u/Bae_of_bengal222

The context of the post was who should have the final say on having kids, and, of course, most of the comments missed the point of the OP’s post.

No one I mean no one should be forced to have a kid, and they are allowed to change their minds in any kind of relationships even if it's a shitty thing to do while being an asshole.

A woman can back out at any point in time, and so can a man who didn't want the child in the first place.

Forcing someone to have kids is nothing but reproductive coercion, and most of the time, women are victims of this for example contraceptive sabotage or poking holes in a condom, replacing birth control pills all these are forms of assault as well or coercing someone.

And most of these comments are saying well woman don't have to take care of the child since she can use grandmother and women don't even work for their kids or provide for them or you can't change your mind or men saying well you have to if you said it.

Why are men comparing these two things and justifying him making jokes about assaulting someone or trying to minimise it or doing whataboutism to downplay what he said basically raping someone just because he paid for dinner?

Men don't go out on dates with someone who they don't find attractive who doesn't fit their patriarchal beauty standards, and most of them try to use them for sex.

And if you want someone to fit your patriarchal beauty standards why shouldn't you do the same or play the role of traditional man? Why are women always expected to do so?

And they are saying sex is important no matter what because of biology so men should be denied at all and it's their right to do so.

This Tinder guy who said all women just want food and are free-loaders or gold diggers said he never swiped right but just saw it and called women bitches and chicks and says I have never spent money on these bitches and never will the most he has spend is Rs 150 for coffee in a split.

And most of them said I have spent money on them but I didn't get a kiss or no sex.

Does this conversation circle back to saying if women paid for dates and everything, rape would go away? Or it is justified because he paid for dinner?

Why are men comparing these two things and justifying him making jokes about assaulting someone or trying to minimise it or doing whataboutism to downplay what he said basically raping someone just because he paid for dinner?

Men don't go out on dates with someone who they don't find attractive who doesn't fit their patriarchal beauty standards, and most of them try to use them for sex.

And if you want someone to fit your patriarchal beauty standards why shouldn't you do the same or play the role of traditional man? Why are women always expected to do so?

And they are saying sex is important no matter what because of biology so men should be denied at all and it's their right to do so.

This Tinder guy who said all women just want food and are free-loaders or gold diggers said he never swiped right but just saw it and called women bitches and chicks and says I have never spent money on these bitches and never will the most he has spend is Rs 150 for coffee in a split.

And most of them said I have spent money on them but I didn't get a kiss or no sex.

Does this conversation circle back to saying if women paid for dates and everything, rape would go away? Or it is justified because he paid for dinner?

Munir Ahmed, a mortuary attendant at Karnataka's BRIMS Teaching Hospital, was arrested after a complaint was filed against him for allegedly taking naked photographs of deceased women in the hospital's mortuary.

The complaint was lodged by Dr Mosinul Haq, Professor and Head of the Department of Forensic Medicine at the hospital.

The complainant alleged that, during post-mortem
examinations, the accused removed the clothing from the women's bodies and used his personal cellphone to photograph them naked. Reports also suggest that these photographs and videos were then uploaded online.

The Karnataka State Women's Commission has sought a report from the government regarding these allegations, and the police are examining whether Ahmed was directly involved in uploading the material online or whether others were involved as well.

A case has been registered against Ahmed under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and an investigation is underway.

SOURCE 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/p/DZUQ4QBATsP/?

SOURCE 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZATBRezHQO/?

CREDIT 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYFYZUPoCUA/?

SOURCE 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/p/DYjrT-KEwDj/?

Link for another article about this topic 🔗 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41257-020-0027-5

CREDIT LINK 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYXXbMTIlRj/?

In fact, Indian m@les get dowry and free slaves, a baby maker for free with a caretaker.

If we remove the system of arranged marriage these entitled idiots would never get a partner and the damage caused by this system would be less and it would protect women in general.

CREDIT 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYECbuXzzrB/?

Shaheen Malik, an acid-attack survivor and disability rights activist in India, is fighting an uphill legal and social battle to secure justice and rehabilitation for others like her - and says she will not give up despite the odds.

One survivor she's been helping is Ruman* who alleges that her husband beat her and forced her to drink acid during an episode of domestic violence in 2019.
The alleged incident left her with severe internal injuries and a damaged oesophagus that had to be artificially reconstructed so that she could eat.

Despite years of treatment, Ruman struggles to swallow food and eats little. At 28, she weighs just 21kg, less than the average weight of an eight-year-old girl. Basic tasks like going to the bathroom exhaust her and she needs constant medical supervision.

But despite her grave situation, Ruman is unable to seek compensation and rehabilitative benefits that acid attack survivors are allowed under India's disability law.
The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 only recognises those as victims who have suffered visible disfiguration due to the "throwing of acid or similar substances", excluding those who have been forced to ingest acid.

In December, Shaheen petitioned the Supreme Court saying the disability law must also include survivors like Ruman.

"For survivors of forced acid ingestion, the disfigurement is internal and hence not as obvious. But their lives are extremely challenging as they find it difficult to breathe, speak and swallow food despite numerous surgeries," she says.

Malik, 42, has been campaigning for the rights of acid attack survivors for over a decade. Her determination to help others seems to come from the challenges she has had to battle as a survivor.

LINK FOR THE ARTICLE 🔗 Source: BBC https://share.google/HZ1Cw3gJQcx3WcteU

SOURCE 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYBslUhp8O4/?

Just an awareness guys this is the actual mentality of most Indians males and this should be a rude awakening for women and girls on how men view women.

LINK FOR THE REEL 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWOpwnKjHHz/?

CREDIT 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXszCjME\_Fw/?

Men don’t view sex towards women in an equal way.

They view it as something done to women a way to dominate not something both people take part in through mutual consent.

Because of this, women get degraded, insulted, and shamed for having sex, while men get praised and applauded for the same thing.

Constant slut-shaming calling women wh@re, s!uts, ran through or the famous r@ndi word while men face little to no backlash or are applauded for having sex seeing as an example of prime manhood while being promiscuous.

A lot of this mindset borders on rape-like thinking like entitlement, pressure, ignoring consent, or coercing them and acting as if women owe them sex.

A lot of men will even weaponise assault itself for shaming women for getting assaulted, using it to degrade them, and saying it could have been their fault when they open up about rape or abuse, whether in childhood or adulthood, especially when they open up in their partnerships or relationships.

And since sex is reduced to penetration, anything outside of that like women having sex with women is dismissed as not real sex, further erasing women's pleasure and centring everything around men.

CREDIT FOR THE VIDEO 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXwWO2HMXN8/

After what I saw in this sub, I thought it was funny how we’re back to the same old textbook misogyny feminism means h@ting men.

No. It means holding perpetrators of patriarchy accountable, women can be perpetrators too and commit crimes and partake in patriarchal practices as well but again people clearly don’t like it, especially when you point out it’s mostly men who are the perpetrators and protectors of that system which promotes rape, paedophilia and child marriages not just in India but all over the world.

Yes, women can be perpetrators as well and most sexual v!o!ence is committed by men denying that is just dodging reality. Feminists have been calling out misogyny, red-pill spaces, and patriarchy for years, and you still refuse to listen.

Men can be victims too, but they get mocked or dismissed often because of toxic ideas about masculinity again mostly done by men.

And where is this energy from MRAs when it comes to racism, casteism, homophobia, or ableism against men? It rarely shows up. This isn’t about caring for victims it’s selective outrage used as a gotcha.

At the core dismantling this patriarchal system means actually confronting misogyny, the bigoted system including giving up the male privileges. That’s the part people don’t want to face.

Instead, you cherry-pick what suits you and throw women under the bus while protecting the same patriarchal system that enables the harm in the first place.

And the need to compare meaningless terms to systemic misogyny is coming from a place of privilege.

Are young boys forced into child marriages? Did it make men pay a dowry? Do religious texts say men are servants who must always be submissive to women? Or were they victims of an acid attack because the groom rejected the bride???

Were they mass raped, harassed, and then asked what they were wearing? Were they k*ll£d in the womb for being male, denied education, denied the right to vote historically??

Were they forced into virginity tests and k*ll£d, shamed, and shunned if they didn’t pass?

And still, after years of unpaid labour women carry that burden. Women make up around 4 in 5 organ donors, while men are the majority of recipients.

Taking women’s labour, bodies, and even organs and still having the nerve to gaslight us and downplay the sacrifices made by women.

And yet again, hogging women’s spaces just because you can’t handle not being the centre of the discussion.

If you actually cared about dismantling patriarchy, you’d be just as loud about women’s oppression. But you’re not.

You’re loud about defending yourselves, derailing conversations, and reducing harm.

And no I’m not here to soften this or make it comfortable. I don’t need to coddle anyone for participating in or defending a system that harms women and minors.

So no this isn’t some hating.

It’s refusing to water down reality to protect fragile egos.

If that makes you uncomfortable well the truth is always uncomfortable.

Silence is complicity. Deflection is complicity.

A heart breaking dowry case has come to light from Sambhal, where a wedding was called off after the groom didn’t arrive with the baraat.

The groom, Muhammad Mustafa, a resident of Moradabad, had been demanding dowry even before the wedding. The bride’s father had already arranged around ₹7.5 lakh earlier, but just before the ceremony, the groom’s side raised a fresh demand of ₹10 lakh in cash along with a Scorpio car. When these last-minute demands were not fulfilled, the groom did not turn up, leaving the bride waiting at the venue.

The bride’s family stated that they were under continuous pressure for dowry and were unable to meet the sudden increased demand on the wedding day. Following the incident, they filed a complaint with the police, after which an investigation was initiated.

CREDIT 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXvlKADpUEf/?