u/Certain_Tonight3368

Just saw them together at Atlantis

I just got into film photography and recently picked up a Canon EOS Rebel XSN, but I keep seeing people recommend the Canon AE-1 and saying it gives more of that “cool vintage film look.”

Is it actually worth paying more for the AE-1, or will my photos look pretty similar if I use good film and lenses on the Rebel?

I’m mainly shooting for aesthetic/travel/lifestyle photos and trying to learn film photography without wasting money if the difference isn’t huge. I know the AE-1 is more iconic, but does it really produce noticeably better or “cooler” photos, or is most of the look coming from the film stock itself?

Would love opinions from people who’ve used both.

I just got into film photography and recently picked up a Canon EOS Rebel XSN, but I keep seeing people recommend the Canon AE-1 and saying it gives more of that “cool vintage film look.”

Is it actually worth paying more for the AE-1, or will my photos look pretty similar if I use good film and lenses on the Rebel?

I’m mainly shooting for aesthetic/travel/lifestyle photos and trying to learn film photography without wasting money if the difference isn’t huge. I know the AE-1 is more iconic, but does it really produce noticeably better or “cooler” photos, or is most of the look coming from the film stock itself?

Would love opinions from people who’ve used both.

I just got into film photography and recently picked up a Canon EOS Rebel XSN, but I keep seeing people recommend the Canon AE-1 and saying it gives more of that “cool vintage film look.”

Is it actually worth paying more for the AE-1, or will my photos look pretty similar if I use good film and lenses on the Rebel?

I’m mainly shooting for aesthetic/travel/lifestyle photos and trying to learn film photography without wasting money if the difference isn’t huge. I know the AE-1 is more iconic, but does it really produce noticeably better or “cooler” photos, or is most of the look coming from the film stock itself?

Would love opinions from people who’ve used both.

I just got into film photography and recently picked up a Canon EOS Rebel XSN, but I keep seeing people recommend the Canon AE-1 and saying it gives more of that “cool vintage film look.”

Is it actually worth paying more for the AE-1, or will my photos look pretty similar if I use good film and lenses on the Rebel?

I’m mainly shooting for aesthetic/travel/lifestyle photos and trying to learn film photography without wasting money if the difference isn’t huge. I know the AE-1 is more iconic, but does it really produce noticeably better or “cooler” photos, or is most of the look coming from the film stock itself?

Would love opinions from people who’ve used both.