*Pelo menos metade dos jogos comparado aos jogadores com o maior número de partidas.
Tem notas mais baixo mas são de jogadores que jogaram pouco demais no campeonato.
Postei anteriormente dando o recorde para Douglas(que era dono do recorde antes de Gilberto ultrapassar).
De acordo com ogol.
Douglas em 146 jogos
Charles em 10 jogos
Nonato em 20 jogos
Gilberto em 16 jogos
I ain't that serious about it, but it's a matter that raises questions.
In the 1980-81 season, Pumas UNAM had a phenomenal season, they won the threee competitions they played: Mexican Primera División, CONCACAF's Champions Cup and the Copa Interamericana.
The 1981 Copa Interamericana is the only one in which the CONCACAF's representative beat a CONMEBOL representative that also won the Intercontinental Cup.
In 11 February 1981, Nacional beat Nottingham Forest in the Intercontinental Cup.
In 25 March 1981, Pumas UNAM beat Nacional in the first leg, 3-1, with 2 goals from Hugo Sánchez. In the second leg, Nacional 3-1 Pumas UNAM. So a third match was played and Pumas won 2-1.
How valid is it to refer to an Intercontinental Cup title as world title(even though FIFA does recognize it as such)?
I do think that Pumas deserves it.
Nesse partida, algumas fontes creditam dois gols para Douglas, outras creditam o segundo gol para Picolé. Teria o narrador errado o jogador que marcou o gol? Sem acesso à fontes de jornais fica questionável(Picolé tinha cabelão às vezes).
No fim os jogadores celebram Douglas, o que sugere que ele que fez o gol. Não dá pra ver o número da camisa do jogador que fez o gol.
Não faz sentido, mas eu vejo a lógica por trás, mas no final vai acabar levando mais prejuízo. Campeonatos estaduais não deixam participantes de competições regionais, nacionais e continentais fora.
A queda de público.
Aconteceu. A competição perdeu prestígio.
Copa do Nordeste 2024
- Média de 8.272,2 por partida
- Maior público 48.184
Copa do Nordeste 2025
- Média de 7.368,7 por partida
- Maior público 48.124
Copa do Nordeste 2026
- Média de 3.615,4 por partida
- Maior público 29.793
2025 distribuiu 51 milhões em premiação, enquanto 2026 distribuiu 40,58 milhões. Bahia ganhou 7 milhões em 2025, vicetória ganhou 5 milhões, mais perto do vice de 2025 do quê o Bahia.
Um grande erro da Liga do Nordeste. Essa competição não vai aguentar muito tempo dessa forma.
Remover os times maior fortes nunca foi uma estratégia de sucesso para fortalecer equipes mais fracas.
Notes:
Approximated numbers.
For editions in which multiple players were the top scorer, I considered on the player with the best average. Oleg Salenko is the highlight on this, having played only 3 matches, scoring 6 goals(5 of those in a single match). Hristo Stoichkov also scored 6 goals in 1994, but in 7 matches.
But the World Cup goal average per match counts both teams goals, so shouldn't half the average of goals per match be used instead?
It wouldn't make a difference, as all player's and editions numbers would be divided by 2 and multiple by 2.
Why?
The changes in tactics in football changed how easy it's to score goals. The big one, noticed here, is Brazil's 4-2-4, which started being implemented in Brazil, and after 1958, in the whole world, replacing the WM. I recommend looking at La Liga's decrease of goal average in the early 1960s. This allows us to give a proportionate look at the record of all these players proportionate to the reality of football at the time they played and play.
It's important to understand this stat by itself means nothing. It's understanding the context of football in each edition and how it relates to the stat and whether the stat represents it.
(Second image: Carlos Volante is the first on the *left, a bit out of the picture.
For Bahia's campaign in 1959, Geninho was the manager for all the matches, except the third final match, in which Carlos Volante toke over.
In World Cup History, the only players to win 2 World Cups while not being back-to-back were Pelé(1958-62, 1970) and Passarella(1978, 1986). (and Ronaldo and Cafu)
Another theoretical player could win the 2010 World Cup for Spain with Yamal's age(19) and win it again in 2026 with Messi's age(35) when he won it. Yet, with only 16 years apart, the squad was entirely different. And Pelé and Passarella were the only ones that remained after 8 years.
A constant point of discussion is about goal ratio. Often it comes the "it was easier to score back then". So what if we could put the same standard on the top scorer of edition?
Player's to reach 50% or more:
1- Oleg Salenko scored 6 goals in 3 matches(5 in one match), and ended with 74%
2- Just Fontaine, 60%
3- Gerd Müller, 56%
4- Eusébio, 54%
5- Stábile, 51%
Just to be clear, stats is just fun, we ain't talking about their quality only with stats
A slightely more proper ratio would be average of goals per side in a match, but that would not implicate a different result. Fontaine would have his 2,17 against 1,8 per side, leaving him with 1,2 average or 120,56%. The numbers would just be halved and doubled.
If this had merit, it would defend that what Fontaine did was absurd even adjusted to goal deflation. For comparison, Mbappé would have needed to score 15 goals in 8 matches to have beaten Fontaine.
So, a way that it can be read is that in a standardized rate, Ronaldo has a 0.9 goal rate, while Gerd Müller has a 1.12 goal rate.
I haven't fully looked at it, but in the sample 3 I looked:
Fontaine scored 56.5% of France's goals in 1958
Salenko scored 85.7% of Russia's goals in 1994
Ronaldo scored 44.4% of Brazil's goals in 2002
The percentage of their teams' goals they scored doesn't seem far from their average in relation to the edition's average.
What the hell's that. No download option or whatever?
Hoping it's fine to post this here since it involves classic bows.
I don't know if a bow like this ever existed, but I've tracked down some real bows that had been used as reference. If it existed, I expected in to be a bow from the 60s.
Foldable bow and capable of being strung by just snapping it
Why I don't easily dismiss as pure artist creativity:
I am a huge Green Arrow fan, and one thing I got interested in is identifying what real bows the artists used as reference.
Here are some real bows and the comic art:
1- The art here is a cover art, but the interior artwork is by a brazilian and this is bow here is the one in the portuguese Bow and Arrow page. Apparently a Hun bow.
2- Didn't find an exact image that I clocked is the one the artist saw, but it's likely the artist searched stuff like "tactical bow", "survival bow" and found a bunch of bows like this.
3- The writer/artist is also an archer and uses a longbow. Green Arrow's bow is supposed to be identical as Howard Hill's bow, if not the same(I don't recall if there is such an evident detail in some comic).
Reassintindo a primeira temporada.
Como é que é ok o paul simplesmente ir ver a Rita? Bicho taria cheio de restrições tipo ordens de restrição e sem poder ver os filhos.
(Eu coloquei spoiler baseado nas regras)
Revendo a primeira temporada.
Mano, doakes não presta de nada mas reconhece um psicopata de primeira. E sacanagem essa introdução dele. Tão casual e colocando protese no cara que ele cortou.
