To prove adoption
For the purpose of probate, how could you prove that you were adopted (so that you am still related to the decedent) if you were unable to obtain a copy of your birth/adoption record because the adoption might have been "private"?
For the purpose of probate, how could you prove that you were adopted (so that you am still related to the decedent) if you were unable to obtain a copy of your birth/adoption record because the adoption might have been "private"?
Here are the relevant facts:-
Given that I am not on speaking terms with my brother, could he still block/resist my probate action to inherit one-half of the decedent's estate?
America's GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) is the best bunker buster in existence, but has significant limitations:-
However, the military strategy I now propose is vastly superior to the sequential MOP "drilling" and is on par with any of the 3-categories detonating inside the bunker.
How?
The so-called Sith alchemy (or a magical evocation) could easily and naturally bypass the very deep sedementary layers protecting a nuclear bunker by making any of the 3 detonate inside the bunker without the requirement of "drilling".
So, your request should be carefully crafted to specifically target the leader of a nuclear-armed country in order to "vaporise" the individual concerned by using the "epicenter detonation" of the chosen weapon.
Therefore, it is premised on the understanding that the precise geospatial coordinates of the "hypocenter" can be easily determined at the outset by specifically making a request to "vaporise" the respective leader by using the "epicenter of the blast to obliterate the target".
Additionally, it is also assumed that the blast radius should be sufficient to kill/vaporise all of the occupants inside the bunker:-
Ultimately, the last resort defensive strategy of a nuclear bunker can still be made obsolete by bypassing the resilient buffer of a high mountain, or very deep sedement.
Would you like to provide some feedback?
[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]
Could you deploy a modern army on a different continent without a supply chain?
Could creation out of nothing (Creatio ex nihilo) solve the problem of transcontinental logistics?
Could you make a non-nuclear country surrender if you could kill 99.999999% by a full-scale nuclear attack so that there are fewer than 50 still alive?
[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]
If dark sorcery can be used to physically dismember an enemy, could the same be undone by using the power of magic?:-
Could #1 to #8 be undone by using magic? Is such an ability the PRESERVE of only a few witches?
If Sith alchemy can be used to physically dismember an enemy, could the same be undone by using the power of the Force?:-
Could #1 to #8 be undone by the power of the Force? Is such an ability the PRESERVE of only a few Sith/Jedi?
>When replacing a deceased VIP with a magical clone, identical memories are a fatal mistake. You do not want a puppet ruler who wakes up screaming from the memory of their own murder.
To prevent the clone from reliving the traumatic murder of a deceased VIP, the clone's memory of his killer would be totally erased to prevent the onset of post traumatic stress disorder.
As the clone would be totally ignorant of his killer, are the clones thereby prone to provoking the same killer over and over again due to their lack of fear of the killer; and also because the clones should have the same propensity to provoking the same person whom they dislike?
Is the clone's memory gap absolutely critical and instrumental to its downfall?
Is the memory gap a critical, obvious, and inbuilt flaw in the cloning procedure because the clone will never learn from its mistakes, and is likely to be killed (or maimed) over and over again due to the absence of protective memory?
Anthropological consensus shows that across the vast majority of human history and cross-cultural contexts, interpersonal care, tolerance, and empathy toward the disabled have been the human default.
Which begs the question: Could the so-called default be a highly effective military weapon that could be used against the enemy on a tactical front?
Presupposing that Sith alchemy could be used to clone adult humans on a tactical level (in order to replace world leaders who were assassinated and to destroy the resolve of a tactical adversary), so that any tactical military strike can be easily nullified by producing more clones, could such a "hydra" military doctrine be counteracted and defeated simply by not killing anybody at all, but any tactical enemy can be soundly bested by causing them grievous bodily harm in order to neutralise the physical, psychological, and spiritual threat that they present:-
So, a bilateral stroke can cause #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 , #9 and #10 to happen simultaneosly.
Short of killing a tactical adversary (which is totally counterproductive due to the new cloning technology), the enemy can still be bested and neutralised by using the Sith alchemy to cause them grievous bodily harm, instead.
Consequently, GBH is a superior military doctrine that can always be used to effectively counteract, neutralise, and defeat the hydra military doctrine because the human default is almost certainly not to abandon/kill their disabled in order to have them replaced by a fit and healthy clone.
Instead of annihilation/death, it is a policy of containment and punishment of the enemy.
Would you like to comment on the military doctrine of GBH to defeat multiple adversaries on a tactical front?
Matthew 5:32 (KJV): "But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery."
Matthew 19:9 (KJV): "And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery."
Is it possible to marry a divorced woman without committing adultery if her husband has passed over?
Matthew 5:32 (KJV): "But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery."
Matthew 19:9 (KJV): "And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery."
Is it possible to marry a divorced woman without committing adultery if her husband has passed over?
Could an identical adult be created by a magical spell or ritual within a few hours after the original person has passed over?
Could the deceased's relatives be motivated by a desire for continuity, and to have a seamless transition by hiding the death of the original person (especially, by hiding it from their social media adversaries on reddit, Quora, or Facebook, etc.)?
Since the social media intelligence (SOCINT) can be grossly distorted by using military deception, propaganda, and cognitive warfare, are the relatives trying to create a false impression that the original person never died?
Are the relatives trying to leverage against potential adversaries by using their psychological operations and information warfare?
PS. An adult clone of Darth Maul was apparently created by using the darkside of the force: https://youtu.be/Ga8H_7HySf0?is=onMH2I-toi2WhJFv