
HUGE 126610LN Comparison
What's up, rep fam? Today we're answering the question that's been haunting everyone out there:
Who makes the best 12-series Submariner?
u/Savoury from RWI gathered 7 watches – ARF, CPLUS, GEN, QF, RICH, RWF, and VSF – and put them through the wringer. Case, bezel, dial, hands, crystal, date, movement, crown, bracelet, and even price got scored. I include here a massive photo album so you can see with your eyes and judge based on your preferences.
350 points up for grabs. No bias. No brand loyalty. Just cold, hard facts... and a few questionable metaphors.
Let's get into it.
The Methodology
He didn't care who built it nor about Rolex's R&D budget or their history. The only question: Who makes the best Sub right now, for your money?
Every watch judged by the same criteria. Gen included, because where's the fun otherwise?
Points awarded per category. Some weigh more than others. Price is factored in because we compare everything else that way
Case – The Suit
If the dial is the face, the case is the suit. And honestly? The air is thin up here. From 30cm away, you won't spot a difference.
Winner: GEN (80/90) – but not perfect. RICH and VSF are right on its heels (77/90 each). Some reps actually have better brushing in certain spots. Funny how that works.
| Factory | Score (90) |
|---|---|
| ARF | 72 |
| CPLUS | 73 |
| GEN | 80 |
| QF | 62 |
| RICH | 77 |
| RWF | 72 |
| VSF | 77 |
Dimensions
No points here. But for the data nerds:
| ARF | CPLUS | GEN | QF | RICH | RWF | VSF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thickness (mm) | 12.6 | 12.5 | 12.4 | 12.7 | 12.4 | 12.5 |
| Diameter (mm) | 40.5 | 40.5 | 40.5 | 40.5 | 40.5 | 40.5 |
| Weight (g) | 156.3 | 156.4 | 158.9 | 161.1 | 157.6 | 156.4 |
All within a hair's breadth. Literally.
Dial – The Face
Remember the floating "m"? Those days are over. Now we're arguing about the tiny little schlong sticking out of the top-left corner of the m. 😄
Observations:
- GEN print is the "chubby" one – slightly compressed, not exactly elegant.
- VSF and RICH have the most 3D appearance.
- RICH actually lacks the little protrusion on the "m", and honestly, it looks cleaner.
- The coronet at 6 o'clock is FAT on the gen
Winner: VSF (37/40), with RICH and GEN tied at 36/40.
| Factory | Score (40) |
|---|---|
| ARF | 34 |
| CPLUS | 30 |
| GEN | 36 |
| QF | 30 |
| RICH | 36 |
| RWF | 30 |
| VSF | 37 |
Hands
Even Rolex is just cooking with water. Stamp marks visible on gen too.
What stood out:
- CPLUS and RWF have extremely fine edges, genuinely excellent.
- VSF is a bit too sharp for his taste.
- Center pinion: ARF and RICH do it best. VSF is closest to gen but creates a "bullseye" look.
Winner: CPLUS and RWF tie (10/10 each).
| Factory | Score (10) |
|---|---|
| ARF | 8 |
| CPLUS | 10 |
| GEN | 9 |
| QF | 8 |
| RICH | 9 |
| RWF | 10 |
| VSF | 8 |
Bezel – The Eyebrows & Jawline
This is where the wheat separates from the chaff. Especially the pearl.
Pearl breakdown:
- ARF: Glue residue, sits too high.
- CPLUS: Weird color, oversized frame.
- GEN: Dent in the frame, but edge is beautifully defined.
- QF: Too rounded, pip too "full."
- RICH: Sharply defined, pip not bulbous – excellent.
- RWF: Pip looks like it shrunk in the wash.
- VSF: Very similar to RICH, also excellent.
Winner: VSF (37/40), with RICH and GEN tied at 36/40.
| Factory | Score (40) |
|---|---|
| ARF | 30 |
| CPLUS | 31 |
| GEN | 36 |
| QF | 31 |
| RICH | 36 |
| RWF | 31 |
| VSF | 37 |
Crystal
Just some cool observations:
LEC (Laser-Etched Crown) tells you a lot about the AR coating.
- Blue AR tint? VSF wins – reflects noticeably less.
- Neutral AR? RICH takes it, edging out QF.
Both are "correct" as even gen varies.
Date – The Window & The Print
Texture comparison:
- GEN: Its gen, what else to add?
- ARF: Subtle, clean edges, glossy print.
- CPLUS: Eggshell texture, frayed edges.
- QF: Rough, messy, with black specks.
- RICH: Deliberately textured, sharp edges, thick print.
- RWF: Damn close to gen, but numbers look like they were painted by someone with a tremor (may be a QC issue).
- VSF: Eel-smooth.
Winner: RICH (35/40).
| Factory | Score (40) |
|---|---|
| ARF | 31 |
| CPLUS | 32 |
| GEN | 33 |
| QF | 31 |
| RICH | 35 |
| RWF | 31 |
| VSF | 29 |
Movement
Closed caseback, so this is mostly aesthetics.
Quick takes:
- DD3235 has a solid rep for reliability.
- JH3235 is too new to judge long-term.
- SH... well, it's SH.
Aesthetics winner: GEN (10/10) – obviously. Best clone finish: JH3235 base + RWF rotor would be the dream combo.
| Factory | Score (10) |
|---|---|
| ARF (SH3235) | 8 |
| CPLUS (DD3235) | 8 |
| GEN | 10 |
| QF | 7 |
| RICH (JH3235) | 9 |
| RWF | 8 |
| VSF (VS3235) | 7 |
Crown
Genuine isn't always better.
- RICH: Sharply defined, tips are cleaner and crisper than gen.
- VSF: Beautifully formed "bumps."
- GEN: Has depth, but RICH edges it out.
Winner: RICH, VSF, and GEN tie (18/20).
| Factory | Score (20) |
|---|---|
| ARF | 16 |
| CPLUS | 17 |
| GEN | 18 |
| QF | 16 |
| RICH | 18 |
| RWF | 17 |
| VSF | 18 |
Bracelet & Clasp
The part that's on your wrist 24/7. Brushing? Everyone's pretty much indistinguishable from gen now.
Where things fall apart:
- Screws: Visible tool marks on many. Some have "halos" around the slots from post-polishing.
- VSF clasp has a visible weld seam inside. Why? God knows.
- QF still has rust issues (same as their GMTs).
- Glidelock: RICH is too tight, overdone tolerances. ARF and QF feel rough.
Winner: CPLUS, GEN, RICH, RWF tie (80/90).
| Factory | Score (90) |
|---|---|
| ARF | 76 |
| CPLUS | 80 |
| GEN | 80 |
| QF | 73 |
| RICH | 80 |
| RWF | 80 |
| VSF | 79 |
Price – The Elephant in the Room
| Factory | Price (approx.) | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| ARF | $500 | 10/10 |
| CPLUS | $500 | 10/10 |
| GEN | $11,000+ | 2/10 |
| QF | $500 | 10/10 |
| RICH | $500 | 10/10 |
| RWF | $500 | 10/10 |
| VSF | $500 | 10/10 |
Final Scores
| Factory | Total (340) |
|---|---|
| 🥇 RICH | 310 |
| 🥈 GEN | 304 |
| 🥉 VSF | 302 |
| 4. CPLUS | 291 |
| 5. RWF | 289 |
| 6. ARF | 285 |
| 7. QF | 268 |
A remarkably close finish. RICH takes the crown on the scorecard thanks to strong all-around performance and unbeatable value.
The takeaway? If you want the "closest to gen" without considering price, GEN wins most of the time. But if value matters? RICH and VSF are the kings.
The Verdict
There is no single "best" Submariner.
The best one is the one that fits your taste, your priorities, and your budget. For Savoury RICH took it on value and finishing. For others, VSF's crystal and dial win. Some still swear by Clean.
Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | GEN | RICH (🥇) | VSF (🥈) | CPLUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Score | 80/90 | 77/90 | 77/90 | 73/90 |
| Bezel Score | 36/40 | 36/40 | 37/40 | 31/40 |
| Dial Score | 36/40 | 36/40 | 37/40 | 30/40 |
| Hands Score | 9/10 | 9/10 | 8/10 | 10/10 |
| Date Score | 33/40 | 35/40 | 29/40 | 32/40 |
| Movement | 10/10 (gen) | 9/10 (JH3235) | 7/10 (VS3235) | 8/10 (DD3235) |
| Crown Score | 18/20 | 18/20 | 18/20 | 17/20 |
| Bracelet Score | 80/90 | 80/90 | 79/90 | 80/90 |
| Price Rating | 2/10 | 10/10 | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| TOTAL | 304 | 310 | 302 | 291 |
So, who has the best Sub?
Honestly? You decide. That's the beauty of this hobby.
Now go check your QC pics, buy from Trusted Dealers, and enjoy the watch that makes you happy.