Children with names of drastically different popularity levels? Thoughts?
My first child, we gave a name that holds great significance to us. It’s not common, only 60-70 babies per year in the US for the past few years have been given this name. With that being said, it’s incredibly easy to spell and pronounce, and no one ever bats an eye at it.
For our second, our top name has lived regularly in the top 200 hundred names. It hasn’t broken the top 100 but might in the future. It does have two spellings but only one common pronunciation (at least within the us). If you combine the two spellings, about 3000 babies were given a form of this name in 2025. I still don’t see any issues with this name.
Just curious if there is a view point or consensus on having kids with names of different popularity levels, especially to this extent. Or personal experiences from people with similar naming styles in their families.
They both will have one syllable unisex middle names. The names don’t rhyme or start with the same letter or anything themed. Neither would remotely be considered tragedeigh level despite one being less common.
Just looking for thoughts and opinions. Curious for a discussion. Thanks!
ETA name examples:
I’m going to choose 1990 because it’s close to the people I grew up with 😂. My uncommon first child would be close to a Baron, Turner, Alise, or Carlene in 1990. While my new name is closer to a Garrett, Clayton, Colleen, or Raven in 1990.