u/-stefstefstef-

Puts own people first. (Would include disabled)

Understands how the Economy works - (Reform want to pay people to monitor disabled working into working - as if that’s a serious job?)

Respects people with conditions from vets to disabled. - Even legalises potential cures (magic mushrooms based drugs for depression and PTSD)

Policy > Personality.

I’m not saying the Benefits don’t need reform… just addresses specific parts of it.

The issue as someone with a severe mental illness who‘s writing a book / designing a video game and not doing what I notice is the worst thing to do (and never have).

Gambling

It literally should be banned in the UK, why is it a thing exactly? extract wealth from people gullible to believe that a slot machine designed by a capitaliser is going to give them fair odds at winning. I have known tonnes of people who have gone down this route as I’ve been at hospital.

People with ADHD also can’t look after themselves the most especially when it comes to gambling, they may even steal as all kinds of habits occur. I wouldn’t rule it as “miniature condition”.

Reform’s plan also has this major flaw, if you can’t work, why coerce someone into it? have they read the medication that says “don’t operate heavy machinery“, “drowsiness“ etc… just as a perspective, it’s like 17.5kg dumbbell feels like a 25kg dumbbell as someone who weight lifts occasionally and remember not struggling before I came ill. You also can put on tonnes of weight due to medication - become obese etc.

Whats the plan if the person can’t work but has been declared to be capable of being able to? You going to chuck them out on streets without being able to eat? This has to be a dumber one from Reform as someone who’s voted for them in the last general election.

The only way to really handle the medication is to go organic with foods to counter-act a lot of the symptoms… the cheap rubbish they serve in hospitals made me put on 25% more weight when I was in, since I come out I brought it down to around 10%.

Honestly would have liked to have seen a “English people first for England - same with others in the kingdom“. Such as Trump does with the US.

And really, lunatics on the street working?, people must be too used to the idea since we have pro-Palestine/Antifa marches etc.

Edit; how is reform going to cover the cost of driving all these ill people to work? Madness.

Another ban, but funnily enough, an islamist guy also on twitch has said things without justification/expected reasoning behind it but with pure malice behind his statements rarely ever gets banned.

I wonder what people think of this… it mainly points out trends in how some women vote and why they vote the way do.

I thought I’d post because it feels like a bigger problem in the UK than US as we “ban everything“ but the US doesn’t.

Most people agree on cannabis legalisation, I for one think we should take away the black market for it because drugs go into groomers hands and use it for grooming purposes.

The question being, how do you stop people to continue the grooming through the legalised version of events? make it like Amsterdam that it can only be taken in certain cafes or pubs that allow it?

Teach that the rest are basically deterioration of the body too, some of the problem is cannabis is the first drug people take, realise it’s not so bad (I know high potency can be ofcourse) and then start to think other drugs won’t be too.

Right now I believe the majority of drugs come from overseas and are laced with harder drugs to maintain addictions.

This is from my conlang notes;

Combinations Ending in w (lists round sounds)

1. iw [same sound in English “earn”] This becomes “iwrn”. Note: the IPA for iw is ɜː.
2. ew [same sound in English “lair”] This becomes “lewr”. Note: the IPA for ew is ɛə.
3. aw [same sound in English “cow”] This becomes “caw”. Note: the IPA for aw is aʊ.
4. ow [same sound in English “law”] This becomes “low”. Note: the IPA for ow is ɔː.
5. uw [same sound in English “row”] This becomes “ruw”. Note: The standard IPA for this sound in UK English is /əʊ/. However, the sound can be produced in one syllable by starting with the short central vowel /ʌ/ (as in “cup” or “uh”) and then gently rounding the lips while drifting the tongue slightly back. This creates the characteristic rounded glide heard in “row”, “go”, and “home”. This particular production method does not apply to the other vowel combinations in the same way.

Combinations Ending in y (lists sharp sounds)

1. iy [same sound in English “key”] This becomes “kiy”. Note: the IPA for iy is iː.
2. ey [same sound in English “day”] This becomes “dey”. Note: the IPA for ey is eɪ.
3. ay [same sound in English “eye”] This becomes “ayh”. (-h to tell from “Ay” for I) Note: the IPA for ay is aɪ.
4. oy [same sound in English “boy”] This stays as “boy”. Note: the IPA for ɔɪ.
5. uy [same sound in English “too”] This becomes “tuy”. Note the IPA for uy is uː.

I made a post asking people to translate a message but it was removed, this is the sentence it translated to below and it’s merit is that it uses all the above sounds;

“The quick beige fox jumps over the lazy cow near the pure air-filled blue sky, but whoever truly knows anything of art must first learn, then act, and only afterward take rightful ease in the calm thought of enjoyed youth.”

Xhu qwiq beyj foqs jumpzs uwvur xhu laziy caw niye xhu pyow ewr-fild bluy skay, but huyevur truyliy nnuwzs aniyxing of art must first liwrn, aqt, and uwnliy afterwurd teyk rayhtful iyz in xhu qalm xowht of endjoyd yuyx.

On paper this could be a solution to quick cycle being op… beatdown can create bigger pushes that would be too tanky for 1-elixir cards to stop.

My only concern is an insta-lavaloon push.

Thoughts?

HQs for instance work against each other such as;

Retail & Consumer Services ↔ Media & Communications

Defence & Security ↔ Emergency & Public Safety

Real Estate & Construction ↔ Agriculture, Energy & Natural Resources

Finance & Currency ↔ Governance, Law & Public Services

Manufacturing & Industrial Processing ↔ Transportation & Logistics

Education & Research ↔ Leisure, Hospitality & Preservation

They could work on a “we wont do as long as you don’t do” basis.

You try to make a country self-sufficient first, then you trade what you really need? Surely?

Apparently the left generally are split on this issue but I don’t see it as so in the UK because of pro-EU, pro-WEF and pro-Immigration (not at zero) seems to make us dependent on other countries?

My vision rather than the kinda California style governing in the UK;

Food supply, Steel supply, North Sea oil prioritised so people can self-sustain and if there’s a war etc, we’re a lot more prepared.

Then, with well thought out regulations, offer contracts with our educated people to other countries to build whatever they need we have built in exchange for additional resources. (A proper job can be done for a share).

This way no one can steal our technology etc… I think educating people through immigration (ignoring the current control problem) just means they’ll work out our technology gradually and then we end up with nothing to sell to the world as a low-resource country.

We have to be a high trust society in order to maintain the world stage that is separate from aiding wars in other countries for resources etc. We could practically end wars if we did this? If a country is fighting for more resources from another country? We'll help the side being stolen from etc and if they win… demand resources from the warmonger too.

The damage is already done to the UK because most UK people think Trump = Bad because the media told everyone to hate him and lied about him.

I heavily watched polls, news, YouTubers before the 2024 election and saw everything the left said get debunked or they intentionally overstretched.

Not many people from the UK watched all this unfold so I can’t see people in this country waking up to what’s going on and will continue to associate Trump and Farage with evil through baseless accusations and slander.

Nietzsche basically says that any mainstream system of morality that’s created, will actually weaken us in the sense that we lose sight of our true potential.

This is kinda like an ECHR criticism before it existed, the EU made a code and the code denies people from actually coming up with something more natural and instantly reactive.

He says if you make a code you have to be like Napoleon and a lower class at the same time. In other words, you have to be willing to get your hands dirty, but at the same time be someone who can overcome the worst outcome.

He thought religion was bad because you no longer think outside the box, he I think, thought reinvention of it was better than the complete absence of it though with a social system because there’d essentially be no morality (he’d argue no reason for it).

Why am I posting this? because if we’re going to have a serious party in, become a self-dependent country, then the country has to think how it’s going to self-sustain. The country currently thinks too lazily for this change.

There are a lot of different interpretations of the man but they’re all close overall. I think by napoleon reference - he also means “inspire the people to see different”.

At the moment I see Reform getting dragged down by Labour by focusing on them more than inspiring people.

Right-wing channels would just recommend other Right-wing channels and that would mean the Right-wing - which is bad at cooperation learns to cooperate with each other.

It’s a simple “we don’t agree on everything but recognise we need to hear each other”. Channels could end up making a podcast for partial discussion etc.

I know plenty of people would downvote this precisely because we are terrible when it comes to listening to what others have to say and there are lefty shills in the background too I guess.

From personal experience people can attack christ, attack teachings, so on… but other faiths can be more stricter than Christianity which would be like criticising Christianity but on more fundamentally bizarre ideas.

I definitely see Christianity at the shallow end for what’s out there because there is far less restrictions on what you can do personally and the religion basically just empathises equal treatment as it’s core message.

I got a false warning that I may have been doing something illegal on chatGPT but I was designing a shield for an indie game which I explained to it and it agreed but it’s put me off continuing to use ChatGPT for a while. (pictures for concept to use later)

What I learnt is Indie game developers can’t actually use AI to it’s full potential… too many safeguards are in place.

How can indie developers come up with original ideas for games but not have them stolen from people working for the AI company or government?

I don’t know where to begin. I know that AI is actually safer than humans designing new things because humans can’t reverse engineer once it’s created?

Gaming of course can create revenue for the country especially if it was less restricted then if ever put on the market it could be peer reviewed beforehand.

If someone were to create something genuinely concerning, it’s trial and error surely?

To be exact on what I mean, you can’t actually improve AI to be more accurate if the full safeguards are there (content censored because it could be interpreted the situation falsely - I.e. it thought I wanted real blueprints so didn’t generate the final image of others before it), but if there was less restrictions then if people try to circumvent into doing bad things the AI company should “patch the method“ and the government give that person a visit?

My definition would be treating another race as instead of a race, as a kind of subspecies of human. Pretty simple, Reform doesn’t do that. I don’t condone that. I’m not even 100% English in the family tree. (Somehow I magically get an automatic pass on being able to talk about it but purely English people can’t… I disagree with that because it could also be racist).

Only pointed it out because of the ignorance that goes around.

People believe men are women and vice versa.

The majority vote favours the left.

We got a new PM that’s going to be worse than Starmer.

what do we do over here?

we don’t have guns here to protect ourselves against the wrong kind.

I’d say 40% of people in the UK pretend they’re impartial, 20% are openly unimpartial and 40% are what’s left.

What do I mean exactly? Kind of like a snake, “oh buddy I’m on your side I promise, but you got it all wrong, things really work this way, trust me“, and the entire time they were thinking to them self ”I bet I can get this person on my side of politics if I haggle them enough“ and if it fails, it comes with an angry massive outburst with a pre-supposed conclusion that the individual must be evil.

I’m not going to pretend I haven’t been guilty of this as a teen (but without anger) but school-teacher tactics kinda bullied me into thinking it‘s how people obtain control and nothing else works.

Christianity is unanimously agreed as a true faith or acceptable faith in this country… being multifaith is oxymoronic… there are faiths that will contradict teachings of other faiths.

christianity basically states;

Do unto others as you’d have done unto you

Care for your neighbour

Care for your enemy as thy neighbour (keep your friends close but enemies closer echo - also can see it as having rules of war)

Do not lust after women (rape is wrong)

Reject anyone who’s unchristian (unforgivable sin - would harm even christ)

Be warey of false prophets (wolfs in sheep’s clothing)

Live by sword, die by sword (don’t resort to the weapon first).

In the Old Testament there’s still some good concepts

false rape allegation is wrong - genesis 39 and even vindicate people, perhaps even give them command if they’re innocent.

Conscious freewill is promoted - Genesis again.

10 commandments are overall promoted.

Old testament rule is when there is absent of Christianity rule of law if I were to guess.

if you say you’re even remotely faithful but probably not read all the religions in the world it’s clearly a performance Message. Some religious doctrines do go out of their way to contradict these teachings.