r/kanpur

Platform no. 1 of the Kanpur Central Railway Satation.

Ordered food and I found an insect.

I took a picture and called the guy serving the food. He immediately took the insect out, crushed it with his fingers and threw it and said It's rice dhan (paddy) and dismissed it saying he can give me a different item on the menu. I said No, took my refund and left.

When I showed the picture to others the owner said, why are you advertising? Don't you have some humanity?

Like What!? He's feeding insects to other humans and calling me inhumane when I point it out?

We need Tukaram Mundhe in every city on the country

So, today I had one of the Best boneless fish fry and most delicious flavourful chicken biryani in Kanpur at my favourite place….
Biriyani Full Plate 180/-
Fish Fry 400/-
Location: Al Zanis Jajmau Kanpur

Last week, I bought a Sprite bottle for ₹35 from a retail store. Turns out it's a 740 ml bottle for ₹35.

Today, I ordered a few items from Swiggy Instamart and happened to place Sprite as well but noticed that there's a difference in price which is ₹40 for 750 ml.

What made me ponder is that are there separate prices for products sold in offline market vs e-commerce platforms such as Swiggy Instamart / Blinkit / Zepto?

Did you ever notice something like this before? For a product which is bought and consumed often.

TL;DR: I found deeply problematic content in a Joyful Living value education textbook used in schools, including homophobic claims, victim-blaming in a rape case study, sexist narratives, and outdated information.

School name: Fatima Convent school kanpur

Update: The principal did not reply to the complaint and told me to come to the school physically which isn't possible, so I'm planning to escalate the situation.

Well, I recently came across some very concerning content in a Value Education textbook titled Joyful Living, used in schools.

Some of the material includes:

- Homophobic and medically inaccurate claims: The book describes homosexuality as a "perversion" and associates it with the breakdown of human communities. it also presents masturbation as something harmful and debilitating.

- Victim blaming in a rape case study: One of its case studies describes a girl who is raped and then asks students whether she was responsible and how she could have avoided it.

- Sexist and objectifying narratives: Certain passages suggest that women's clothing and fashion are intended to attract sexual attention and cause sexual arousal.

- Outdated information: The book cites internet usage statistics from 2002-04 without adequately contextualizing how old that data is.

I've already taken a few steps:

- Sent a formal complaint to the school principal, requesting a review of the textbook.

- Contacted the publisher and author to raise these concerns.

Several people from different schools have reported using the same textbook, which raises further questions about how widely this material is being taught.

I'm sharing this here because I believe this discussion deserves to extend beyond students currently studying in school. Many of us grew up with Educational material that went unquestioned simply because it appeared in a textbook.

My questions are

- Did your school teach similar ideas through its value education or sex education curriculum?

- Have you encountered similar textbooks or teaching practices in your own schools?

- What formal avenues are available to hold schools, publishers, and relevant educational authorities accountable for problematic educational content?

I'm not looking to turn this into a religious or political argument. The concern here is the quality and responsibility of educational material taught to children.

I'd appreciate any constructive advice, particularly from people with experience in education, publishing, law, or child rights.