Is the demon actually gonna write a new book entitled "The LSAT is Fun" ? If yes, what will be the content in it and how will it be different from "The LSAT is Easy" ?
In a podcast, the Demon hosts spoke about how the sufficient assumption 'makes the argument win'. This definitely sounds like a strengthen question. The only difference would be that the strengthener makes the argument stronger, whereas the sufficient assumption fully proves the conclusion. Would this be a correct observation ?
Which prof do I choose ? I want one whose assignments and exams are all open-book and unproctored.
My dad keeps doing this to me and my little brother all the time.
For hobbies: "Why're you wasting your time on this dumb stupid shit?"
For friends: "Why're you hanging out with these dumb stupid useless nobodies?"
I was asked to take care of my 16 year-old nephew. He is normally very shy, very awkward, and timid. However, today, he became very arrogant and cocky. He didn't do any chores and even bullied other children. When asked to explain why, he said he had a 4.0 GPA, which somehow put him above the rules and justified everything he did.
What are you supposed to do in this context ?
My 17 year old cousin lied to everyone at school and told them he was super rich, a chest grandmaster, a polyglot, and someone of incredible status and power. All of this was fabricated and a complete lie.
He's not an adult, but is this behavior normal for boys his age ?
How exactly are you supposed to solve strengthen and weaken questions on RC ?
On RC, how exactly is someone supposed to remember the information in the passage? Obviously, most RC questions could be classified as Must-be-trues and/or Main points. As such, understanding and knowing/owning the passage is the main goal of every test-taker.
How exactly is this supposed to be done ?
Is it about thinking about everything in the passage ? By thinking about everything, can you better recall it later ?
Of course, there are moral implications. But, in general, would most people think it is "fun" to lie ? Like the power and control exerted ? As well as the ego boost from it ?
I keep hearing mixed reviews. Is it worth the investment?
This is actually serious. Are any women at the uofa into soft mommy dom? Like being called "mommy" and calling a man "good boy" ?
I have her next semester. How is the course and how is she as a prof ? Should I drop the class ?
And their profs too.
To lose weight, you need a calorie deficit. Many people claim that OMAD puts you in a deficit by restricting your eating (unless you're eating tubs of lard or something). As such, is calorie counting necessary if you just eat clean, whole foods, and volume eat ?
Like, can I eat anything for one meal and still be in a deficit ?
Obviously, social interactions are healthy for humans. But some people seem to be just fine without them. They have no friends, no significant others, etc.. Are they really just fine?
In the Demon philosophy, it is emphasized that all RC questions are must-be-true and main point questions (Main points are just a subset of must-be-trues). Because so much depends on understanding what one reads, would it be advisable to treat RC like studying for a college exam when reading the passage?
I keep hearing this sentiment in the environmental community. Even Dr. Jane Goodall has said some important things about it.