u/-stefstefstef-

Right-wing channels would just recommend other Right-wing channels and that would mean the Right-wing - which is bad at cooperation learns to cooperate with each other.

It’s a simple “we don’t agree on everything but recognise we need to hear each other”. Channels could end up making a podcast for partial discussion etc.

I know plenty of people would downvote this precisely because we are terrible when it comes to listening to what others have to say and there are lefty shills in the background too I guess.

From personal experience people can attack christ, attack teachings, so on… but other faiths can be more stricter than Christianity which would be like criticising Christianity but on more fundamentally bizarre ideas.

I definitely see Christianity at the shallow end for what’s out there because there is far less restrictions on what you can do personally and the religion basically just empathises equal treatment as it’s core message.

I got a false warning that I may have been doing something illegal on chatGPT but I was designing a shield for an indie game which I explained to it and it agreed but it’s put me off continuing to use ChatGPT for a while. (pictures for concept to use later)

What I learnt is Indie game developers can’t actually use AI to it’s full potential… too many safeguards are in place.

How can indie developers come up with original ideas for games but not have them stolen from people working for the AI company or government?

I don’t know where to begin. I know that AI is actually safer than humans designing new things because humans can’t reverse engineer once it’s created?

Gaming of course can create revenue for the country especially if it was less restricted then if ever put on the market it could be peer reviewed beforehand.

If someone were to create something genuinely concerning, it’s trial and error surely?

To be exact on what I mean, you can’t actually improve AI to be more accurate if the full safeguards are there (content censored because it could be interpreted the situation falsely - I.e. it thought I wanted real blueprints so didn’t generate the final image of others before it), but if there was less restrictions then if people try to circumvent into doing bad things the AI company should “patch the method“ and the government give that person a visit?

My definition would be treating another race as instead of a race, as a kind of subspecies of human. Pretty simple, Reform doesn’t do that. I don’t condone that. I’m not even 100% English in the family tree. (Somehow I magically get an automatic pass on being able to talk about it but purely English people can’t… I disagree with that because it could also be racist).

Only pointed it out because of the ignorance that goes around.

People believe men are women and vice versa.

The majority vote favours the left.

We got a new PM that’s going to be worse than Starmer.

what do we do over here?

we don’t have guns here to protect ourselves against the wrong kind.

I’d say 40% of people in the UK pretend they’re impartial, 20% are openly unimpartial and 40% are what’s left.

What do I mean exactly? Kind of like a snake, “oh buddy I’m on your side I promise, but you got it all wrong, things really work this way, trust me“, and the entire time they were thinking to them self ”I bet I can get this person on my side of politics if I haggle them enough“ and if it fails, it comes with an angry massive outburst with a pre-supposed conclusion that the individual must be evil.

I’m not going to pretend I haven’t been guilty of this as a teen (but without anger) but school-teacher tactics kinda bullied me into thinking it‘s how people obtain control and nothing else works.

Christianity is unanimously agreed as a true faith or acceptable faith in this country… being multifaith is oxymoronic… there are faiths that will contradict teachings of other faiths.

christianity basically states;

Do unto others as you’d have done unto you

Care for your neighbour

Care for your enemy as thy neighbour (keep your friends close but enemies closer echo - also can see it as having rules of war)

Do not lust after women (rape is wrong)

Reject anyone who’s unchristian (unforgivable sin - would harm even christ)

Be warey of false prophets (wolfs in sheep’s clothing)

Live by sword, die by sword (don’t resort to the weapon first).

In the Old Testament there’s still some good concepts

false rape allegation is wrong - genesis 39 and even vindicate people, perhaps even give them command if they’re innocent.

Conscious freewill is promoted - Genesis again.

10 commandments are overall promoted.

Old testament rule is when there is absent of Christianity rule of law if I were to guess.

if you say you’re even remotely faithful but probably not read all the religions in the world it’s clearly a performance Message. Some religious doctrines do go out of their way to contradict these teachings.

28% Reform

22% Conservative

and 46% Left-wing combined

3% minor parties.

we need every poll matching this kind of pattern to beat tactical voting.

what if they’d tell the migrants to do the crazy stuff to people not part of their politics?

I’m just trying to look for “incentives to keep them” and this one blew my mind when I thought of it.

It happens in the US 100% for instance where people get targeted, why couldn’t it be possible here?

but I doubt they‘d all follow 100% and have their own agendas too.

might not be true, but one day it could be?

Make England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland great again.

(I finally found an abbreviation that works)

I thought this before I heard of it, what if Starmer just calls a snap election to get revenge against his own party for wanting to out him? Rumours are circulating that this is possibly going to happen.

I really dislike when people downvote but don’t state why they disagree with the exact statements made and go beyond the point.

Truth is truth and shouldn’t be downvoted is what I feel, Reform is usually one of the havens on Reddit where you don’t get downvoted for such.

Some restore voters are converting some reform voters to restore in makerfield, but then if we get Burnham, we get Miliband, we get the EU membership again…

Right now I’m hoping that Labour revotes Starmer anyway only because Burnham seems more dangerous overall being pretty ignorant because reform are probably not going to win makerfield thanks to restore.

What will restore achieve from this except a “you let Burnham win the election (if he is chosen and worser than Starmer), we won’t vote for you now“ from its own supporters?

Why I think Farage needs to say something is quite simply because we shouldn’t get Andy Burnham in.

I asked 1-2 years ago people’s view on gun ownership for citizens (assuming the process wasn’t broken).

Should we be able to have anything to defend ourselves or should we keep to removing everything?

To be wrong, I’d assume that the left-wing are all plants from the mega-rich to make any kind of retaliation to the mega-rich seem completely mockable. If there was a genuinely better system that the mega-rich do not want us to know, they’ve successfully conned us all into believing it doesn’t exist.

I recently made a remark about florida‘s law that regarded one of the worst crimes imaginable and it essentially said they should choose a system closer to japan‘s. I was not breaking any rules because someone who causes harm should be criticisable especially regarding sensitive issues? (I didn’t even go this far, it read idiomatic speech incorrectly that was tame in our native tongue) If the appeal does not go through, I‘m literally going to be a conspiracy theorist about Reddit (Are they selectively choosing who they’re going for here). Now I have to write like a robot rather than say anything idiomatic that could be, on a basis of guilty until proven innocent be seen “well, there’s a percentage shot he could have meant this so this is how we’ll interpret it because he visits these forums”. I’ll stop using the site completely if the appeal doesn’t go through for real.

The guy who never gets banned for the most radical takes on twitch.

this probably won’t be welcomed I don’t know if I will be heard out.

I like Rupert Lowe, hope he is another Trump overall (puts all the British first), but the reality seems to me is Reform is the best contender for this upcoming election.

Maybe the election after it’s Restore… Restore are a good thing because they’d force a hand out of Reform if reform fails to deliver but after, Restore would be the answer.

- the idea of Elites trying to kill us with viruses (plagues)

- digital ID (mark of the beast on hand and forehead or in other words our identity and fingerprint).

- gog and magog, I researched it ages ago and iirc it’s about a warlord that sits on a roof (metaphor) for being above everyone else and scythians were mainly archers that could sprint away on horse back… basically the individual is unreachable and has a ranged weapon. Makes me think of communism.

call it ”ideal slot”, I.e. you always have a win-con or building to choose from as a card that’s in your hand… can’t have it evo’ed or hero or champion in the slot however.

[Ideal Slot] [Evo Slot] [Evo/Hero Slot] [Hero Slot]

Exception: Pump and Mirror can’t be in the Ideal Slot.