a temporary solution.

Long term, you probably still need to deal with the gender politics in your own societies rather than assume there will always be somewhere else to go. The same feminist norms some Western men are trying to escape are being exported into every modern society, including ours.

East Asia is not moving away from the Western model. It is moving toward it.

And as those norms spread, your pool of “wife material” will only keep shrinking.

​

Women don't even consider bottom 80% of men as existing, so when they say they want a nerd they're picturing a top 20% dude but also one who is "nerdy" enough to not have a roster and be a fuckboy i.e. they still want a top tier attractive man but one who doesn't have a harem

Splitting this out from a comment I made because it needs to be said and put out front. I hope this will give you something to think about out versus some of the other posts I’ve been seeing (dogs wtaf guys come on!). SO What messed the west up so bad??

Money talks. Women bring in money. That’s why they have free ladies nights at bars.

Do some research and you’ll see the west uses women to feed its fat cash hungry self. It does it by quietly allowing them to do whatever.

Dating apps
Social media
Groups
Hiring policies

All for the money. You look at the paper trail of money it usually involves women. Male thirst is what spends money. Tale as old as time.

There’s great women out there brooo you just have to find the one for you maaaan. You can’t just generalise a WHOLE group of people based on how they ALL are— like every single one of them, ya know? It’s fricking bigoted or something. You must’ve lost your mind to view a group of people accordingly to how ~80% of them openly act. Of course we can view behaviours and traits that stay consistent in every single individual of a given species, why would that apply to women? They’re perfect angels, didn’t anyone tell you?