US states using "Rabies" as a coverup to get rid of Beavers
The sudden "rabid beaver epidemic" in MD and NJ feels less like public safety and more like a convenient excuse to clear nuisance dams
Is anyone else watching how state wildlife agencies are handling beavers lately and feeling like the narrative is doing some heavy lifting?
Look at what’s played out across Maryland (Cunningham Falls) and New Jersey (Lake Henry). The moment a conflict occurs, local agencies roll out the ultimate PR trump card: Rabies. Once that word hits a local news headline, any public pushback against lethal removal, trapping, or destroying lodges completely evaporates. Its well known states hate beavers, but being a protected species they are usually limited in what they can do about it.
Beavers, like other rodents , are very rare to carry rabies. Before the NJ beavers incident, rabies HAS NEVER BEEN found in a beaver. Both attacks in MD and NJ the people were encroaching on the beavers dam where beavers are naturally protective. Not to mention the insanely fast reaction times to trap, kill, and test the beavers (all that in the NJ attack happened in less than a day :/?) This is setting a worrying precedent, that the minute they want to do waterway work, a beaver can suddenly have rabies and be disposed of without due process.
TL;DR: Rabies is real(but very unlikely in rodents, not to mention aquatic rodents...), but it's also the most effective PR cover a state agency can use to wipe out "inconvenient" beaver populations without triggering public outrage over wetland destruction.