Feedback thread on Keychron's prototype fingerprint sensor key

Reference Facebook post: Keychron - Sharing an early prototype we’re working on: a keyboard... | Facebook

>Sharing an early prototype we’re working on: a keyboard with a built-in fingerprint button, so you can use your fingerprint for Passkeys.

>Would you buy a keyboard with this feature? 👀

>This isn’t the final design—just a #prototype for now.

Unfortunately, I don't have Facebook, so I thought I'd make a thread here for folks to share their thoughts. Perhaps one of us can link this to Keychron's official support.

For me personally, as I use fingerprint readers daily, I think this is a great idea and not even just for passkeys, but password managers, elevation prompts, logging into various users, etc.

  1. OS compatibility is key. Windows has Windows Hello, Linux has fprintd, macOS has Touch ID. Most apps just use the OS' fingerprint standard because it's secure by default.
  2. Modularity / replaceable: I'd hate to have to buy a complete new keyboard just because this one part failed in a few years. Of course, that also means a little more security. It'd also be neat to retrofit this onto other keyboards.
  3. Not recessed: a little higher up will let your finger sit flat on the sensor and get a clean auth attempt.
  4. Fast boot-up speed: some fingerprint sensors don't boot up as fast as your OS, so you're senselessly tapping them while they're still booting. Fast boot up prevents that.
  5. The other side, as it's unclear if this is a confirmed addition: Keychron can add a USB passthrough hub or two USB ports on keyboards (e.g., left and right), so users can bring their own accessories.

Those are my quick thoughts. Feel free to add your ideas, suggestions, feedback, etc. if you'd like, too!

reddit.com
u/-protonsandneutrons- — 2 months ago

Downstream TB4 / TB5 ports: reliable and cost-effective way to add more USB-A ports using them?

With downstream TB4 or TB5 ports on a dock, I have three choices:

  1. Use one USB-C to USB-A adapter (10 Gbps)
    1. Cheapest, but only adds one USB-A port
  2. Use a USB-C to USB-A hub (10 Gbps)
    1. Nearly the cheapest, however introduces another hub: how bad is that?
  3. Use another TB4/TB5 dock downstream (40 / 80 Gbps)
    1. Many times more expensive, but the full bandwidth
    2. But again introduces another hub: also bad?

I recall Thunderbolt 4 docks forced all non-TB4 IO to share a measly 10 Gbps, which made me think it is better to use another (albeit expensive) TB4 dock downstream. I assume that is true of TB5, as well?

>Because of the difference in how Thunderbolt 4 allocates data, every port on a Thunderbolt 4 device that isn’t Thunderbolt must share a single 10GBps slice of USB bandwidth.

>Instead of having access to the full 40GBps Thunderbolt 4 supports, all non-Thunderbolt devices connected to a Thunderbolt 4 device must compete for a quarter of the available speed. That's why, in our illustration, Thunderbolt 4 is represented by a smaller sprinkler than Thunderbolt 3.

Reliability is more important here, if I had to choose.

u/-protonsandneutrons- — 2 months ago